Option for raked tree?

Discussion in 'Hacks' started by Prmurat, Aug 9, 2013.

  1. Prmurat

    Prmurat Long timer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Oddometer:
    4,710
    Location:
    No where
    Has anyone used "racked cups" instead of raked triple trees?
    Something like this on Ebay: item:190544961001
    In general: is 3 degrees enough or is it better to go to 5??
    Thanks.
    #1
    brstar likes this.
  2. GreatWhiteNorth

    GreatWhiteNorth Long timer

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Oddometer:
    6,276
    Location:
    Winterpeg - site of flatness beyond belief
    I don't think that'll actually reduce steering effort. What you're looking to achieve is "trail reduction", not just raking the front end out. Some time ago I stumbled across this pic on the 'net which explains it well:

    [​IMG]

    Several companies offer modded triple trees - I bought mine for my Gold Wing from Side Effects in Kamloops BC. Made a huge difference.
    #2
  3. jaydmc

    jaydmc Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Oddometer:
    1,868
    raked cups will do almost nothing for you. You want to reduce trail. You did not say what bike you are working with. We have many different triple tree's. Side-effects is no longer doing tree's
    Jay G
    DMC sidecars
    www.dmcsidecars.com
    866-638-1793
    #3
  4. JustKip

    JustKip Long timer

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Oddometer:
    9,600
    Location:
    Fresno, CA
    Triple tree vs. Leading link?

    Does a modified TT reduce trail and steering effort as much as LL? I KNOW LL costs quite a bit more...
    #4
  5. Old Mule

    Old Mule Long timer

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Oddometer:
    1,575
    Location:
    Overland Missouri, home of 1950s sidecar tech.
    Kip, it is not the method used to reduce trail that counts, but the amount of trail that you end up with.
    There have been many solo bikes that used leading link forks, from Honda 50s to springer Harleys.
    Use the diagram up above to do the calculations on your own bike. What is the trail now?

    Just get the number down to about half of that, and then figure out which method you want to use to achieve your goal.

    Ther are a couple threads on this site that go deeply in to the subject of leading link and Earles forks. Do your research.
    #5
  6. jaydmc

    jaydmc Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Oddometer:
    1,868
    As stated, it does not matter how you reduce trail as long as you reduce it. I like to get the final numbers under 2 inches when possible. In the past leading links were the only way to go as fork tube diameter was a lot smaller then most bikes are using today. As such forks tended to flex a lot and also have stiction issues that made leading links a better way to go. There are many other ways that work out well to reduce trail. So, What bike are you working with?
    Jay G
    DMC sidecars
    www.dmcsidecars.com
    866-638-1793
    #6
  7. claude

    claude Sidecar Jockey

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Oddometer:
    5,756
    Location:
    Middleburg, Pa. (Snyder County)
    Cups may reduce trail more with some triple trees than others. It just depends on how much structural 'meat' on has to work with on any given tree. You do not want to compromise the structural integrity of the trees..period..

    Aftermarket trees are probably better in most cases than cups. However....make sure that the producer of the aftermarket trees is okay with them being utilized for sidecars or trikes. Some trees are made to work with the chopper type solo bikes with steering head angle changes and long front ends to arrive at a decent trail figure and may not be up to the task of handling the side loads imposed by a dual track vehicle.

    Champion does nice stuff.... Jay's stuff should be fine..there are others. Leading links are still my favorite for various reasons but we do trees also.
    #7
  8. Prmurat

    Prmurat Long timer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Oddometer:
    4,710
    Location:
    No where
    #8
  9. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,779
    If you are wanting to decrease the amount of trail on a solo bike, to make it steer better with a sidecar attached, I cant see how increasing the rake angle by fitting chopper type triple trees is likely to help with this?

    Would have thought increasing the angle also means much more trail, and means bikes handle worse than with the stock triple trees?
    #9
  10. jaydmc

    jaydmc Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Oddometer:
    1,868
    Take another look at the rake and trail calculator, When the front wheel is moved forward with out changing the angle at the steering head (which would require cutting and welding or "raked" bearing cups) you are moving the axle closer to the line that is drawn from the steering head which leaves you with less trail making for lighter steering. Changing the "rake" if it is done at the frame as it would be with cups or cutting and welding on the frame not only moves the line from the steering head to the ground forward but it also moves the axle making for little change in trail.
    Jay G
    DMC sidecars
    866-638-1793
    #10
  11. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,779
    Interesting.................I would have thought raking the yokes, would have resulted in steering flopping over in one direction or the other, when the bar's are turned, in pretty much the same way as you would get with a chopper?

    Steepening the steering angle by altering the frame itself, tends to mean much more positive steering on older style bikes, many of which have much more rake than a modern sports machine.
    #11
  12. ChuckS

    ChuckS Adventurer Wannabe

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Oddometer:
    846
    Location:
    Too Close to Detroit
    I returned today from an almost 1800 mile trip with my girlfriend. Around town or solo, my K1100/Ural works great. Heavily loaded and racking up miles, I get weary. Time for me to research the options.
    #12
    brstar likes this.
  13. Prmurat

    Prmurat Long timer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Oddometer:
    4,710
    Location:
    No where
    So no explanations on price difference?
    #13
  14. GreatWhiteNorth

    GreatWhiteNorth Long timer

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Oddometer:
    6,276
    Location:
    Winterpeg - site of flatness beyond belief
    Leading links are (usually) waaay more expensive than modified triple trees.
    #14
  15. Prmurat

    Prmurat Long timer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Oddometer:
    4,710
    Location:
    No where
    Does anyone know what the size of the extension (fork tubes) offered with the raked trees from Champion?
    #15
  16. hsblue

    hsblue Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Oddometer:
    109
    Location:
    P.R. of Maryland
    #16
  17. claude

    claude Sidecar Jockey

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Oddometer:
    5,756
    Location:
    Middleburg, Pa. (Snyder County)
    I really wish the term 'Raked trees' had never come about. It has created some confusion. The term 'rake' should have really stayed reserved for the steering head angle as Jay alluded to. Just an opinion of course. Click here for a picture that will also help to explain rake and trail:
    http://sidestrider.com/leadingfork.html
    #17