Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Road Warriors
User Name
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-25-2012, 03:49 PM   #1
Superzoom OP
Studly Adventurer
Superzoom's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto
Oddometer: 582
Your favourite/least favourite motorcycle magazine, and why.

My two year subscription to Motorcyclist is about to expire, and I have no intention of renewing it. I think it's a dull publication. I'd like to hear from people here what magazines they read and love, or have read and really disliked. I'm going to subscribe to a new magazine based on your input. And I like hearing criticism of bad things, because, who doesn't?

So to start off, I don't have a favourite, hence why I'm asking you guys. For my least favourite, I guess it's the one I'm reading now, Motorcyclist. Here's what I don't like about Motorcyclist:

- It's absolutely chock full of boring, one-page editorials that feel like they were written the day before they were due. Lots of reminiscing about first bikes, buying used bikes, new technology, old technology, the bike that got away, etc, etc. Nothing wrong with that, but you've gotta have a good story to tell, and you've got to tell it well. That seldom happens. And if you're going to ramble on about something I barely care about, put in some interesting pictures!

- They include a few token cruiser reviews, usually written by some guy who hates cruisers.

- They have more and more articles on electric bikes and scooters. I shouldn't mind that, but I often just skip or skim these articles.

- They are full of really uninteresting insider news about the staff of the magazine, about who went to what show and who met this famous motorcycle dude from the sixties, and who bought his favourite 90's bike. Seriously.

- The last page is devoted to a goofy picture and half a page of really, really unfunny writing, often referencing someone from the staff (more unfunny inside jokes).

- There is a section called "Doin' Time" where they list off all the expensive mods they've done on a particular motorcycle that they are evaluating long term, and then they say nothing about how fun the bike is to ride, or where they've ridden it, or anything close to a personal, interesting observation about the bike.

Anyways, you get the point. Motorcyclist replaced their Editor In Chief, and I hoped for some changes, but it's been the same old boring articles in the same old template.
Superzoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 04:21 PM   #2
Studly Adventurer
EetsOK's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Kootenay/Boundary
Oddometer: 596
Yes, inside jokes in a magazine. You know they are not funny if the people reading them aren't in on them.

I haven't bought Motorcyclist or Cycle World in some time now. Boring BORING articles. I've also noticed (along with Cycle Canada too) a trend towards immature writing. I don't really expect to read so many "fuck"'s from self proclaimed professional journalists.
l never really thought of myself as a freak. But l'd love to freak.
EetsOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 04:56 PM   #3
marginal adventurer
Grainbelt's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Minnyhappiness
Oddometer: 27,166
Anything British is pretty good. That would be BIKE and TWO.

There isn't anything particularly compelling in the US right now unless you have a very specific interest, such as the ADV rag or sometimes Rider, if you catch them on a good month.
Grainbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 05:19 PM   #4
Beastly Adventurer
PhilB's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2012
Location: New Hampshire
Oddometer: 1,331
The only one I subscribe to is Cycle World, and that is specifically because they have two good writers: Peter Egan, and Kevin Cameron.

There are several mags, British and American, that I will get an issue of once in a while off the newsstand, if it happens to have multiple articles I am interested in (or if I'm in an airport without enough to read).

1993 Ducati M900 Monster "Patina" (236,000 miles, so far) -- 1995 Ducati M900 (wife's bike) -- 1972 Honda CB450 (daughter's bike) -- 1979 Vespa P200 (daughter's scoot) -- 1967 Alfa Romeo GT Jr. (1300cc) -- 1964 Vespa GS160 (160cc 2-stroke) -- 1962 Maicoletta scooter (275cc 2-stroke) -- 1960 Heinkel Tourist 103A1 scooter "Elroy" (175cc 4-stroke)
PhilB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 05:32 PM   #5
Beastly Adventurer
ThumperStorm's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2012
Location: St. Cloud, Minnesota
Oddometer: 1,118
+1 for Rider. I can identify more with their writers.
"Maybe you ain't in a rut, maybe you're in a ditch, way over your head." Don Marshall
ThumperStorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 05:33 PM   #6
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA
Oddometer: 2,630
Originally Posted by EetsOK View Post
I've also noticed a trend towards immature riding. (liberty taken here)
This is what I'm getting sick of. Half the pages are about wheelies, stoppies, triple digit speeds, pretty much everything that will land a hefty ticket. Talk about being irresponsible and blatant about it.

