View Single Post
Old 05-17-2012, 12:50 PM   #3004
permanent ex-pat
slideways's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Ocean Dweller
Oddometer: 5,919
Originally Posted by chazbird View Post
It wasn't Cessna's fault but the early production run with those engines (6 cyl Continental IO-360's whatever dash series) were, to be kind, basically lemons. (another version with a higher prop speed eked out 210 hp, but that put it in the "high performance category). At the time I was actually warned by a sage old timer who had pilots license #300 or something, signed by one of the Wrights not to get in one. I figured if that's what he thought then I ought to trust him. In later years I flew one and, well, I'm here. It does bring up some of the other not so well known versions of the old types that are really underrated: The Piper Dakota comes to mind. Easily does everything a 182 does, is probably cheaper and not prone to tweaking the engine mounts.
Its 195 hp Continental 10-360-K fuel injected engine is actually the 210 hp Continental, but all the muffling required to meet FAA/EPA standards sucked up 15 horses.
“Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary… that’s what gets you.”

Upper Italian Lakes report.

South Africa, Swaziland, Botswana ride report

Great CanAm Tour
slideways is offline   Reply With Quote