Utards whos riding what - Page 1291

Ryman · 02-01-2013, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pluric

No. It's like trying to put a marshmellow in a parking meter.

Here I come baby!

pluric · 02-01-2013, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryman

Here I come baby!

I'm ready for you sailer......

Roostre · 02-01-2013, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frog

Yup

Sent my $$$ in... see you there.

frog · 02-01-2013, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roostre

Sent my $$$ in... see you there.

Nice are you racing the 690 ?

Roostre · 02-01-2013, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frog

Nice are you racing the 690 ?

Yeah.

We'll see how it goes.

frog · 02-01-2013, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roostre

Yeah.

We'll see how it goes.

Awesome. As long as they dont go through dutchmans you won't have any problems.

KMC1 · 02-06-2013, 07:25 PM

Not sure if any of you guys have seen this, but there's a bill moving in Salt Lake to put Canyonlands under Federal protection.

http://le.utah.gov/~2013/bills/sbillint/SJR010.htm

http://www.ksl.com/?sid=23975250&nid=960

GISkev · 02-06-2013, 08:35 PM

This might break first trip out, but a 7" screen for under $200 on an android os w/ cached maps is worth the risk. On my dirt bike i'm setting up a 4" screen on a military spec rugged samsung rugby pro...

dieselcruiserhead · 02-06-2013, 09:46 PM

It's just a resolution and has no actual legal impact. A resolution basically means "we all agree on a statement" and that most likely it won't be accepted by the Utah legislature.

I will say that with the appointment of the head of REI to lead the interior department that there is a very strong chance that Canyonlands national monument is a very likely reality. The interests of the national monument is to reduce the amount of OHV trails/roads (goal #1 in importance) and to prevent mineral and oil extraction (goal #2, with potash being the biggest issue right now). She already has bi-partisan support from the oil and outdoors industries. Unless something crazy happens, she is likely to be approved as it currently looks.

We've been going through the greater Canyonlands proposal and it seeks to close 40% of the OHV trails. Let me repeat, 40% of the trails there. Including some incredibly important motorized and OHV routes that are world class and would be real losses. I'm a skier and outdoors person and I'm all for protecting Canyonlands and support some of the activities of the outdoor industry, but it's just too radical.

Anyway, our access in this area is in real trouble.

This is what happens when we elect radicals to represent us and to be the voice of the OHV industry for access: no one listens to them and they have no voice whatsoever.

Proud Highway · 02-06-2013, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dieselcruiserhead

This is what happens when we elect radicals to represent us and to be the voice of the OHV industry for access: no one listens to them and they have no voice whatsoever.

Radical or moderate, those whom we elect (barring the president) have no authority whatsoever on the subject. The problem is that National Monuments are designated by presidential fiat.

pluric · 02-07-2013, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GISkev

This might break first trip out, but a 7" screen for under $200 on an android os w/ cached maps is worth the risk. On my dirt bike i'm setting up a 4" screen on a military spec rugged samsung rugby pro...

Some guys just can't break the vicious porn addiction.

Get help Kevin, this is your ADVintervention. That poor, poor Ceilia. Tsk, tsk.

GISkev · 02-07-2013, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pluric

Some guys just can't break the vicious porn addiction.

Get help Kevin, this is your ADVintervention. That poor, poor Ceilia. Tsk, tsk.

After hearing about how they fixt you I'd perfer the problem to the solution.... just sayin.

Roostre · 02-07-2013, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pluric

Some guys just can't break the vicious porn addiction.

Get help Kevin, this is your ADVintervention. That poor, poor Ceilia. Tsk, tsk.

Gives a whole new meaning to the term 'tank slapper'.

pluric · 02-07-2013, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roostre

Gives a whole new meaning to the term 'tank slapper'.

harcus · 02-09-2013, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GISkev

This might break first trip out, but a 7" screen for under $200 on an android os w/ cached maps is worth the risk. On my dirt bike i'm setting up a 4" screen on a military spec rugged samsung rugby pro...

What brand / model tab is that? Looks good...

02-06-2013, 07:25 PM	#19357
KMC1 There is no spoon. Joined: Sep 2008 Location: Greater SLC Oddometer: 725	Not sure if any of you guys have seen this, but there's a bill moving in Salt Lake to put Canyonlands under Federal protection. http://le.utah.gov/~2013/bills/sbillint/SJR010.htm http://www.ksl.com/?sid=23975250&nid=960 __________________ Obama says adding $4 trillion to debt is unpatriotic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kuTG19Cu_Q&sns=em An Overview of the United States National Debt: http://www.davemanuel.com/us-national-debt-clock.php

02-06-2013, 08:35 PM	#19358
GISkev wwfsmd? Joined: Dec 2007 Location: UT Oddometer: 1,426	tablet nav This might break first trip out, but a 7" screen for under $200 on an android os w/ cached maps is worth the risk. On my dirt bike i'm setting up a 4" screen on a military spec rugged samsung rugby pro... __________________ --GoProHero Helmet Cam!--http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...y=utahkev&aq=f 5 deserts:http://advrider.com/forums/showthrea...3#post15462553 KTM 520 (plated), Wee-Strom (commuter bike) ADV Relay Rider (Cedar City 2 Beaver: 80% obscure dirt!)

02-06-2013, 09:46 PM	#19359
dieselcruiserhead Studly Adventurer Joined: Jul 2008 Location: Park City, Utah Oddometer: 932	It's just a resolution and has no actual legal impact. A resolution basically means "we all agree on a statement" and that most likely it won't be accepted by the Utah legislature. I will say that with the appointment of the head of REI to lead the interior department that there is a very strong chance that Canyonlands national monument is a very likely reality. The interests of the national monument is to reduce the amount of OHV trails/roads (goal #1 in importance) and to prevent mineral and oil extraction (goal #2, with potash being the biggest issue right now). She already has bi-partisan support from the oil and outdoors industries. Unless something crazy happens, she is likely to be approved as it currently looks. We've been going through the greater Canyonlands proposal and it seeks to close 40% of the OHV trails. Let me repeat, 40% of the trails there. Including some incredibly important motorized and OHV routes that are world class and would be real losses. I'm a skier and outdoors person and I'm all for protecting Canyonlands and support some of the activities of the outdoor industry, but it's just too radical. Anyway, our access in this area is in real trouble. This is what happens when we elect radicals to represent us and to be the voice of the OHV industry for access: no one listens to them and they have no voice whatsoever. __________________ andreshoumatoff.smugmug.com Grand Staircase Escalante (& Utah General) Road Reports Make it happen (all 7 parts)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: .
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode