![]() |
01-08-2013, 10:10 AM
|
#8386 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Tobyhanna, PA
Oddometer: 790
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
01-08-2013, 11:37 AM
|
#8387 | |
|
All who wander r not lost
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Soaking up the Southern Californian Sun.
Oddometer: 1,982
|
Quote:
__________________
I've learned to give "impossible" the finger as I pass it by. The only way to get through life is to laugh your way through it! Day by day, nothing seems to change. But pretty soon, everything is different. |
|
|
|
01-08-2013, 11:39 AM
|
#8388 | |
|
All who wander r not lost
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Soaking up the Southern Californian Sun.
Oddometer: 1,982
|
Quote:
__________________
I've learned to give "impossible" the finger as I pass it by. The only way to get through life is to laugh your way through it! Day by day, nothing seems to change. But pretty soon, everything is different. |
|
|
|
01-08-2013, 12:02 PM
|
#8389 | |
|
Wackjob
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: High desert, soCal
Oddometer: 795
|
Quote:
It's apples and oranges in a way, and probably difficult to follow if you've not seen the hardware.. The TW has a steel hub and the brake drum bolts to it rather than being integral to the hub.. In stock form it uses the same 110mm brakes as an XT, but swapping them is far easier since the TW setup bolts to the drum rather than being laced into i it. The larger 130mm front drum can be bolted to the rear hub, but this calls for a larger diameter backing plate. The hardware is the same, but different. Due to Yamaha interchangability we share a lot of components of the same dimensions and in a lot of cases the parts are identical. Nearly all the backing plates for a given brake shoe size are dimensionally the same but differ in axle hole diameter and offset of the brake engagement slot.. I've ruled out the XT600 and XT350 backing plates because the holding slot is too far outboard I have four candidates left and wanted to rule the TTR in or out rather than buying all four if I can. Sorry for taking up so much space with this. I'll return the favor if any of you guys ever need to know how many of our parts will swap with yours . |
|
|
|
01-08-2013, 01:23 PM
|
#8390 |
|
Wackjob
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: High desert, soCal
Oddometer: 795
|
Problem solved, got my pics. Thanks for indulging.
If anyone's into it there are pics of the process over on the TW200 thread. Thanks again. Lizrdbrth screwed with this post 01-08-2013 at 06:33 PM |
|
|
01-08-2013, 08:54 PM
|
#8391 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: Southern Illinois
Oddometer: 43
|
Winter sucks!
Anyways, if I end up removing the snorkel or putting holes in the airbox cover, do I HAVE to rejet. I mean, is it 100% neccesarry?
__________________
"Live for nothing or die for something...your choice." -Sylvester Stallone |
|
|
01-08-2013, 09:04 PM
|
#8392 |
|
All who wander r not lost
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Soaking up the Southern Californian Sun.
Oddometer: 1,982
|
Yes unless you want to run crazy lean and risk serious damage.
__________________
I've learned to give "impossible" the finger as I pass it by. The only way to get through life is to laugh your way through it! Day by day, nothing seems to change. But pretty soon, everything is different. |
|
|
01-08-2013, 10:43 PM
|
#8393 | |
|
Huh?
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Perth, West Australia
Oddometer: 54
|
Quote:
My bike was running ok but some things you've just got to try. I took the snorkel out & bike improved performance. Put the snorkel back in & the thing bogged & was unridable. Mine has a mind of it's own! Had to get a few jets & try them out. Ended up going a smaller jet than stock. Plenty of km's since without an issue. Mind you, it's generally warm & dry here. |
|
|
|
01-09-2013, 08:54 AM
|
#8394 |
|
Dodgin' the Ditches
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Boone,NC
Oddometer: 1,159
|
I just installed the large footpegs and Tusk mini high bend handlebars and "Wow!" I can't believe how they transformed the bike. The ergonomics are great. I'm 6' w/ a 32" inseam and the bike feels so much better.
The bike doesn't look & feel like it's undersized anymore. I didn't realize how much of a difference the handlebars would make. The little footpegs had always felt odd, but weren't really a problem on the street. The large footpegs really make the bike feel more capable, agile, and stable on technical woods type riding. I've only played for a few minutes in my "yard" (I live in the woods, on a mountain), but it was immediately apparent. I can't wait to get it out in the rough stuff. I might just end up putting the 450 on Craigslist!! |
|
|
01-09-2013, 09:30 AM
|
#8395 | |
|
Recreation Engineer
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Oddometer: 227
|
Quote:
Mine appears to be a minority perspective. (shrug) |
|
|
|
01-09-2013, 12:12 PM
|
#8396 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Tobyhanna, PA
Oddometer: 790
|
More help please... first off, I have 2 identical 2001 XTs. When I got them a year ago, they we re both sitting for 4 yrs. Carbs were extremely bad.got them both running well enough to ride. Biggest problem was hard starting and hiccups on road speeds. So now trying to get them to run a little better and have more power. I put 130 jet in one, removed snorkel, went for 40 mile ride. It ran a little better than it did before but not a lot better. I checked spark plug had a nice brown color so jetting should be close. So then I went to second bike....put a 130 jet in it and 42.5 idle jet..left the snorkel in....went for a 1 mile ride,....seemed to rUN good. Has the same hiccup as before and the other bike, they both also tend to idle high when you let off the throttle for a good 5 to 10 seconds. I have tried spraying the intake boots...no signs of leaks. So any help on figuring out why the idle is hanging or the hiccuping would be greatly appreciated...I'm getting frustrated so sorry for the length. The one carb was professionally cleaned so pretty sure no issues with that aspect.
|
|
|
01-09-2013, 12:36 PM
|
#8397 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: louisville ky/southere indiana
Oddometer: 564
|
Quote:
Yes. The stocker guys get 90mpg by staying stock, which is LEAN LEAN LEAN. if you mod anything that messes with air/fuel ratio or volume of air thru the system then you need to rejet. YOUR mpg will be 65 after that. Which mine is. And it's the difference is worth it to me for my riding preferences. Its all about what you do with your bike, how you do it, and what your tolerance is for what i consider poor-azz factory performance.
__________________
dirt bikes, vstrom, cruiser, etc. "what hurts, instructs" - ben franklin |
|
|
|
01-09-2013, 12:37 PM
|
#8398 | |
|
Occasional Partaker
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Woodstock, GA
Oddometer: 227
|
Quote:
:Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
__________________
2001 XT225 2003 XT225 2005 DL650 - Sold 2002 KLR 703.5 - Sold 1999 Valkyrie IS - Sold |
|
|
|
01-09-2013, 12:46 PM
|
#8399 | |
|
Occasional Partaker
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Woodstock, GA
Oddometer: 227
|
Quote:
If no issues there, I would re clean the carb with focus on the pilot jet and screw orifices. And all the vent orifices. Both of mine had that issue till I cleaned it very well. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
__________________
2001 XT225 2003 XT225 2005 DL650 - Sold 2002 KLR 703.5 - Sold 1999 Valkyrie IS - Sold |
|
|
|
01-09-2013, 12:46 PM
|
#8400 | |
|
All who wander r not lost
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Soaking up the Southern Californian Sun.
Oddometer: 1,982
|
Quote:
__________________
I've learned to give "impossible" the finger as I pass it by. The only way to get through life is to laugh your way through it! Day by day, nothing seems to change. But pretty soon, everything is different. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|