![]() |
06-18-2012, 07:10 PM
|
#66211 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: May 2011
Location: md
Oddometer: 1,168
|
Quote:
it's your choice, certainly. me, personally, i have had good results skipping unnecessary middlemen...ymmv, doug s. |
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 07:14 PM
|
#66212 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: May 2010
Location: Cincinnati OH
Oddometer: 24
|
isn't there one misfit who can answer my TM40 question from back on page 4419 or 4219 or whatever?
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 07:24 PM
|
#66213 | |
|
Dual Sport Addict
Joined: Oct 2008
Location: Redmond Oregon
Oddometer: 987
|
Quote:
Procyle answered your question I thought.
__________________
2011 DirtRoad650 http://i838.photobucket.com/albums/z...mping12182.jpg '98 DR 350 http://i838.photobucket.com/albums/z...t/Photo280.jpg '99 DR 650. Sold. |
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 07:26 PM
|
#66214 | |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Oddometer: 181
|
Quote:
Secondly, you are running too rich. I don't know the TM-40 specs, but you are going to need to downsize the main jet, or lower the needle. The AP might need an adjustment also. I'm not a misfit. ![]() around here anyway!
|
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 07:31 PM
|
#66215 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: May 2011
Location: md
Oddometer: 1,168
|
Quote:
http://www.suzukipartsnation.com/pag...FYpM4Aod5h241A i bet the race tech specs shown on their site are for the non-usd forks; maybe there are more options for the usd models. but, i'd certainly confirm w/any seller exactly what it is that's on your bike before ordering... doug s, |
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 07:44 PM
|
#66216 | |
|
Armature speller
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Kiwiland
Oddometer: 6,766
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 07:56 PM
|
#66217 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: on most ignored list
Oddometer: 1,116
|
It depends on where in the world you are as to what model years are what.
These conventional forks were the very last of the conventional dual chamber forks used on the RMs. The eBay seller didn't know what they were for, he'd bought them for a DR650 but they presented him with insurmountable problems. I picked them up for something like $170. The local suspension guy was duly impressed when I showed him, said they were unbelievably good condition and told me they were a 98 RM fork. I noticed when Googling for the same thing I can't find conventional front ends, only USD.. I can find similar to these up to a 97 from the US. It's entirely likely we still had conventional front ends on RMs sold here as 98 models. If I remember correctly, I've seen pics of Chad Reed racing here during and just after that era on conventional forks on an RM. I wanted a conventional front end to maintain the "standard DR" look, but get better suspension out of it. In the RMZ series, the forks were pretty consistent in their head set bearing sizes, and a match for the DR bearings until around 05~06 in the 250s. I had to use DR lower and the RMZ upper bearing and make a spacer for packing under the top clamp on an 06 set. 07 (dual chamber) onwards in the 250 were one for one swap out bearing wise. the 450s went to the different front end in 05, and use a slightly larger axle. The 250s followed, using all the same components as the 450s from 07. So there's a period of a couple of years where the 250s remained with the old gear, and the 450s got updates, then the 250s followed. Same basic suspension. In fact, I think spring rates - standard at least - are the same because the bikes didn't really weigh much different. The 450s tended to hit harder because they launched faster, so they upped the rates for super cross and arena cros, but I'm not sure how they were setting them up for the outdoor events in the US, given they are more open faster tracks and the 250s are generally doing the same sort of jumps. I bought a set of single chamber 06 forks and they came revalved for racing for someone about my weight (220lbs) and they had .48kg/mm springs in them. I went to .50kg/mm and they are about perfect for fast trail riding with the DRs weight. Clickers are set about 1/2 of the way up from full soft. You can experiment with oil levels and viscosities, as they are not fixed. If you want more damping towards bottom out, you decrease the air gap in the fork by adding more oil. Mine are at around 90mm from the top of the fork, fully compressed, springs out running 5wt oil. I can try 7.5wt to get more high speed compression damping out of them, and just wind the clickers off soft to get similar low speed. Increase the air gap with heavier grade oil to 100~110mm. So much adjustability your head will spin. You can get caught out with eBay as some of the sellers aren't exactly sure what's what. I ask for measurements of axle sizes etc to confirm. |
|
|
06-18-2012, 08:00 PM
|
#66218 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: on most ignored list
Oddometer: 1,116
|
Doug S...good find.
