![]() |
01-10-2013, 02:17 PM
|
#32416 |
|
bikes, booze, broads...
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Strangel Living West of Hell
Oddometer: 8,300
|
...yeah, we're baggin' on it here at the WR sanctum.
I'm sure it's a fun little bike. Just ain't what some of us think it could be... ![]() "Could it be that the return of the all-purpose motorcycle — one you can ride to, as well as through, the woods is returning? If so, Honda’s CRF250L should be at the head of the class" not
__________________
'08 R1200R / '10 WR290X/R '81 R100RS Rattlecandy Red '06 950 ADV Orangeboom '05 R12GS Wedding Bike '91 R100GSPD Derelict |
|
|
01-10-2013, 03:00 PM
|
#32417 |
|
Wannabe Far-Rider
|
Catch? There is no catch, except the extra weight and size of the tank.
I originally bought a Safari 3.7gal. I didn't like the added width between my knees, and I still don't like the idea of having a secondary fuel pump that could fail out in the middle of nowhere when you're counting on it. The main reason I sold it was it would take more gas than I'd want to carry as extra (more than 2 1L MSR bottles) to reprime the fuel lines in the wings should it run out. I now have and have had the IMS 3.1 tank for 20k+ miles, one of the originals. I did have problems with fuel weeping around the pump gasket until I switched over to the big honkin' o-ring they supply now with the tanks. Otherwise, no issues at all. On the highway I have a solid 140-150 mile range, on back roads and trails where I get better mpg's its closer to 200 miles. The bottles, which live on top of my wolfman enduro saddlebags, give me an extra 20-40 miles. Same width as stock, in fact its hard to tell its even there. Thats plenty for exploring back east, and plenty for traveling all over unless you start getting really remote. For the Dalton I brought a 2gal gas can for example. Otherwise, I've only ever needed the bottles 2 or 3 times and usually only because I skipped a gas station for whatever reasons (87 only, line too long for 1 pump, etc). If I lived in the southwest, where there could potentially be hundreds of miles without gas, I'd get the IMS 4.7gal without much hesitation. Might even still try to carry a rotopax, 1gal or 2gal, just to be able to get out and get really lost if I wanted to. Or stick with the 3.1 and a gas can.
__________________
"We wish your trail a long one" - Darlene "Sid" Dowd ~ Never run out of traction, ideas, and real estate at the same time. 2008 Yamaha WR250X - 1998 Honda Nighthawk CB750 Eastern TAT 8/2009 ~MD-Key West-Oklahoma 4/2011~Maryland to Alaska 3/2012 |
|
|
01-10-2013, 04:31 PM
|
#32418 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2004
Oddometer: 4,042
|
Quote:
__________________
My rides... 2009 Yamaha WR250X | 2008 Yamaha WR250R | 2013 Honda CRF250L | 2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250R |
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 05:08 PM
|
#32419 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Marion, IA
Oddometer: 4,572
|
Thanks, I don't like taking fuel bottles. Just a hassle. I have strapped a gatorade bottle on once since I knew I was going to be pushing it from A-B years back. I have yet to buy the bike yet, just planning farkle priorities. Of course the most expensive 3.7 just seems ideal for what I am used to carrying on larger pigs. Maybe I need to get over that fact. I am buying this bike to slow down my pace and do more site seeing than blazing gravel.
__________________
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday |
|
|
01-10-2013, 05:50 PM
|
#32420 |
|
amateur
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Oddometer: 80
|
I live in central Oregon, where gas stations can be scarce, and so far I've been fine with the stock gas tank. I do carry an extra liter or two in my wolfman saddlebags, just in case. I find that you can ride a long time on two gallons riding at a moderate pace offroad... unless your in deep sand, but in those conditions I wouldn't want a big heavy tank anyway. Point is, be honest about what you actually need.
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 05:55 PM
|
#32421 | |
|
Southern Ontario
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Oddometer: 1,978
|
Quote:
I think the best alternatives to the WRR for off-road dual-sport folks are the DR-Z400 for the budget-challenged, or 350/500 EXC for the better-funded folks. |
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 06:14 PM
|
#32422 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Oddometer: 321
|
My take on the 250L VS the WR:
My cousin bought a new 250L while I still had my street bike. Riding his around the woods was the reason I sold my SV and got the WR. After doing research the WR always stood out as a much better bike. From riding both I would definitely agree. The Honda is still a great bike, and I'm sure in a couple years buying one used will be even sweeter. But what it really lacked to me was power. It didn't have enough Mmph for me to have fun flogging it on the street. In the dirt it was OK. Suspension seemed pretty good even though not adjustable. If you are short the Honda is much friendlier. I just lowered my front forks and stock rear shock last night and I am still pretty much on tippy toes at 5'10''. On the honda I can easily touch the balls of my feet down if not almost flat foot. Lastly, the kickstand on the honda comes down super easy so you have to watch out if you jump anything because it can flip down upon landing cutting off the bike and causing serious problems.
__________________
2012 WR250R 2007 SV650 1984 XL350R 2002 CR80R |
|
|
01-10-2013, 07:13 PM
|
#32423 |
|
bikes, booze, broads...
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Strangel Living West of Hell
Oddometer: 8,300
|
...one word...18HP...
__________________
'08 R1200R / '10 WR290X/R '81 R100RS Rattlecandy Red '06 950 ADV Orangeboom '05 R12GS Wedding Bike '91 R100GSPD Derelict |
|
|
01-10-2013, 07:30 PM
|
#32424 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Oddometer: 321
|
__________________
2012 WR250R 2007 SV650 1984 XL350R 2002 CR80R |
|
|
01-10-2013, 08:28 PM
|
#32425 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
|
Bash3r's WR
Quote:
Hmm.. what to do this winter
|
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 08:37 PM
|
#32426 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 08:49 PM
|
#32427 | |
|
Beastly Adventurer
|
Quote:
The WR hasn't changed hardly at all since '08 so a year older WR is still, in my opinion, a much better buy than the newer CRF if you find the right deal on the WR.... I test road the CRF250L.. and for a budget buyer its a decent bike and fun, but no WR. But I'd ride one of those red ones if I had to.. I think I would...
|
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 09:04 PM
|
#32428 |
|
Navigate 2 Adventure
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Ramona, CA.
Oddometer: 2,106
|
__________________
Chris Crawford (Crawford + 4 kids = Crawdaddy http://www.CrawdadOffRoadEvents.com http://www.DualSportMoto.com http://www.WhereAmIRiding.com |
|
|
01-10-2013, 09:23 PM
|
#32429 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
|
Yea easier for say than others!! Hey it was in the 50s this week!
|
|
|
01-10-2013, 09:41 PM
|
#32430 |
|
n00b
Joined: Oct 2012
Oddometer: 6
|
My buddy just bought a crf250l, its actually a really decent bike especially for the price, we havent done any offroading with it only on road and dirt roads nothing crazy at all,the wr does seem quite a bit faster, he is roughly 150 pounds and im about 180 plus my gear and I can beat him about 5 car lengths, it has really good take off/low end but seems to die off in the higher rpm's. Im stock minus my smaller tire/wheels but I think a gear change and pipe for him would really wake it up,,,, I would certainly buy one, most likely not over my wr but its a great little bike in my opinion.
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|