![]() |
04-03-2012, 10:22 AM
|
#1 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Oddometer: 433
|
TY250 vs. TY350
OK folks anyone have an opinion?
__________________
"Can't never could."-Grandma Belle Marie Bullock-Shuflin |
|
|
04-03-2012, 05:13 PM
|
#2 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: nm
Oddometer: 860
|
You would have to say what you are trying to compare. As far as U.S. models they were years apart.
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 05:55 PM
|
#3 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Oddometer: 433
|
Sorry folks, but one of each has come up locally for sale and I was
just wondering which one would be the better bike? Pros and cons for each. I presently have a TLR200 but am led to believe that any of the TY's were a better trials bike.
__________________
"Can't never could."-Grandma Belle Marie Bullock-Shuflin |
|
|
04-03-2012, 06:22 PM
|
#4 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: s.e.minnesota
Oddometer: 391
|
IF THE 250 IS THE WATERCOOLED MONO SHOCK THAT OVER THE 350.
IF THE 250 IS AIR COOLED TWIN SHOCK THE MONO SHOCK 350 WOULD BE THE ONE. OF COURSE THE CONDITION OF EACH BIKE WOULD BE THE BIG FACTOR. THOUGH THE TLR MAYBE THE BETTER BIKE OF THE BUNCH. MY .03 CENTS WORTH ![]() ![]() ![]() I HAVE OWNED ALL 3 OF THEM. AND LIKE THE REFLEX |
|
|
04-03-2012, 06:25 PM
|
#5 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: nm
Oddometer: 860
|
The ty 350 is the better bike by far. They were made in 85` and `86. The `86 was the best year. The TLR can be made to be better, but will always be under powered and too heavy.
P.S. I just rode a tlr sunday in our vintage class and it is a pig. |
|
|
04-04-2012, 12:59 AM
|
#6 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jan 2012
Oddometer: 1,073
|
Mick Andrews and Nigel Birkett both of whom were involved with developing the TY mono, only ever used to ride modified 250's, and it seems strange that if the 350 was the better of the 2 bikes, that they were never imported into Europe, which has perhaps the biggest world market for trials machinery?
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 04:23 AM
|
#7 |
|
gooligan
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Dubuque, Iowa
Oddometer: 4,384
|
At that age, I would say the only thing that matters is the condition of the bike and parts availability.
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 06:34 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Buffoonery, Inc.
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM.
Oddometer: 2,312
|
Quote:
So did I. And yes, it is a pig.
__________________
Work hard. Play hard. Team Dead End. The drinking team with a Trials problem. ![]() 2-Time winner of the coveted "Best Shenanigans" award at Capt. Rick's annual BBQ. |
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 07:34 AM
|
#9 | |
|
Professional Idiot
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: North East, MD
Oddometer: 956
|
Quote:
motojunky screwed with this post 04-04-2012 at 01:22 PM |
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 08:26 AM
|
#10 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Oddometer: 433
|
Oh geeeeez. And now to make matters even more confusing.........a friend
just offered up a 70's Montesa 123. What to do, what to do????
__________________
"Can't never could."-Grandma Belle Marie Bullock-Shuflin |
|
|
04-04-2012, 09:56 AM
|
#11 | |
|
roost maker
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Frosbite Falls
Oddometer: 1,230
|
Quote:
We had both models in the Great White North and I had friends with each of them. The general preference (if memory serves me) was for the 250, being lighter and handier feeling for most. Easier to start too! A few of us on the larger side preferred the grunt of the 350, so I expect like so many such comparisons it would come down to individual preference. |
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 01:13 PM
|
#12 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jan 2012
Oddometer: 1,073
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 01:53 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Oddometer: 2,037
|
Quote:
I can't imagine a lot of them were sold, but there are a few still around. They did look pretty trick at the time compared to the older twinshockers I had ridden before...not the reaction you get now after looking at today's offerings! Still, it would be nice to have one even now for local club trials and air-cooled vintage events...with parts availability and reliability being a big plus over some older types I expect.
|
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 01:56 PM
|
#14 |
|
LDA
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR / Moss Beach, CA
Oddometer: 211
|
|
|
|
04-05-2012, 08:27 AM
|
#15 | |
|
roost maker
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Frosbite Falls
Oddometer: 1,230
|
Quote:
![]() The TYZ is even more rare I expect, but just saw one for sale. I think the parts and riding options are better for the older bike however. While both are obsolete trials bikes, the former is still capable AND eligable for some vintage classes! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|