ADVrider

ADVrider (http://www.advrider.com/forums/index.php)
-   Beasts (http://www.advrider.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Adventurebike Suggestions. (http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=856744)

SRG 01-19-2013 08:57 AM

Adventurebike Suggestions.
 
Hey Guys,

Thought I could work this out myself, but that doesn't seem to be happening.

I'm 55, 6'-1"/200#, in OK shape, and have been riding dualsports and dirt bikes since I was a teenager.

I have the little bike/scooter ('75 CT90) and light weight dualsport ('10 Berg FX450) covered.

Even with these 2 wonderful machines, I find myself wanting a third bike. The kind of thing I'm wanting is: good on gravel, better on pavement. Not too fat (< 400#). Good for 2 up. Good for longer rides (300 mile days) and good for trips of up to a week. I'd like fuel injection and 6 speeds. Budget is $5k or so, less would be better.

Bikes I've looked at/considered:

KTM 950 Adv. - Seems best, but it's too big, faster than I need and more complex/expensive than I want. Still might be the best choice. I do like them and KTM's in general, I've had EXC's and a 640 Adv. in the past. 690 Enduro - Maybe, prolly do everything I ask except the "good 2 up" part also prolly outside budget. Too close to the Berg I already have?

Ducati Multistrada - The 1000's and up are too big and fast. I thought one of the 620 ones might work but they aren't really "good on gravel". I do like them (the 620). Elefant - Ticks all the boxes. I like it. Kind of an antique now. Hypermotard - I like the smaller ones. Not really sensible for my use.

Aprillia Caponord - Too big/fat/fast. Pegaso - no 6 speed, single cly., a bit dated. SVX 550 - really cool bike, not remotely sensible for my use.

Cagiva Gran Canyon - Getting closer, still a little fat. Cool bike though.

Buell Ulysses - "good on gravel"? not really. Seems like a fun bike but I'm not convinced I'd like it. A little large.

Kawasaki Versys - Probably a good choice, but doesn't wind me up.

Suzuki V Strom - Ditto

BMW GS - The big ones are way too fat. The small ones - meh. The old ones are antiques.

Triumph Tiger - Too big/fat/fast. Don't think any of the newer smaller ones are in budget.

Anything left that I missed? Any suggestions/comments on the ones above? Am I just full of crap and searching for something that doesn't exist?

It'sNotTheBike 01-19-2013 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SRG (Post 20525577)
Am I just full of crap and searching for something that doesn't exist?


Your self-imposed constraints paint you into a corner, and there are no bikes
waiting in that corner.

Either you have to spend more money than $5K or you have to give up
certain of your "wants" because the intersection of the sets of what you
want and what you can afford is empty. In other words, there are no
bikes which fit all your stated requirements, so either you do without a bike
or you relax some of the requirements so you can actually have a bike.


To me the choice is very obvious : a 650 "Wee" Strom does most of what you
want to do. Of course it won't have problems like a KTM LC8 bike will
( and I OWN an LC8 950 so I know first hand of the various issues with
LC8 bikes ) but on the other hand the Wee will get you down the road just fine
and be cheap to own and operate. The Wee is fast enough, handles well enough,
is reliable, can be bought for a price that works with your budget, and will be easy to
re-sell when the time comes. What's not to like ?

By the way, regardless of price, I wouldn't have any of the Italian bikes you mentioned,
or the Buell, or any of the BMW GS bikes. The big BMW GS in particular is one of the most
over-rated and disappointing bikes I have ever ridden. I got back on my 950 SE after
riding a 1200 GS and the first thing that came into my mind was : "Now THIS is what
a motorcycle should be like !" The BMW is a ponderous overweight sluggish thing,
and the control layout is stupid, and the brakes were over-assisted like a Cadillac
or something. All I can say is that the people who own them must not have ridden
many other bikes, either that or they don't care about how a bike feels while riding it.
The BMW is the two-wheeled equivalent of an SUV which would never ever actually do
any serious off road but pretends to be able to do so. Sure, you can take that pig off road,
but why on earth would you want to ?



.

xrcris 01-19-2013 09:37 AM

Hitting that price point, < 5$K, I'd think the Strom is the only one that meets most of your other criteria. Less than 400#'s is tough too, don't think that there are many multi cylinders that are that light.

Going to need to prioritize a little more with that list of wants.....

vivo 01-19-2013 09:59 AM

Maybe a Triumph Scrambler because u like European bikes and its got a cool factor.

Vivo

SRG 01-19-2013 10:47 AM

V Strom - just doesn't "do it" for me. I know they are good bikes, I just don't want one. So those are out.

Triumph Scrambler - Defiantly cool. Kind of outside the box, but worth thinking about.

I don't think I'm really asking too much and I am willing to give a little on some of the wishes. Hell, my old Transalp did most of it. So far I'm liking the Cagiva Gran Canyon - any comments on that? Otherwise, the 620 Multistrada seems good except for the gravel part. Anyone ever done a 19" front wheel conversion on a MS?

Keep it coming. Thanks.

xrcris 01-19-2013 11:52 AM

What's the reason for the $5K limit, poor or cheap? Either way, with the European bikes, like the Cagiva, they're cool, but getting parts for one is only going to get more difficult. If you just want a low buy-in, maybe that doesn't matter.

What kind of gravel roads are you thinking about? Smooth and graded? If so, you'd have more options with a full on street bike. Since you mentioned the Ulysses, maybe one of the older tube frame Buells? My VFR is a fuelie, and you can find those around for less than 5. Maybe an FZ6? Older Bandits are wicked cheap as well (don't think those are FI though). Sub-400#s, fuel injected and less than 5 grand isn't possible.

