![]() |
07-22-2011, 04:50 PM
|
#1 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Feb 2011
Oddometer: 443
|
Aerostich 'armor'....
I am curious what peoples opinions are regarding the armor used in Aerostich's gear is TF3 technical armor. Is this stuff legit? I have force field armor in my leather jacket. That material feels very good and solid. The Aerostich armor feels more like a foam cushion with a small piece of hard plastic glued to the outside.
Anyone have any exp. thoughts, input on this subject? thanks. |
|
|
07-22-2011, 05:09 PM
|
#2 | |
|
STILL Jim Williams
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Oddometer: 5,955
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
07-22-2011, 06:21 PM
|
#3 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Anchorage, AK
Oddometer: 1,641
|
American or swiss?
__________________
CW " Suggest you stick with failure analysis of Pork Chops " - -Benesesso |
|
|
07-22-2011, 06:50 PM
|
#5 |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Olympia, WA
Oddometer: 686
|
I low-sided in a Roadcrafter at about 25 mph on to my left hip and elbow -- no damage done (thanks to my cousin telling me to order the hip armor after he low-sided without it and paid a bit of a price).
|
|
|
07-22-2011, 09:06 PM
|
#6 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: The congested burbs 62 furlongs west of Brick City
Oddometer: 414
|
All I can say is I've seen the TF5 Transit back pad, and it looks a hell of a lot like the Sas-Tec back pad. But at a 2X plus premium in price. The armor looks Kosher, but that made me give them the side eye. But who knows? I am interested in the D3o armor though....
|
|
|
07-22-2011, 09:55 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2008
Oddometer: 808
|
Quote:
Aerostich shows the amount of force transmitted for a 50J impact, but TPro shows the energy required to cause the armor to pass more than 35kN of force (CE standard for 50J) so the numbers are not directly comparable, but you should be able to get an idea from the values reported for other materials. As a point of reference, Hiprotec Comfort, which is a 6mm thick Black Astrosorb derivative(First Gear), passes 24kN of force when subjected to 50J of energy. Given the above, I would take Tpro over aerostich any day-better coverage, less bulky, and excellent impact protection. Paying for a full set of Tpro is a different matter entirely. Statements in 2006 symposium about area (see page 3) Note values for tpro is from previous generation armor Averaged values for current Aerostich pads Forcefield values Joe Rocket pads |
|
|
|
07-23-2011, 05:21 AM
|
#8 | |
|
STILL Jim Williams
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Oddometer: 5,955
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
07-23-2011, 06:28 AM
|
#9 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: The congested burbs 62 furlongs west of Brick City
Oddometer: 414
|
Of course it is. Was it a special edition made with unicorn tears? Because if it isn't then that's some shady shit. I like Aerostitch and all, but when places price gouge for a product that's available from other reputable (Read: not shady "fell off the truck pricing" scammers) shops such as Revzilla for significantly less it makes me question doing business with them at all.
|
|
|
07-23-2011, 09:09 AM
|
#10 |
|
n00b
Joined: Jul 2011
Oddometer: 6
|
I ordered a 1 piece Aerostich, just wasn't for me. It was very bulky heavy and questionable on protection compared to leather anyway. I guess I am just not an Aerostich fan... One thing is you get a few days to return and you pay the freight. I returned and still am undecided on the best protection for the best price.
|
|
|
07-23-2011, 09:24 AM
|
#11 | |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Feb 2011
Oddometer: 443
|
Not for everyone....
The Aerostich products are not for everyone that's for sure.
I have a one piece. I've taken a few trips with it and I have also used it for commuting. It has it's pros and cons for sure. On the bike I really enjoy it. However, off the bike you are stuck in a one piece..... I now have their falstaff jacket. I don't think it's the most bomber piece of protection out there. There is a place here in San Francisco called Johnson Leathers. They do a lot of solid MC gear for cops and anyone else. They made me a leather jacket with armor. I stopped by there yesterday. For $130.00 I can have the force field armor with new pockets sewn into the jacket which I think I will do. I have looked at and tried on countless textile jackets in all price ranges. I really like the feel of the falstaff and its' simplicity. Jackets from Revit or the bmw line just have too many gizmos and 'stuff' going on. Danise jackets all seem odd to me and most of these brands have little or no armor. Some have good armor, some is a joke. Well. I think that if armor is in the right place and is quality it's about the best I can do. I really don't think that the armor provided in the AS gear is super high quality. For sure better than nothing and better than other gear on the market but not the best. Just my opinion feeling it compared to what's in my leather jacket (too hot to wear all the time). Quote:
|
|
|
|
07-23-2011, 12:53 PM
|
#12 |
|
Out of the office.
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Where the Ghetto meets the sea.
Oddometer: 4,947
|
I've crashed twice while wearing areostich gear
Once in darien pants and once in a roadcrafter. While wearing the Dariens I was run over by a truck, not much armor is going to protect you from that. That said I did have a noticeable area where the hip pads were and where they weren't The second crash was a canyon riding lowside, same deal you could see where the pads were and were they were not. Like helmet specs, you have to figure out a way to test them but it's hard to say how your next crash will happen, There's no doubt in my mind that there's better armor out there then what's in the gear I currently have (Both my Stich and my other stuff that is CE rated) I have noticed that the CE pads are stiffer and when off road and I crash while wearing my CE stuff I've noticed more bruising in the impact area then if I'm wearing my Darien jacket (This is Oly bushwacker vs Darien) What I like most about the aerostich gear is simply that I'm more likely to wear it, do to it being comfortable... Pads don't protect if they aren't being worn.
__________________
On vacation for a spell |
|
|
07-23-2011, 03:57 PM
|
#13 |
|
Man of Mystery
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Oddometer: 984
|
I am ok with their armor, it protected me well in an "intersection altercation" with a ford focus. Even though it has a bit of a homebrew look to it, it works just fine...but I would like to see more shin and forearm coverage in their TF3 pads.
|
|
|
07-23-2011, 07:22 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2008
Oddometer: 808
|
Quote:
I am not positive about the back pads and elbow pads however, so I would recommend checking. You may be bruising because your armor isn't working anymore. |
|
|
|
07-23-2011, 08:13 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Further...
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Oddometer: 5,146
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Oy, I'm happy that you're still with us!I love my Darien jacket and pants for their comfortable fit and overall practicallity for everything from a 20 mile commute to a multi-week tour. But that comes with the flipside that the armor is not securely held in place. I'm most concerned that the knee pads will be out of place in a get off. I'm getting closer to layering a fitted set of armor beneath the Aerostitch but that'd just be a PIA for a 20 mile commute. Bottom line: Aerostitch and its armor is much better than the unarmored leather that I wore for so many years. But not as good as maximum protection from form fitting racing suits. We're making compromises here. As for the armor itself? I'm trusting that it's a reasonable level of protection for a reasonable (35 - 60 mph) getoff. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|