Aviation MegaThread!!!!

Discussion in 'Shiny Things' started by EvilGenius, Jan 1, 2009.

  1. EvilGenius

    EvilGenius 1.5 Finger Discount

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    20,337
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    "FiFi" just flew over at about 500' AGL.
  2. Klay

    Klay dreaming adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Oddometer:
    124,325
    Location:
    right here on my thermarest
    [​IMG]

    In my opinion, this would have made a much better choice for the joint strike fighter. Far less expensive, far simpler. We wouldn't be in the mess we're in with the F-35 now. And it's better-looking.
  3. EvilGenius

    EvilGenius 1.5 Finger Discount

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    20,337
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Beauty is in eye of the beholder.
  4. cross-country

    cross-country .

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Oddometer:
    1,816
    Location:
    Grand Junction, CO
    It's the happiest looking aircraft eva!

    [​IMG]
  5. Klay

    Klay dreaming adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Oddometer:
    124,325
    Location:
    right here on my thermarest
    We needed a modern version of the A-6 for a strike fighter. A dump truck, not a Ferrari. What a mess.
  6. JamesG

    JamesG Rabid Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Oddometer:
    10,946
    Location:
    Columbus, GA

    I'm sure Boeing would have found a way to make a soup sandwich of it and milk it for a few billion in over-runs too.
  7. Klay

    Klay dreaming adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Oddometer:
    124,325
    Location:
    right here on my thermarest
    It was a much more conservative design. I doubt it.
  8. PvtIdaho

    PvtIdaho Deck Spotter

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Oddometer:
    3,267
    Location:
    Guam
    :freaky
  9. Mambo Danny

    Mambo Danny I cannot abide.

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    Oddometer:
    22,153
    Location:
    11 ft. AMSL
    That Boeing design just flat fell short on too many areas. It was simpler, yes, but it was also nearly entirely wrong... or poorly thought out.

    I'm not Lockheed fan-boy, but when there are only two choices and one is just a total WTF moment, the other will win.
  10. Hay Ewe

    Hay Ewe Just a Wannabe

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Oddometer:
    8,041
    Location:
    FNQ - AUS
  11. EvilGenius

    EvilGenius 1.5 Finger Discount

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    20,337
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Why not just update the F-4 with increased payload and some stealth trickery?

    It'd be the best of both worlds.
  12. No False Enthusiasm

    No False Enthusiasm a quiet adventurer Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Oddometer:
    17,738
    Location:
    Small Town, Texas
  13. Klay

    Klay dreaming adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Oddometer:
    124,325
    Location:
    right here on my thermarest
    The X-32 had vertical landing capability and stealth characteristics. Perfect dumptruck of a strike fighter.
  14. Klay

    Klay dreaming adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Oddometer:
    124,325
    Location:
    right here on my thermarest

    they had some perfectly good designs, but they focused on heavy bombers for efficiency's sake.


    [​IMG]
  15. Klay

    Klay dreaming adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Oddometer:
    124,325
    Location:
    right here on my thermarest
    What exactly was wrong with it? I would much prefer the lift arrangement...more like the proven Harrier. They had flying prototypes that proved to be satisfactory.
  16. JamesG

    JamesG Rabid Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Oddometer:
    10,946
    Location:
    Columbus, GA
    Which would have been great if the specs were just for a Harrier replacement. But it was for an "everything with an F or A prefix designator" replacement. In that the X-32 had no chance.
  17. Gunner45

    Gunner45 Out on the trail

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Oddometer:
    282
    Location:
    Utah, USA
    There is a great NOVA episode called the battle of the x planes. Im sure you can wathc the video on the PBS website.

    Gunner45
  18. Klay

    Klay dreaming adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2005
    Oddometer:
    124,325
    Location:
    right here on my thermarest
    Please explain.
  19. JamesG

    JamesG Rabid Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Oddometer:
    10,946
    Location:
    Columbus, GA
    No. Go Wiki yourself. :D
  20. Gernick

    Gernick Long timer

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Oddometer:
    3,705
    Location:
    Far Western New York
    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QiYykW268qQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>