ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Riding > The perfect line and other riding myths
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-27-2014, 06:53 AM   #16
DAKEZ
Beastly Adventurer
 
DAKEZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: OR
Oddometer: 19,545
I like THIS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rgconner View Post
Clearly the solution is to ban cars.
^^^^^ ^^^^^
__________________
“Watch out for everything bigger than you, they have the "right of weight"
Bib
DAKEZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 07:05 AM   #17
Chico
Thief and Saboteur
 
Chico's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Oddometer: 715
Gas prices increase in summer. More motorcyclists are on the road in summer (exponentially more compared to winter). More motorcyclists on the road = more motorcyclist deaths.
Chico is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 07:31 AM   #18
GlennR
Playin' in the Fire
 
GlennR's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Location: Boone,NC
Oddometer: 1,907
I don't see a lot to argue with about the article, it's just a bunch of stats.

There are a lot of ways to interpret the numbers, but I'm sure most of the data overlaps.

I found this " In 1975, 47 states required all motorcyclists to wear helmets, but that number has dropped to 19 now." surprising. Seatbelts have been forced on us, but helmets have become optional in over half the states.

There are many factors that weren't mentioned. "Speeding" is such a general term, but we all speed. 50mph in a neighborhood is much different than 90mph on an interstate. The drastic increase of the deer population wasn't mentioned, but the accidents they cause were real, counted, and factored into the data. Types & size of bikes and the skill level of the riders weren't mentioned.

We all know riding motorcycles is risky.
GlennR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 07:50 AM   #19
Telemarktumalo
Coffee Achiever
 
Telemarktumalo's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Location: Bend, Oregon
Oddometer: 217
Most motorcycle deaths because of riders

It is certainly tempting to blame distracted cagers, but the numbers don't lie. We are our own worst enemy on the bike.


Motorcyclist Deaths Decreased in 2013

The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) reports that the number of motorcyclist deaths in Oregon decreased by 35 percent in 2013. Preliminary data show only 33 rider fatalities in 2013, a significant drop from 51 deaths in 2012. But while the decrease in fatalities is encouraging news, even one motorcyclist death is still too many.
Oregon is similar to the rest of the nation in that half of its motorcyclist fatalities are single-vehicle events – crashes involving only the motorcycle. The preliminary news from ODOT confirms this: In 2013, 52 percent of fatal motorcycle crashes in Oregon were single-vehicle events. An additional 24 percent were multiple-vehicle crashes in which the motorcyclist committed the primary error.
In other words, 76 percent of fatal motorcycle crashes in Oregon last year were caused by riders themselves. While this may surprise some riders, these statistics are nothing new – this trend has been consistent in Oregon for the past 20 years.
What’s worse, most motorcycle riders believe that other drivers cause most motorcycle crashes. In a 2012 ODOT survey, 47 percent of motorcycle owners chose “Inattention/Distraction – Other Driver” as the greatest risk to motorcycle riders’ safety. Another 20 percent chose “Failure to Yield Right of Way – Other Driver.” As you can see from the chart above, the opposite is true.
While it is important for car drivers to watch carefully for motorcyclists, the biggest safety improvements in the future will come from riders themselves. Training, awareness and skilled decision making are what Oregon motorcyclists will need to survive.
Telemarktumalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 08:39 AM   #20
Rgconner
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Oddometer: 580
TL;DR version:

Don't be stupid.
Stupid kills.
Rgconner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 11:53 AM   #21
Kommando
Grumpy Young Man
 
Kommando's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Spacecoaster FL
Oddometer: 6,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by kojack06 View Post
Article didn't discuss increased aggressive and distracted driving by car drivers.
Correct.
__________________
Some are guard dogs of the flock. Some herders, search/rescue, or companions. We Devildogs are those, and also retrievers. Hell is our blazing dogpark, our frigid swimming hole. The fallen are our tennis balls. We don't leave the fallen behind, even if the master has to bring them home for us. Semper Fi, my friends.
Kommando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 12:08 PM   #22
bwalsh
Beastly Adventurer
 
bwalsh's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Hell town
Oddometer: 10,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by D R View Post
How much of the decrease in auto fatalities can be attributed to the vehicle operator having switched to a motorcycle instead?
Or, one could ask how much of the increase in Motorcycle related deaths occurred from people switching from a cage to a motorcycle and going out and killing themselves? PA also has no helmet laws.
__________________
2004 XR650L / 2001 R1150GS
NWVA TAG NWVA TAG MAP RTE THREAD & IN LIST



bwalsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 12:35 PM   #23
Bill Harris
Confirmed Curmudgeon
 
