ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Beasts
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-11-2012, 01:12 AM   #13846
Transalp1999
Adventurer
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: SVG, EWR
Oddometer: 13
Light mounting bar source

Quote:
Originally Posted by dfc View Post
I mounted mine like this



with a bracket like this

Where did you pick up that light bar? What year is your TA? I have a 1999 and looking for something jut like that for some Ridge Industires LED lights!

Thanks!
Transalp1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 03:56 AM   #13847
mas335
xendurist
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Piedmont region NC
Oddometer: 1,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belgian Waffles View Post
Been looking at upgrading the front suspension a bit. Comparing the progressive springs (~$100) to the intiminators (~$200). What do you guys think makes the most difference / is the best investment for trail riding considering the relatively cheap price of each. If the Ricors are that much better, maybe I'll just go straight to those instead of going with the springs only to want the ricors after all if they perform better.

Thanks.

BW
BW, I have used the Progressive Suspension springs and they are a huge improvement over the original oem springs, they greatly reduced the front end dive.

I have not used the Ricors but our resident suspension expert ( Ladder ) has and I think he is more than pleased with them, I think Ray is also running them with NX650 Forks.

If most of your riding is on the road then I am not sure just how much benefit you would get out of the Ricors.
__________________
Transalps
mas335 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 05:51 AM   #13848
Ladder106
It's a short cut, really
 
Ladder106's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Oddometer: 4,827
Good boingers are never inexpensive.
I'd start by measuring your front sag with you and your "normal" riding items, full gear etc on the bike.

The TA has about 7 in of travel in front as standard. If your sag is over 2 in. new springs are in order. Get a helper, hold the front brake, bounce up and down a bit then have someone hold the bike vertical while you put your feet up on the pegs. Forks can be measured by pulling one of the boots up and wrapping a zip tie around the leg. Push the tie all the way down on top of the seals after bouncing on the seat, then put the bike on a stand and measure the distance between the zip tie and the seal.

If your sag is still OK, then just the Ricors will make a big difference. However, if springs are needed, the Ricors will still make a big improvement particularly off-road.

Then, just when you think you've got it, you'll remember that you're running around on a 20+ year old shock.

Even after making the forks the best you can (without a total fork change) installing a Wilbers or some other good shock will make (forgive me) shocking improvements to the whole bike.

In the end, it really is worth it. I truly think that the reason some people go to a new bike is because their suspension is so tired or out of balance. Problem is, suspension is the first place builders cut corners so new bikes while having more modern legs still do not have quality stuff and the cycle repeats itself.
Ladder106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 06:29 AM   #13849
Hogberg
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Oddometer: 12
Hello,
I have been following the Transalp thread for a long time and step by step my Transalp -88 is transforming towards a more off road worthy tourer.

In the front I have a set of XR650L forks and recently I got my hands on a RD03 swing and triangle.

I am planning to keep the original drum brake rear wheel and spend my money on gasoline instead .
So a question to you who have done this modification:
  • Have you only removed material from the drum brake side?
  • Will the chain line be straight with the original bushing on the chain side?

Reason for asking, when I measure the swing arms the inner plane on which the bushing is resting on the TA it is about 1,5 mm closer to the wheel centre than on the AT swing arm.
My thought then was to compensate this on the bushing. Perhaps I am only thinking too much...

Thanks alot for all the inspiration in this thread

Best regards

Anders
Sweden
Hogberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 07:06 AM   #13850
Ladder106
It's a short cut, really
 
Ladder106's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Oddometer: 4,827
I don't remember checking chain-line when I had the drum brake on my RD03 arm. I should have done this and likely would have if I had kept that drum on.

I was able to switch to the disc quickly.

I don't think you're over-thinking it. After you remove the material to get the drum backing plate to fit to the aluminium arm, I'd certainly take the time to get the chain-line correct. Use spacers as necessary to accomplish this but also keep in mind that you do not want to move the wheel center line too much away from the center of the bike.

You may have to adjust chain-line by spacing just the rear sprocket a bit.

Only trial and error will prove how this should go. Sorry not to provide more exact data.
Ladder106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 07:52 AM   #13851
ravelv
from Baltic side of river
 
Joined: May 2008
Oddometer: 444
No, it will not. You have to use RD03 bushing. AT's bushings are different for each RD model.
I don't remember lenght, I think, I posted that measurment along with my detailed description how to use RD03 arm in TA some few hundreds posts back...
I actually shortened RD07 bushing on lathe when did conversation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hogberg View Post
...
  • Will the chain line be straight with the original bushing on the chain side?
...
ravelv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 01:03 PM   #13852
Hogberg
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Oddometer: 12
Thank's alot for your helpfulness.
Ravelv: I have read your posts. Looks like I have to get my hands on a new bushing.

Anders
Hogberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 01:17 PM   #13853
Hogberg
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Oddometer: 12
...or just machine down the original TA bushing (which is 19 mm wide).
The post from ravelv describing the RD03 bushing says it is 15,8 mm wide. :)

Anders
Hogberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 10:36 PM   #13854
Belgian Waffles
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Green. Wet. Oregon.
Oddometer: 869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladder106 View Post
Good boingers are never inexpensive.
I'd start by measuring your front sag with you and your "normal" riding items, full gear etc on the bike.

The TA has about 7 in of travel in front as standard. If your sag is over 2 in. new springs are in order. Get a helper, hold the front brake, bounce up and down a bit then have someone hold the bike vertical while you put your feet up on the pegs. Forks can be measured by pulling one of the boots up and wrapping a zip tie around the leg. Push the tie all the way down on top of the seals after bouncing on the seat, then put the bike on a stand and measure the distance between the zip tie and the seal.

