![]() |
|
Quote:
Its hard to go too wrong on a $100 bike unless the frame is cracked or bent. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
so someone makes a crack in a PM about how tiny that frame was and how they are glad its not their back... I just tape measured it...
the 'virtual' top tube length is 22", or 56cm, measured from the intersection of the centerline of the top tube and the headtube, dead level to the centerline of the virtual seattube aka seat post. and the virtual frame size, BB center to virtual TT center along the seatpost is 19" or 48cm... so its a little short, but not -that- short. I rode a 23" in old style road frames. its actually 1-2" *longer* wheelbase than my old cruiser?!?!? (I just eyeballed the two frames), I think this is virtue of a longer fork rake. it handles really nicely at very low speeds, quite stable and not at all twitchy (my cruiser could sometimes get twitchy at 2-3MPH walking speeds, and also could get a little wobbly at 30mph downhills if I wasn't real careful with my bar input) I'm a thinking, I'm gonna -like- this ride. Meanwhile, brakes, and shifters are installed and cabled. just waiting for the bottom bracket, crankset, so I can slap a chain on it and go to town. updated picture with latest additions... http://lh4.ggpht.com/_JS1yca5KB-0/TC...0/IMG_6979.JPG sigh, v-brakes don't particularly like my preference for right hand front brake, backwards from the bike industry standard. the cable gets pretty sharply bent and wants to put a little lean on the brake making it harder to keep them centered. I have their spring pins in the middle position, maybe I should go for a little more spring tension so the cable torque is less important. |
Quote:
Hitting the MTU trails tomorrow for the first time on the new steed, should be interesting to see how that goes. I'm trying to make a point of riding at least 4x a week so I can lose my beer muscle to the point of not scaring attractive women. |
:ricky
Quote:
Easy Racers are sweet. i think they are from Santa Cruz County here, in Watsonville. ps. we want pictures of your bicycles |
Does anybody here wear the loose MTB style shorts?
I see that most have some sort of chamois liner. Does that liner fit like lycra shorts? I'm wondering if a short like this would be suitable for more casual rides; like around town. I'm concerned about the outer layer bunching up and causing irritation. |
I find a cheap pair of I'll boxers help keep bunching to a minimum, but they obviously don't fit as tightly.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No problems with bunching at all. Just be careful to get them in a length that allows for decent pedal form. I wear them with a non logo'd road jersey or a decent MTB pullover. If I wear the MTB pullover, I use a Camelbak that has enough room to carry my snacks and Nuun tabs, sunscreen, camera, phone, wallet and any layers I peel off. If I wear a street jersey all that crap fits in my pockets and I wear a thinner Camelbak. Don't forget chamois cream! TMI Moment: Now that I'm "of a certain age" some of my boy parts tend to stick to my leg. Chamois cream keeps that from happening. Worth the money to eliminate any potential chafing issues. |
Don't know much about geography I photochopped some numbers I measured... :deal http://hogranch.com/files/Bitmaps/mi...r-geometry.jpg same top tube length as a 56c CX bike. same head angle too, but shorter trail on the fork (I didn't measure my trail, but it sure looks shorter in the pictures). same chain stay length. |
Quote:
My girlfriend is an MTU alum. We went to Houghton a few years ago for vacation, revisiting her old haunts. I was pretty new to mountain biking at the time, and I think the MTU Trails were the first time that I realized that mountain biking could be as much fun as motorcycling. |
| Times are GMT -7. It's 04:19 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011