Bill Harris's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: backwoods Alabama
Oddometer: 6,735
I can see where there could be some correlation. When gas prices rise, noobs buy bikes, posers start riding for daily transportation and some who haven't ridden for a couple of years fire the old bike up. Noobs and people out of practice start riding in heavy traffic and they don't have the skills to make survival decisions. A dangerous combination.

--Bill
__________________
'73 R60/5 Toaster
Luddite. Not just a philosophy, a way of life...
Bill Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 07:49 PM   #24
Night Falcon
Adventure NZL
 
Night Falcon's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Nu Va Ze Lon
Oddometer: 1,616
if you have 100 motorcycles on the road and 5 crash that's 5% if you have 200 bikes on the road and 10 crashes that's also 5% but its 100% rise in crashes...yikes sell them bikes fast folks the statistician is gonna get ya

By this lodgic if you keep gas prices low, you get less crashes, this is erroneous data unless you have a correlation to the total number of bikes on the road - in that case the crash rate although grater in numbers could be a smaller percentage - but probably wont be
__________________
My KTM 390 Adventure - we live in hope!
My KTM 690 - RIP
My Rev3 Trials Adventures
Night Falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 11:09 AM   #25
genka
SUV hater
 
genka's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD
Oddometer: 1,507
Do these statistics include those 50cc scooters not even tagged and licensed in some states? People buy them for the promise of 100+MPG. The small underpowered scooters are inherently dangerous, never mind the untrained and unprotected riders.
__________________
.

Форум мотоциклистов в США http://www.xytopok.net/mvnforum/listthreads?forum=31
genka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 12:00 PM   #26
Andyvh1959
Cheesehead Klompen
 
Andyvh1959's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Da frozen tundra, 1.5 mile west of Lambeau
Oddometer: 630
Gas prices go up,.....motorcycle riding goes up,......crashes go up. And I sure wish the media would quit calling them "accidents" when in reality they are "crashes".

So. We need a bunch of researchers and the media to tell us this? Good thing all the brain power and expertise is out there to clear up the obvious for us. What WOULD have been more usefull to find out, is when gas prices go up and cycle riding goes up, how many of those increased number of riders have done things like:
1. Take a riding or training course,
2. How many of those riders actually RODE their cycle more than 1000 miles in the past two years,
3. How many of those riders are NEW riders, recently licensed or recently returning to riding to "save on fuel costs."
4. How many of these crash statistics are smaller bikes, or scooters, or how many are big/heavy bikes ridden by "once in a while riders".

Those kinds of stats may be more useful and meaningful. Then we get this kind of blather from a supposed safety "expert":
"With motorcycles, there's not much you can do to improve safety. They're just out there, hanging on their own," said safety researcher James Hedlund, who studies motorcycle accidents for the Governors Highway Safety Association, which represents the highway safety offices of the states. The best thing you can do is wear a helmet, and helmet use has gone down over the past 30 years," Hedlund said.

THIS FROM A SAFETY EXPERT!!?? Bullshit! Helmets help to save brains and reduce fatal injuries. But TRAINING and rider skills to AVOID crashes do far more than just helmets alone. This simply goes right along with the gov illusion that helmets solve the issue. Also, he claims "there is not much you can do to improve safety."

The HELL you can't! Safety starts and ends with the rider's attitude about how his/her safety and risk reduction is applied, and THAT is where real safety/risk reduction can be addressed. But he makes these useless statements in the public media and all non-riding, and a large portion of the riding public just take it.
__________________
When life throws you a curve,.....lean into it!
42+ year rider, 22+ year MSF Coach, Street, Dirt, Ice, ride em all!
Andyvh1959 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014