![]() |
11-04-2006, 05:51 AM
|
#1 |
|
Lost In Place
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Way Out There.
Oddometer: 15,975
|
Show Off Your Buells Here
Prolly one in the archives, but who cares?
I like Buells: They're unique and thoughtfully desinged by individuals and not committees. They're undeniably mechanical in a way that's rare in this sanitary age of mechaincal sameness. They're torquey in an instant yank on your sockets kind of way. They're even ecconomical and reliable, but don't tell anyone about that. Most importantly, they're designed by that rare breed of engineer who understands mechanical dynamics and reveres physics over fashion. The result is a chassis that works in spades. If you can't keep an early Buell running don't whine about it here. Go buy an XB12. It'll be more reliable than a BMW. So drop on by and leave a jpeg or two for those who "get it". SHOW US YOUR BUELLS!
__________________
Across Canada on a '83 R80G/S-PD Across Canada on a '71 R50/5 My Garage Of Doom Wear The Fox Hat Lornce screwed with this post 11-04-2006 at 02:41 PM |
|
|
11-04-2006, 09:04 AM
|
#2 |
|
Lost In Place
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Way Out There.
Oddometer: 15,975
|
'96 S1 in Mosport's Turn 3.
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 12:57 PM
|
#3 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Oddometer: 755
|
2000 S3 Thunderbolt
__________________
"Women come and go, motorcycles are forever." dlearl476 |
|
|
11-04-2006, 01:41 PM
|
#4 |
|
Lost In Place
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Way Out There.
Oddometer: 15,975
|
'95 S2 Thunderbolt
Nice S3. Nothing like a touring bike that gives the sporty bike boys fits, eh?
Gotta be careful not to smack em with the bags when you go by em on the inside. They never like that. Heheheheh.
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 03:24 PM
|
#5 |
|
Adventurer
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Ams, the netherlands
Oddometer: 50
|
Uly here
This is my first Buell.... i must admit I had some trouble in the begining..... but now its getting better.
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 04:21 PM
|
#6 |
|
is boinking your mom
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Tennessee
Oddometer: 1,560
|
My first bike was a used buell blast. I have no pictures but I wanted to support this thread dammit.
Mine was purple, had a shield, was a .. well it was a blast and was alot of fun for little money.
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 05:17 PM
|
#7 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Arizona
Oddometer: 446
|
I always liked the look of those older style Buells over the new ones. Those S3's are sweet bikes. I wish they would come out with something like it again, with better quality control, but they have so much sunk into the new design I doubt we are going to see much.
Still, I'll keep my fingers crossed.
__________________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! --Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 08:01 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Lost In Place
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Way Out There.
Oddometer: 15,975
|
Quote:
Here's my '96 S1 before it was set up for the track. |
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 08:32 PM
|
#9 |
|
Lost In Place
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Way Out There.
Oddometer: 15,975
|
And the same bike in a nice 4th gear right hander on Mosport.
These things handle like crazy which makes them an absolute blast to ride. A local bike mag journo raced a Buell for a few years and remarked that the front end felt like it was "welded to the track". He placed well in a national series and said in two years of racing he'd NEVER pushed/washed the front end. That sort of thing builds the kind of chassis confidence that inspires very impressive corner speeds. |
|
|
11-04-2006, 09:08 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Renegade Sickle Hound
Joined: May 2002
Location: Waco, Texas
Oddometer: 14,896
|
Quote:
__________________
Support the AMA. |
|
|
|
11-04-2006, 09:41 PM
|
#11 |
|
Bikes are good!
|
love the new firebolt. interested in that or the new lightning
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 04:04 AM
|
#12 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: FL
Oddometer: 507
|
![]() 1991 RS1200/5 Westwind Richy screwed with this post 11-05-2006 at 02:13 PM |
|
|
11-05-2006, 11:25 AM
|
#13 |
|
Lost In Place
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Way Out There.
Oddometer: 15,975
|
Richy, that's a nice looking bike you've got there. Is that a 1200RS?
First I heard of Buell was '89ish, iirc, Nick Iesnacht (sp?) of Motorcyclist magazine was testing a model similar to yours. It impressed me then as a clever approach to motorcycling: Mass centralization, low unsprung weight, useable power at useful engine speeds etc. That bike basically laid the chassis foundations for Buell for the next decade. And that bike was based on his race chassis that dated back to '83 or so. FWIW, It took the "Big 4" until the mid '90's to approach those sort of chassis dimensions on a production bike when Yamaha introduced it's first R6's. "Touring" through Mosport's Turn 1 on the S2. |
|
|
11-05-2006, 11:32 AM
|
#14 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Oddometer: 217
|
Here's mine after blacking out a few parts.
__________________
Live, Ride and be Merry! See My Photos Here! SouthWestRides - Enjoy the Ride, Share the Experience |
|
|
11-05-2006, 03:12 PM
|
#15 |
|
Lost
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Dbq Iowa
Oddometer: 54
|
Me too
I also have the Blast. After 2 days and 50 miles 2 up (at 40-50 Deg F), it really is a lot nicer than my KLR250 for 2 up and for going over 60mph. Oh, it still looks just like the picture in the brochure. At least until the new parts show up.
Paul
__________________
"My mother always told me you had to be very smart or very pleasant to succeed. I tried smart for 35 years, pleasant is much better." Elwood P. Dowd |
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|