Originally Posted by _cy_
IMHO this is why public opinion is heavily in Lance's favor (donations up 25x). even folks who don't follow cycling understand fair play. .
Yes, money to the LA promotion charity rolled in.
I like Phil Leggets commentary but the guy is just a talking head for livestrong and LA. The first person evidence against this guy is overwhelming.
The only people who think LA didn't dope are the ones who don't follow cycling. If the organization administering the doping results is corrupt then what?
Bottom line, if he was innocent why didn't he fight the charges. Because his good friends who made a lot of money off of their association with him would all of a sudden lie about him? Hardly. He can outspend the opposition many times over in legal fees, so how could he loose?
The only thing that has become more apparent from all of stories written about him over the last few years by journalists, other cyclists and others involved in professional cycling that besides being a doper the guy is a prick.
Sorry cheater, karma is a bitch.
And the shit will hit the fan in a few days.