ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Riding > Pics, pics, pics...
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-30-2013, 10:26 AM   #811
Geek
oot & aboot
 
Geek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: 8000ft, Twin Spruce Gap, Colorado
Oddometer: 29,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by VietHorse View Post
I definitely dig your "grunge" style of processing

Geek screwed with this post 03-30-2013 at 10:49 AM
Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 10:43 AM   #812
Geek
oot & aboot
 
Geek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: 8000ft, Twin Spruce Gap, Colorado
Oddometer: 29,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorzok View Post
question. if it's not cartoon-y how do you tell if it's HDR? seriously. and is there a differences between pics shot in HDR and pics that were post processed to look HDR?
One other "technical note" that might help:

EV stands of "exposure value". It is an interval of a camera's photographic exposure scale.

Outdoors with natural light - there is/are about 15 EVs visible.
The average point'n'shoot camera can only capture 5 or 6 EVs. (hence you get blown out skies when you shoot shadows or blacked shadows when you shoot skies)
An expensive DSLR type camera can capture perhaps 7-9 EVs. (hence why a good camera's photos look so much better than point'n'shoot!)

Say you had a really nice DSLR which could do 9 EVs.
By taking a photo at -2 EV, 0 EV and then +2 EV, you are now seeing 13 out of 15 visible EVs in natural light (you are adding 2 EVs below the normal photo and then adding 2EVs above the normal photo).
Pretty impressive and close to what you see when you are standing there - 13 versus 15.

This was the original intent of HDR. That said, it is difficult to pull exactly the data you want from each of the images (trying to get EV -1 and -2 and EV +10 and +11 exclusive data added into your EV 1-9 photo).
The HDR processing is supposed to allow you to pull the data from the 3 images and merge them. Because of the overlap in data that is visible in all 3 images, you often end up with "pop" because items in your image have 3 values that are all valid. How the end user chooses to merge (or process) this overlapping data is what determine's one's personal HDR style (the most famous perhaps of which was Ansel Adams way back when - and Trey Ratcliff in the internet age (and what most HDR images these days are styled after).

Ansel Adams was amazing in that he did HDR the "old fashioned way" with film!


Trey Ratcliff's style - made famous through his "Stuck in Customs" website



This is why when you look through this thread you can see many images that are very similar in style - they are using the same software/filters (i.e. algorithms) to merge the overlapping data.. and hence end up with something similar.

The same goes for tone-mapping (i.e. "coloring" a single image to give a similar style).

Clear as mud?



p.s. if you are interested in how Ansel Adams managed to do HDR pre-existence of computers.. you might enjoy this article:
http://ralphnordstromphotography.com...sel-adams-hdr/

Geek screwed with this post 03-30-2013 at 10:51 AM
Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 03:30 PM   #813
wingnut11
generally strange
 
wingnut11's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Twin cities mn
Oddometer: 645
Thanks for that link. I have always loved Ansel Adams work. I think his work really makes me want get out and see the world.
__________________
If you're thinking about it your just trying to justify it to yourself.
wingnut11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 04:46 PM   #814
VietHorse
Beastly Adventurer
 
VietHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Ho Chi Minh City - Vietnam
Oddometer: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geek View Post
I definitely dig your "grunge" style of processing

Thanks for the clarification of HDR.
I won't mess up here anymore, just watching, Promised.
__________________
.
********************
Link to All about VietNam

********************
VietHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 04:58 PM   #815
Geek
oot & aboot
 
Geek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: 8000ft, Twin Spruce Gap, Colorado
Oddometer: 29,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by VietHorse View Post

Thanks for the clarification of HDR.
I won't mess up here anymore, just watching, Promised.
You are not messing up in anyway - I look forward to seeing more of your work!

Do you have any more photos of this bike? :


I'd love to hear your post processing steps
Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 05:16 PM   #816
motocopter
Studly Adventurer
 
motocopter's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Location: Freemont County, Colorado
Oddometer: 531
I see HDR photos similar to water color paintings with lots of detail. All varieties and techniques are nice to see.

