![]() |
|
|
10-17-2012, 09:58 AM
|
#1 |
|
Urban Redneck
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: The Valley eh
Oddometer: 2,103
|
2013 RAM 1500 with Pentastar V6
My mini-truck (Honda Ridgeline) is getting old and tired and I'm looking at replacing it with a full size truck. Gas mileage is a big sticking point for me as I put on allot miles per year. The new Ram is appealing with the 8 speed Penastar engine as their "eco" choice vs the ecoboost that ford offers.
The question I have is what is the reliability factor like with Ram trucks ?, I've never owned a dodge product and actually can't even believe I'm considering one as I grew up in a 'chevy' family. Also, what are your thoughts on a V6 in a full size truck? I pull a boat 10 miles, twice a year and that is the extent of my towing.
__________________
You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky. ------------------------------------------- Thinking of getting a Smugmug account? Enter discount coupon # wjRsIxF94KorI |
|
|
10-17-2012, 10:03 AM
|
#2 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Tampa
Oddometer: 10,906
|
The v6 has plenty of power--more than any options available in most trucks in the 1990s. You'll have to rev its gutts out to go anywhere in a hurry, but that's what the 8 gears are for.
The ecoboost v6 has monster torque, so you don't have to rev its gutts out--it's more like a big block or big displacement turbo diesel in terms of its power curve, so it'd be a lot different driving it vs the pentstar. The Pentstar would be comparable to ford's N/A 3.7L v6. Older Rams were pretty horrid for reliability but I think from mid 2000s up aren't too bad.
__________________
'09 Buell XB12XT, TL1000S, H1F, M620, CR250R, DR250SE, XR650R, Cota 315R Summer 2009 Ride Report http://advrider.com/forums/showthrea...1509c&t=507038 Summer 2008 RR. http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=367703 |
|
|
10-17-2012, 10:05 AM
|
#3 |
|
Remastered Classic
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: San Antonio
Oddometer: 4,717
|
I have an '08 Dakota with a V-6, it's been stone reliable so far. Nothing but regular oil changes and new tires and brakes as required.
Nothing has fallen off, but it has developed a bit of a rattle somewhere in the back I haven't quite pinned down yet. The turn signals act up every now and then, but a quick "shake" of the steering wheel adjustment sorts it out and they work just fine for another few months or so. That is about par for Dodge trucks. Mechanically very tough, electronics not so much.
__________________
There. Their. They're not the same. (By reading this, you have briefly given me control of your thoughts) When life gives you melons, you might be dyslexic. |
|
|
10-17-2012, 11:33 AM
|
#4 |
|
ADVenture Capitalist
|
I've had 95/97/93/03/04 trucks with V-6 power. 3 Chevy 4.3's, a Ford 300, and a Ford 4.2.
Honestly, you'll be fine with a V-6 for your intended usage. In my experience, I've gotten as good (if not better) fuel economy from the smaller V8 motors, and a negligible difference with the 5.3 (displacement on demand) in my 08 Silverado over the 4.8 that was in my 2005 Silverado. The 05 had 3.23 gears and the 08 has 3.73 gears. Both with (slightly) oversize wheel/tire combo. However, I would find out if the Pentastar motor is the same one having cylinder head problems in the 2012 Jeeps. Also, a close friend traded in his 4 month old Ecoboost for a V-8 Dodge to get better "around town" mileage. I tried to get him to wait until the tuners and intakes hit the market, but he wouldn't listen. He was in/out of the truck constantly as a roofing sales rep. YMMV yadda yadda. Small V-8, I hate Dodge except the 5.9 Cummins, etc
__________________
Not an ACTUAL motorcyclist |
|
|
10-17-2012, 11:38 AM
|
#5 |
|
Trolljegeren
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Sandoval, Nuevo Mexico
Oddometer: 32,672
|
I know Ca Stu has reported good reliability with his newish Dodge 1500. I wouldn't be shocked if you stay in the same (if not slightly better) gas mileage range as with your Ridgeline.
__________________
They're nihilists, Donny, nothing to be afraid of. Moderator:CSM/JoMomma/ShinyThings/Sports |
|
|
10-17-2012, 12:34 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
Urban Redneck
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: The Valley eh
Oddometer: 2,103
|
Quote:
According to this site, I'll be better off to the tune of 1000.00/yr vs a V8 MPG Linky Quote:
Good to hear you're happy with the reliability...I hear such mixed reviews on RAM trucks and personally, I don't know very many owners.
