Thread: Yup....
View Single Post
Old 12-05-2012, 06:18 AM   #13
Studly Adventurer
redhandmoto's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: People's Democratic Republic of Tarsnakestan
Oddometer: 566
Originally Posted by MODNROD View Post
I actually think Hayabusa's ARE dangerous, and are only to be played with at your peril.
and you love it, Dave; you know know you do

Originally Posted by MODNROD View Post
I personally think the designers should be brought to task on what is obviously a safety issue.
An interesting point. I once heard Tom and Ray Magliozzi, the Tappet Brothers, rage at length about the sheer irresponsibility of manufacturers, in an age of petroleum shotage and safety concerns, putting 300+ horsepower in light plastic-bodied production cars and bragging about it.

They were objectively correct, of course, but GM, Ford, et al, are only filling market sector desires: lotsa people want and will pay a premium for cars that cannot be legally or even safely driven to anything near their capabilities; the heart wants what the heart wants.

Inherent lethality? The single most lethal production vehicle ever made is the Chevrolet Camaro IROC Z28 (that's for Philistines, of course; my preferred Nutso, No-Justification-Whatsoever car is the Subaru WRX).

But this is all the other end of the stick: not native slowness, but built-in excess incontinently used that gets people killed. That is not the fault or design flaw of the machine - it's the nut holding the wheel.

Well damnmyeyes if I ain't done another threadjack.
DR-Z400SM, '68 Honda 305, '64 Honda C110, '06 Honda VT750, GTS 250ie, Genuine 150, Vino 125, Zuma 125, Yam C3, Honda Met, Tomos ST, PCX 150, Honda PS250 Big Ruck, Vino Classic 49, Honda Rebel, and a Lifan CT 70 clone I forgot about...
redhandmoto is offline   Reply With Quote