If your sag is still OK, then just the Ricors will make a big difference. However, if springs are needed, the Ricors will still make a big improvement particularly off-road.

Then, just when you think you've got it, you'll remember that you're running around on a 20+ year old shock.

Even after making the forks the best you can (without a total fork change) installing a Wilbers or some other good shock will make (forgive me) shocking improvements to the whole bike.

In the end, it really is worth it. I truly think that the reason some people go to a new bike is because their suspension is so tired or out of balance. Problem is, suspension is the first place builders cut corners so new bikes while having more modern legs still do not have quality stuff and the cycle repeats itself.
Thanks Ray, I'll check my sag when I'm back home next week.
__________________
Always chase your dreams. Even if you don't catch them, you'll have a hell of a time trying.

Current: 1989 Honda Transalp, 2006 Scorpa TY125F trials
Past: 1999 KLR 650, 1990 Tengai 650
Belgian Waffles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 05:44 PM   #13855
dfc
Reluctant Cannonball
 
dfc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: FunkyTown
Oddometer: 2,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transalp1999 View Post
Where did you pick up that light bar? What year is your TA? I have a 1999 and looking for something jut like that for some Ridge Industires LED lights!

Thanks!
Its an '89. I built the bracket, not sure it would fit on a '99. I think I have a print somewhere for it, or could make one if anyone is interested.
dfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 06:42 AM   #13856
Dr E
Chasing after theory
 
Dr E's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Oddometer: 143
Ride height setups

Question about the rear suspension upgrade/setup:
I currently have a stock swing arm and shock (89 TA) and one goal I want to achieve is an increase in ride height and suspension travel. Assuming no change to the existing rear brake, wheel and swing arm, can you go with the following: XL600 or XL650 front forks (with progressive springs) and a new Wilber rear shock with the 30mm riser?

I ask, not as I am trying to cut corners on my build, but trying to understand acceptable alternatives that achieve a similar setup. I understand that if you raise height, you decrease center to center geometry on the bike, which in turn can make the bike twitchier in corners, and I am OK with that issue.

Thanks...
__________________
Life is the last thing you experience before you die...living is what you do every day to get you to that point...
Dr E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 11:26 AM   #13857
Ladder106
It's a short cut, really
 
Ladder106's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Oddometer: 4,827
As the swingarm angle becomes greater, the changes in the geometry of the rod operated brake also become more acute.

Coming from your background with the Hayabusas, you may not use the rear brake much in your street riding but you'll find you do use is quite a bit off-road.

The best solution would be to mod the brake rod pivot to be on the same center-line as the swingarm but this is not that easy to do on the TA. I thought about it for a bit but switched to the AT arm and rear disc soon afterward where it wasn't a problem.

If I remember right, increasing the rear height makes it necessary to run more slack in the rear brake giving more pedal travel before engagement or strong braking.

Carlos has kept his rear brake on his TA and might have more opinions or solutions than I can provide.
Ladder106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 11:43 AM   #13858
Dr E
Chasing after theory
 
Dr E's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Oddometer: 143
...good points for me to look at and they need to be added into the equation for upgrades. The issue of the rear brake is one I am cautiously aware of in that there is a translation from street to dirt and braking switches primary braking. I have been reading a number of posts wherein the utilitarian value between drum and disk has been debated and a few folks make an argument for keeping the drum over disk setup. I would base their differences are seated in their personal riding style.

My style will only cover minimal single track riding as my intention is primary logging roads, dirt access routes and two up exploring (minimal need for excessive braking capability as highway speed is not a huge consideration).

So in looking at alternatives, I may need to consider a structural modification to the stock swing arm (based on parts availability of a AT or RD03) and increase the length of the stock swing arm back to the OEM position if I go with the upgraded Wilber shock and raise the bike. This has not been an issue in the past with other swing arm mods I have done on bikes. Replacement would be the easier of the alternatives, and sourcing parts CONUS would be the most advantageous. I will interested in Carlos input and suggestions.

Thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladder106 View Post
As the swingarm angle becomes greater, the changes in the geometry of the rod operated brake also become more acute.

Coming from your background with the Hayabusas, you may not use the rear brake much in your street riding but you'll find you do use is quite a bit off-road.

The best solution would be to mod the brake rod pivot to be on the same center-line as the swingarm but this is not that easy to do on the TA. I thought about it for a bit but switched to the AT arm and rear disc soon afterward where it wasn't a problem.

If I remember right, increasing the rear height makes it necessary to run more slack in the rear brake giving more pedal travel before engagement or strong braking.

Carlos has kept his rear brake on his TA and might have more opinions or solutions than I can provide.
__________________
Life is the last thing you experience before you die...living is what you do every day to get you to that point...
Dr E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 12:53 PM   #13859
Iron_Floyd
BIG ENDURO FREAK
 
Iron_Floyd's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Location: Serbia, Novi Sad
Oddometer: 22
Greetings from Serbia to all transalp dual-sport beasts worshipers

This is my first post to this forum. I've been watching this thread for a long time, and enjoyed in pictures of your moded machines. I'll post some of mine later, but right now, I'm facing with some very high pitch sound that is getting from the front cylinder of my brother's TA.

I've recorded it, here is the link View My Video

Just have to mention that the valves clearances ware checked, and everything is sett by specification. In and exhaust valves are set to 0.10 mm ( this transalp is 1987 )

Can someone give me a help what this frustrating noise could be? Overall, the engine is working fine, no backfire, no overheat, no lack of power..
Iron_Floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 01:46 PM   #13860
wayne_l
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Oddometer: 176
Is this the same one for sale on CL in the springs here ? very nice by the way i always thought it would be a great fire road bike with more suspension ..

Sorry refering to the dakar black version ...
wayne_l is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014