__________________
You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky. ------------------------------------------- Thinking of getting a Smugmug account? Enter discount coupon # wjRsIxF94KorI |
||
|
|
10-17-2012, 12:43 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Thanks
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Oddometer: 42,779
|
Quote:
Worst problem I had was with my 2001 2500 Cummins 5.9. VP-44 pump shit the bed, cost me ~$1650 to fix. Dodge wouldn't warranty it because I put a Banks kit on it, Banks claimed the kit wouldn't void the warranty and then refused to honor that claim. No help or customer support at all from them. ![]() I suppose that is more of a Banks problem than a Dodge problem. I had a really bad experience with Banks, I'll never spend another dime with those turkeys.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6cxNR9ML8k |
|
|
|
10-17-2012, 01:03 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Thanks
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Oddometer: 42,779
|
Quote:
However, I think the 2013 Hemi truck is supposed to get significantly better mpg than the 2012... This is a decent page featuring the 2013 Rams: http://www.allpar.com/model/ram/2013-ram.html
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6cxNR9ML8k |
|
|
|
10-17-2012, 11:29 AM
|
#9 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: NW AB
Oddometer: 2,986
|
The Ram looks like it could be pretty good but that pentastar has had some real teething issues.
There have been discussions about Fiat/Chrysler quality and dependability here before but with the lemon laws in the U.S. and better warranties, I'd say if you like the truck, go for it. Having said that, we recently went shopping for a new family truck. Chev was out of the question because of price and the fact that my back hasn't met a Chev seat it likes since they went away from the one piece bench. Toyota, as much as I love them, was also priced out of range. That left Ford and Dodge. We ended up with an XTR Supercrew with the ecoboost. Ford offered more comfort, space and features than the comparably priced Ram. Electric adjust pedals rock when your wife is 5'2". |
|
|
10-17-2012, 11:58 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Thanks
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Oddometer: 42,779
|
Quote:
Constantly 15 mpg overall, 22 on the highway. Not a big fan of V6 in a full size truck, not too up on the new numbers but in the past they haven't seemed to provide any meaningful mpg benefit over a V8. I suppose that it depends on the initial cost. ![]() I do know I've never wished I had less power. My experience with Dodge is pretty much the norm, I think. Very reliable and solid mechanically, never let me down. Minor interior trim issues (plating on the plastic shift knob flaking off, asshole car wash knocked off some sound insulation on the heater/blower). I never keep a daily driver beyond about 80k miles, I definitely like the looks of the 2013 Ram and may pick one up next year. Also, the new tech on the 2013 is neat. Automatic air ride height adjustability, louvers on the grille that close at speed for better aerodynamics, good stuff. http://www.ramtrucks.com/en/ I will say this, though. I know 2 guys who have bought Ford Raptors, and they are bad ass.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6cxNR9ML8k CA Stu screwed with this post 10-17-2012 at 12:54 PM |
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 11:25 AM
|
#11 | |
|
The 906
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH ; Houghton, MI
Oddometer: 3,281
|
Quote:
I believe at least. Any other distinguishing features?
__________________
“I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." 2009 KLX250S 2005 Bandit 1200S |
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 05:09 PM
|
#12 |
|
suck-squeeze-bang-blow
|
I have a 2011 Ram 1500 quad cab 4x4 with the 4.7 V8 (non-hemi). It just turned over 40k miles with no problem. I've been averaging 20 mpg overall, but I live out in the middle of nowhere with no traffic. I really like the truck, but I don't think I'd go for the V6 myself unless the mileage was significantly better and had comparable power to a V8. These are heavy trucks, it makes me wonder how hard a V6 would have to work, even with the 8-speed tranny.
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. |
|
|
11-01-2012, 10:01 PM
|
#13 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Cincinnati OH/Stuart FL
Oddometer: 1,253
|
I love my '11 ram 1500. The 5.7 is fantastic, but the problem is its a little too much fun around town. If I never did anything but drive n the highway I'd probably be able to get 22 out of it, but honestly around town it's more like 15-16.
|
|
|
01-09-2013, 08:27 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Silesian American
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: North Tulsa where adventures happen every day
Oddometer: 1,228
|
Quote:
As far as reliability goes you won't be dissapointed. Below is a pic of my 2002 1500 with 190K miles. It' a 3.7 V6 standard< Never had a problem with it (just normal wear and tear: brakes at 100K, shocks at 120K, U-joints at 140K, clutch at 150K, front hubs at 170K). Original battery lasted 9 years and I havent had to replace the exhaust system yet. Here itis with 100 treated 2x4s, 600 fence boards and a few treated fence posts - yes it's a work truck edition
__________________
Present: '83 R80RT, '98 VFR800 project Golas, '01 DRM650, '06 TRX680, '06 DL650 Wee, '06 CBR1000RR Past: '82 XT550, '02 CBR954RR |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|