It's hard to get that info here. Unless you work for Suzuki or a dealer. Knowing what web sites in the US display the micro-fiche info helps. Just remember, static sag will be your biggest isue in setingup the front end. When you go for heavier spring rates you don't really want the same length of spring that a standard RM uses, you want it shorter. If you end up with a very stiff front spring and too little static sag, it'll slow the steering right down. Rake will look like one of those early 80s Dakar bikes. OK if you plan doing a couple of thousand kms on sand...and actually not too bad for highway work, but a bit slow for trail riding. Once again, it comes back to what you want to do with the bike. The Racetech rear sprung hard and set with minimum static and rider sag helps even things out, but you want to be at least 5'10" tall and confident off road. |
|
|
06-18-2012, 08:32 PM
|
#66219 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: May 2011
Location: md
Oddometer: 1,168
|
snowy, if you yust do a websearch w/the make/model bike, plus the word "parts", you will get a few places that have the fiche display on their sites...
doug s. |
|
|
06-18-2012, 08:40 PM
|
#66220 | ||
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Oddometer: 116
|
Quote:
The handlebars provide a similarly detached feeling on the DR, so I don't think I would mind taking the rubber mounts out of the picture. Quote:
But your opinion seems to match the spec sheet: the WRR leaves something to be desired in the horsepower department. I understand what you're saying, and that was my original thinking too before getting the bike, but the problem now is that I find the DR unacceptable even on gravel roads, so I wouldn't even dream of taking it to singletrack. I don't see the EXC being similarly unacceptable on the slab; punishing maybe, but I seem to have a high tolerance for two-wheel pain. |
||
|
|
06-18-2012, 09:20 PM
|
#66221 |
|
Asperger
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: So. Oregon
Oddometer: 2,047
|
johnkol,
I hear what you're saying. I used to ride MX, desert bikes. I used to ride off road. I then started riding street bikes. I was alway looking for high performance. I too wonder about the rubber isolated pegs. Kind of feels weird not having a direct relationship between the bars and the pegs (anywhere you have a direct "touch"). The problem I think most people have is compromising. Dual sport is just that. It's really compromising between the duals. You want good on road? You want good off road? Well pick the best bike for both. I'll be honest, really honest. I've been really disapponted with the DR when I want to just f*ck my buddies up off road. Then, we had to ride twenty miles on road to get back home for a bbq and they were all butt hurt with their bikes. Then, I wanted to ride 50 miles to a place that had 50 miles of exploring double track and they wanted to bring a truck with bikes and a trailer with more bikes. I said bullshit, lets just ride, get some gas and ride some more and they didn't want to ride 50 miles to get to riding and I realized I had the best of both worlds. If you "need" two bikes, get two bikes. If you need one bike, the DR is really hard to beat. Throw a 14T on the front and a really aggressive rear tire and you can go 90% of the places your friends will ever go. I want a 450cc off road bike (BTW, I tried to like a 250 off road bike and it had no top end), but right now I can have one bike. There is NO (no Berg, KTM, ATK, etc) 450 that will do what the DR650 will do, off road/on road. edit to add: "but the problem now is that I find the DR unacceptable even on gravel roads, so I wouldn't even dream of taking it to singletrack"...that's really an interesting statement to me. I really don't think you want a "dual sport" bike. The DR handles gravel and single track better than any "dual" sport out there. I have a spirited time on gravel with the DR650, but it's not because of the bike. It's because I'm used to an off road bike off road. On single track, yeah, it's the fact I'm used to a two-stroke MX bike. Last time I was out on single track with the DR650 (yes, real single track) I fell a dozen times. I had almost bald "dual sport" tires and a buddy with new knobbies. It's about the most fun I can remember on a ful size bike. He too said it was a blast helping pick up that greased pig. When we were riding there, getting a beer afterward and riding home afterward we were both thinking DUAL sport means different things to different people, but ultimately DUAL means more than one thing. If DUAL means only one thing (off or on road) then you need to steer away from the DR.