I also notice the brevity of the articles. Go back and read reviews from cycle magazines in the 70s, they were complete reviews, not 2 page overviews with thumbs up or down and skimpy editorial side bar comments.

I was really disappointed in CycleWorld's recent ADV bike comparison article, it hardly made 3 pages, barely 1 page per bike and no individual editorial comments, it was like it was written in an afternoon over coffee.

I don't know if it's a matter of budget or what, but it's becoming a joke to me. I recently received a promo offer from Motorcyclist who'd I written off a few years ago. They offered the year's subscription for $7 and that's probably what it's worth. I decided to give it a shot for that price.
13 MG Stelvio NTX, 09 Duc Sport Classic, 02 Speed Triple
13 Husky Terra 650, 00 Suzi DRZ400-S
danketchpel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 05:48 PM   #7
Jim K.
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: New Haven, Ct.
Oddometer: 1,161

+1 on the Brit mags. I don't know how they manage it, but BIKE & Visordown (in it's paper days) seem able to level real criticism, of both bikes & gear. Our mags over here (MCN excepted) are pretty much in the pockets of their advertisers. Any critical commentary is verboten. Flaws with a bike or piece of gear have to be discovered by the relative strength of the glowing adjectives used to praise it. In other words, the range of grading runs from A+ to A-. For some reason, the Brits seem to be able to call something crap & still keep their jobs. Unfortunately, BIKE costs $9.00 here, even with a B&N discount. That said, Kevin Cameron is worth reading wherever he appears in print.
Jim K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 05:55 PM   #8
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado
Oddometer: 499
I agree with you. I too want to hear what else is out there.

I did pick up a few issues of motorcyclist over the last year and I did like some of the look back stuff they did. The rest, meh.

Cycle World still gets my $ for Kevin Cameron and Peter Egan. I don't think I'm old enough to identify completely with Egan, but still nice thoughts on bikes & life.

2010 Honda NT700V-Red
KungPaoDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 06:09 PM   #9
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: May 2009
Location: Everett, Socialist Republic of WA(aaaaaahh)
Oddometer: 224
Cycle World

Well I subscribed to R&T just to read Peter Egan's columns. For him and Kevin Cameron, that's worth the price alone. I subscribe to Motorcyclist as well but really didn't like Catterson, seems like they couldn't take any criticism. I also thought it was funny that he burned his bridge when he left CW because they were running too many features on choppers and other non-sport bikes, but lo and behold MC does the same thing, and then even copies CW and adds dirtbikes back in. I agree that the language became too ahem "common", I cuss but really don't want my kids reading that. I like Gresh's column and Jack Lewis since they don't seem as full of themselves like the fulltimers.

For what the subscriptions cost, I think I paid around $15/each for two years, they're worth it to have something to read on the crapper.
I don't ride, I commute.....

'94 XR-L
'99 VFR
'03 V-Strom
xrcris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 07:00 PM   #10
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA
Oddometer: 2,630
Originally Posted by Jim K. View Post
+1 on the Brit mags. I don't know how they manage it, but BIKE & Visordown (in it's paper days) seem able to level real criticism, of both bikes & gear. ......... For some reason, the Brits seem to be able to call something crap & still keep their jobs. Unfortunately, BIKE costs $9.00 here, even with a B&N discount.
I suspect the Brit mags rely more on subscription fees for income rather than the US mags looking to adverts to support them. I suppose the higher price is what we need to pay to get a higher quality of journalism.