No False Enthusiasm 01-19-2013 12:26 PM

From FM:

Quote:

For Sale is a 2007 Triumph Scrambler 865 CC (Blue/White) in excellent condition with 11,000 miles.

Extras include:
Triumph Hand Guards, Triumph Fly Screen (White),
Triumph Engine Guards (Chrome),
Upgraded suspension (Ikon Rear Shocks, Progressive Fork Springs w/fresh 10 wt. fork oil),
Skid Plate (Chrome)
Clear Lens Turn-Signal Kit.
Norman Hyde Toga slip-ons have been installed and the carbs re-jetted for optimal performance.
This bike also comes with custom mounted Pelican Hard Bags for touring.
Tires are Conti Trail Attacks with good tread remaining.

This motorcycle has been well maintained and adult ridden.
Price is $5,750/OBO.
Located in Charlotte N.C. and have title in hand.
But, I'd still look for a Wee...

NFE

nbsdave 01-19-2013 12:48 PM

at your price point, I'd give more thought to a Wee.
you'll get newer than most others on your list (generally speaking) and it will likely have most of the farkles you'd want.
Plus, they are bullet-proof (07 and up).

SkiFastBadly 01-19-2013 04:56 PM

I would argue with your assertion that the Uly is not good on gravel. Loose gravel, you have a point. But packed gravel? I took mine twice on the Pony Express trail between Salt Lake City and Nevada, and never had any problems. Back when I lived in Utah, I took that Uly all over the place, with the Pirelli Scorpion Syncs. Funniest thing a guy ever said to me was a friend who has a 1200GS. He said "I can see those tires aren't made for gravel because I can see the gravel flying out from under them." I said "Yeah man, because you're behind me."

You can buy a nice used Uly for 5K and it will meet all of your criteria. Try one.

xaman 01-19-2013 05:17 PM

The Uly could ride TKC80s nowadays and be great on gravel, as long as you don't mind wearing out that rear tire fast.


But I sold mine and have a scrambler, and it's a hoot. As good as the Uly for day trips sub 300 miles and sub 90mph. A little better on forest and gravel roads (lower cg and 19" front). Uly is better for luggage.


Both are great bikes.

bmac 01-19-2013 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SRG (Post 20525577)
Am I just full of crap and searching for something that doesn't exist?

The short answer is YES!

It seems you are looking for an exotic at bargain basement pricing. Pick one, not both.

SkiFastBadly 01-19-2013 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xaman (Post 20528994)
The Uly could ride TKC80s nowadays and be great on gravel, as long as you don't mind wearing out that rear tire fast.


But I sold mine and have a scrambler, and it's a hoot. As good as the Uly for day trips sub 300 miles and sub 90mph. A little better on forest and gravel roads (lower cg and 19" front). Uly is better for luggage.


Both are great bikes.

I have both and they're very different bikes. The Uly is certainly more sporty. The Triumph is a special bike, you'll get in conversations at every gas station. The Uly seat is far better. I've done 500 mile days on the Uly, the Triumph would kill me, I think. The key difference is, in my opinion, is that the Uly is maxed out, the elves did everything they could to wring the last bit of HP out of it, everthing's advanced and complicated...and that can lead to failures like the ECM, the rear bearings, some other electrical gremlins....and the Triumph is underengineered. My Scrambler is an 08 so it still has carbs, and that bike is totally bullet proof. I hope I never have to sell either one.

Ockrocket 01-19-2013 05:58 PM

Kawasaki KLE500 - cheap 6 speed twin cylinder that is both highway and very dirt capable [mine is a '94 model, love it]

Or Honda Transalp XLV650 - I have ridden a couple of them and they feel quite good.

[if either are available in your location]

The Wee-Strom probably tops the list though [another bike I currently own, fantastic and reliable bike, not for serious motocross type dirt though :rofl ]

When it comes down to it "meh" is not so bad, it usually means something that is not a high strung, temperamental, unreliable, cantankerous and expensive to own bitch :huh

Reliability and cheap to run make for the best riding......and lots of it because of the dollars saved by not going with the "look at me" brands. :deal

roostar 01-19-2013 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by It'sNotTheBike (Post 20525911)
Your self-imposed constraints paint you into a corner, and there are no bikes
waiting in that corner.



By the way, regardless of price, I wouldn't have any of the Italian bikes you mentioned,
or the Buell, or any of the BMW GS bikes. The big BMW GS in particular is one of the most
over-rated and disappointing bikes I have ever ridden. I got back on my 950 SE after
riding a 1200 GS and the first thing that came into my mind was : "Now THIS is what
a motorcycle should be like !" The BMW is a ponderous overweight sluggish thing,
and the control layout is stupid, and the brakes were over-assisted like a Cadillac
or something. All I can say is that the people who own them must not have ridden
many other bikes, either that or they don't care about how a bike feels while riding it.
The BMW is the two-wheeled equivalent of an SUV which would never ever actually do
any serious off road but pretends to be able to do so. Sure, you can take that pig off road,
but why on earth would you want to ?


.

I don't think he likes BMW's :lol3

vivo 01-19-2013 06:45 PM

The Wee was also my first thought and it's a fine choice. ... buttt. Its that, "I can't love it" factor. I also owned a Caponord, will tour all day, two up at 85. Not lightweight but not difficult to manage, mostly reliable, good net support. But I think too much bike and the Triumph is more manageable but two up will not match the Capo. Pick your poison.

Vivo m


Times are GMT -7.   It's 08:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014