__________________
http://breakingbooks.wordpress.com http://www.kenmarshallmetalworks.com/ 2011 DR650, Fly Aero tapered bars, Race Tech front springs/emulators, RT rear spring/shock shaft assy, BarkBusters, MT21s, 14/43T, etc I may not be Rainman, but I'm not stupid eighter. Like Bartek on a taco. acesandeights screwed with this post 06-18-2012 at 09:33 PM |
|
|
06-18-2012, 09:58 PM
|
#66222 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: on most ignored list
Oddometer: 1,116
|
Try telling that to the BMW crowd.
![]() "The F800GS is a dirt bike. Yes it is too....I got mine dirty once". "It's an enduro bike, I know someone who rode single track on one...here's a video to prove it...blah blah blah" DR owners are at least a little more realistic. Either that or they learned early to avoid disappointment by lowering their expectations. ![]() ![]() ![]() It takes a lot of work to even try to pass a DR off as a "trail Bike". But , yeah, you can ride trails on a standard one. It just isn't a great deal of fun, more like hard work. To be blunt, 25 years ago I used to take my GSX1100EFF on dirt roads and farm tracks regularly. It arguably did a lot more of that than some of the F800GSs and other "Adventure Bikes" I've seen around. But it doesn't make it a dirt bike. It's not a difficult principle I'd have thought, but people seem to struggle with it. If more people on the web were open and honest about what different bikes can and can't do, I reckon there'd be a hell of a lot less guys buying the wrong thing and then hurting themselves. I listened to sales staff at the bike shop yesterday talking to a customer. This bloke owns a Goldwing, and he's just the ants pants. I listened to his tales of daring do and I think I tore an eye muscle they were rolling so much. Then he starts on about him and his mates and their Dirt Bikes - V-Stroms. OH_FOR_FUCK_SAKE....Stroms...you have to be shitting me... OMG. I think I sicked up a little in my mouth. But the way he talked about the of road exploits, you'd have thought it was Cyril Depres describing the off season testing of a new Rally bike. But a bloke looking for a salesman had wandered over and mentioned he was looking for a "dirt bike" that could do a bit of a long trip, like he'd seen on telly. You know, that bloke that was in Star Wars, and his weird mate....snigger... One look at this guy and I thought "He's around 50, off the farm or from a small outlying town, looks hard as nails and weather beaten, says he can ride...probably grew up on Agg bikes and XRs and the like..." and the suggestions..."Transalps" and "V-Stroms" and "BMWs". I thought to myself that the second this poor misguided bastard hits a fire trail on a V-Strom he's going to break bones for sure. I had to leave. Seriously. I've never heard so much misguided shit talked about bikes in one place. Unless you count the BMW forums. oops...did I say that out loud....oooh I'm a gunna pay for that one.... You can ride anything off road if you have to. It depends on you alone as to how well that works out. My DR is a Trail Bike, my F800 is not. I take them to exactly the same places. One very carefully, and the other not so carefully. |
|
|
06-18-2012, 10:01 PM
|
#66223 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Oz
Oddometer: 1,690
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers, Numbers 05 R1200GS, 11 TE630, 11 DR-Z462, 09 990AR, 12 R1200RT, 12 VFR800 Founding member Longtails SC |
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 10:15 PM
|
#66224 | |
|
Taumarunui..Darwin..
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: North of Sydney.
Oddometer: 2,110
|
Quote:
![]() Nice milk crate,I had the same model in Darwin but cut it down one level so it was sportier. I hate that word dual sport with a vengeance .
__________________
Les .. 1968 Husqvarna MF250 and MF360 - 1971 Norton Commando Fastback - 1973 Kawasaki H2A - 1973 Ducati 750 GT - 1973 Moto Guzzi Eldorado - 1974 Kawasaki H2B - 1974 Triumph TR5T Trophy Trail - 1981 Ducati 900 SD - 1986 Husqvarna 400 WR - 1998 Suzuki TL1000S - 1998 Suzuki TL1000S - 2007 Ducati Hypermotard 1100S - 2008 Suzuki DR780. |
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 10:40 PM
|
#66225 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Oddometer: 598
|
Quote:
I would be happy to do the ride with you but I am a leeeeeeettle too far away to make that work. ![]() You may find that it is something peculiar with your bike. Stranger things have happened. ![]() What about it fellow DR riders, wanna help a brother out? Any excuse to go riding is good.
__________________
Attitude ~ The difference between Ordeal and Adventure James JagLite screwed with this post 06-19-2012 at 07:47 AM Reason: spelling errors.... argh! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|