I think I'd be willing to pay more to get more in depth content, plus less sugar coated reviews. I really wish all the reviews/comparisons were done with bikes picked up at local dealerships. Too many of the comparisons are done with bikes that come from the mfgrs with tack on goodies or full boat upgrades. I want to know how the bike works as I roll it off the floor. If they want to do a side bar on upgrades/accessories, fine that's good, but don't include it in the main comparison with other bikes.

I really want some depth to the reviews, how many times have I read a review that included a passenger's opinion, or how hard is it to do basic service work, say change the oil, airfilter, or plugs. I don't need to see them do it, but have some feedback from Pros etc. How was the bike was to live with on a daily basis, not just blasting up some local canyon roads.

I don't give a rat's ass if it trips the meter at 120 in the quarter mile, but I sure as hell care about glitchy fueling, turbulent airflow, hard to deal with instruments/electronics, or how the bike handles with a passenger.
13 MG Stelvio NTX, 09 Duc Sport Classic, 02 Speed Triple
13 Husky Terra 650, 00 Suzi DRZ400-S
danketchpel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 07:25 PM   #11
garrett the nerd
Sprocket Protector
garrett the nerd's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi
Oddometer: 871
Another Peter Egan/Cycle World subscriber here. I do e-zines on the kindle for the rest of them, which at a dollar/month is pretty reasonable.
Certain, swift, and severe.
garrett the nerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 07:08 PM   #12
plays well alone
dogjaw's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: between the Ozarks and the Ouachitas
Oddometer: 3,231
Motorcycling Sports and Leisure; my favorite mix of articles, reviews, racing and writers from both sides of the pond... Bike also a favorite; would
like to subscribe, but right now finding at Barnes and Noble
By God, Woodrow; it's been one hell of a party.
dogjaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 07:35 PM   #13
Moto Junkie
KTMmiker's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: NH- Home of the frost heave
Oddometer: 143
Bike baby!

Been reading all the US rags since the early 70's. most of them have become pretty skimpy content wise these last few years. Now my favorite by far is the Brit mag Bike. Their tests are much more in depth, their reviews are straightforward honest and the best part really funny.
I hate paying 10 dollars an issue at B n M and would subscribe if I could. but I do it anyway because in the end, it's worth it. I do still keep Motorcyclist and Cycle World in the crapper. At a buck an issue it could come in handy in an emergency.
07 Tiger 1050
KTM 950 SM (Frost heave ride)
Past Flings: 08 990 Adventure, 05 Tiger, 03 Caponord ,02 Aprilia Futura , O8 Guzzi 1200 Sport , 08 Speed Triple, 02 Falco, 07 Tiger, 04 Sprint RS, 2000 VFR (Pretec), 00 KTM 640e, Bonnevilles and Tbird's (Triples)
KTMmiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 08:05 AM   #14
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Vermont
Oddometer: 704
I hated Catterson. What a complete suck-ass he was. If I never read another "motorcycle" story involving Rush or Neil fucking Peart, I will die a happy man.

I used to enjoy Peter Egan but now I find Jack Lewis and Joe Gresch more fun to read. I also tend to save Cameron's piece for last as it's the only article in the magazine that has educational value.

There is no US magazine that is worth the newstand price. They review solely from the perspective of a potential buyer. The entire review is designed to help you make a purchasing decision. There is NEVER anything about the ownership experience. For example, I don't think I've ever read a review that mentions how the headlights are at night, how the paint finish lasts under a tank bag, what the first service costs or whether a bike has quality fasteners. They don't talk about insurance rates, maintenance costs, recalls, potential issues or past problems with bikes until the new model is introduced. In short...they fucking suck. A US motorcycle magazine is nothing more than an ad slick paid for by multiple vendors.
JohninVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 08:17 AM   #15
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Malibu, CA
Oddometer: 1,457
Cycle Magazine, before its consolidation (and demise in 1990). Pretty good at not kissing ass. Amazing staff.
If evolution is outlawed only outlaws will evolve.
scrannel is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Times are GMT -7.   It's 09:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2015