__________________
- marc

2012 Concours 1400 | 2008 Z1000 | 1999 WR-400F
motocopter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 05:17 PM   #817
VietHorse
Beastly Adventurer
 
VietHorse's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Ho Chi Minh City - Vietnam
Oddometer: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geek View Post
You are not messing up in anyway - I look forward to seeing more of your work!

Do you have any more photos of this bike? :


I'd love to hear your post processing steps
Thank you.
I have learned what is HDR all about for some years. However I am just a squid in photography so never taken any real HDR. Yeah, you right, just color blending to get it looks (somehow) HDR for fun.

My CX650 cafe racer build thread has its link on my signature. Welcome to see and comment.
__________________
.
********************
Link to All about VietNam

********************
VietHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 05:20 PM   #818
Geek
oot & aboot
 
Geek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: 8000ft, Twin Spruce Gap, Colorado
Oddometer: 29,657
Thank you for the link! I just found this pic in your thread; and it is inspiring. I have a 1976 R90/6 tucked away in the back of my garage that I'm going to do exactly this with

Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 07:59 PM   #819
Merfman
Trustin' my cape...
 
Merfman's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 726
Nighthawk switch

I got my project bike on the road today and went on photo safari...
Merfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 11:18 PM   #820
Dorzok
Beastly Adventurer
 
Dorzok's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Oddometer: 1,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geek View Post
Answer: most photos in this thread are not HDR.

.....


Because so many people "over process" HDR... the "overpopped" style has become known as "HDR"... but in reality most "HDR" photos these days are just tone mappings made to look HDR like; perhaps "HDR style" photography would be more apropos.
...


Hope this helps
I figured as much. Thanks.
Dorzok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 09:54 AM   #821
TxLoneRider
Gnarly Adventurer
 
TxLoneRider's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Tejas
Oddometer: 343
HDR or *not* HDR, that is the question I ask

Not to belabor the point too much. I've tried to pull detail out of a few images. Where I've gone into Aperture, and created 2 new images from an existing one, +/- 2EV. I've been able to go creative, get artsy, but never actually improve the overall image.

Here are a few images I've capture using +-2 EV (usually exposure time), that there is no way I could have otherwise captured what my eye saw.


from:



I've taken a few pictures of bridges, where HDR has allowed me to pull out the detail of the beams. With just a single exposure, the rivets on right side of the image where barely noticeable, as they where in the shade. Pulling in the detail from the +2EV image really, IMNSHO, gives the image a lot more interesting detail.



The following image could have really used +-4EV as well, but without HDR there is no way I could get the bike and the center tree/clouds visible in the image.


I've still got A LOT to learn. To all of the other posters, and to Dave for starting the thread, THANKS, for inspiring me.
TxLoneRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 12:42 PM   #822
Dorzok
Beastly Adventurer
 
Dorzok's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Oddometer: 1,663
That is a terrific example of how HDR looks. Thanks. I understand now why my vacation pics NEVER look like when we was there.
Dorzok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 08:25 PM   #823
TxLoneRider
Gnarly Adventurer
 
TxLoneRider's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Tejas
Oddometer: 343
From Nik Efex Pro 2

edit: I wanted to add, it really amazes me, the human eye can adjust fast enough, that when you scan over the surroundings you can see the detail. HDR makes it possible to see the image a lot closer to the way I see it.

From (-2EV, 0EV (standard), +2EV)


Gives:


You can see where the detail is pulled from each of the pictures. Not a lot from -2EV. In fact, a lot of the pictures, I do not include it. Especially if there is a lot of wind, I will just use 0EV and +2EV.
TxLoneRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 05:15 PM   #824
mattharris75
n00b
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Location: Huntsville, AL
Oddometer: 4
Fake HDR using a GIMP plug-in, taken with my Samsung Galaxy S3:

mattharris75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 08:45 PM   #825
hogdoc
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Id Ho
Oddometer: 255
Another one from the shop

__________________
http://hogdoc.smugmug.com/
hogdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 04:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014