ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Road warriors
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-20-2012, 03:12 AM   #3556
Mike Cash
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Oddometer: 121
Start with an empty tank. Measure out some fuel. Put it in the tank. Ride. Drain the tank. Measure the fuel that remains. Do the math. Get it within 2/3 oz and you have two decimal place accuracy. Nothing hard about it.

You guys remind me of a guy I once trained while driving trucks in the U.S.

We went to the truck stop to weigh the truck and he couldn't believe the scale read out only to the nearest hundred pounds, thinking that was lousy accuracy. I pointed out that on an 80,000 pound vehicle that was one-eighth of one percent. And since it was rounding up or down no more than about fifty pounds we were actually talking one-sixteenth of one oercent....0.000625. It could measure to the nearest EIGHT HUNDRED POUNDS and still be getting two decimal place accuracy. Even on a truck half that big, four hundred pounds is two decimal place accuracy.

If the testers were able to measure the fuel, by volume or weight, to within a fraction of an ounce....something easily done with no high-tech equipment....then getting two decimal accuracy is as easy as rolling off a log.
Mike Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 03:27 AM   #3557
Fuzzy74
Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: Central Georgia
Oddometer: 48
Would like to know which bike setup got which mpg? Transmission and baggage are huge impacts. What mode was DCT in?
Fuzzy74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 05:32 AM   #3558
dduelin
Oh boy that was close
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Shaft City
Oddometer: 1,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripletreat View Post
FYI, the December issue of Motorcycle Consumer News tests the NC700X. I think the editor exhausted his list of superlatives on this one. The testers love the bike!
I've read other tests that also are very complementary, but MCN has greater credibility in my view, as it does not accept advertising.
To pick nits, that article is a "first ride" not one of MCN's rigorous reviews. Look at the test of the KTM 990 in the same issue for the differences between a review and a first ride. I am sure MCN will do a rigorous review in the near future and it will probably do well. Rider and Cycle World both did in-depth comparison reviews in current issues and spent more time on the reviews than first impressions.

Edit for correction: I am sorry I was looking at the first impression review in the MCN Oct. issue. I'll look forward to seeing this full test in the Dec. issue.
__________________
Honda ST1300
Honda NC700X
Honda CH80

Dave

dduelin screwed with this post 11-20-2012 at 11:35 AM
dduelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 05:37 AM   #3559
dduelin
Oh boy that was close
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Shaft City
Oddometer: 1,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cash View Post
Start with an empty tank. Measure out some fuel. Put it in the tank. Ride. Drain the tank. Measure the fuel that remains. Do the math. Get it within 2/3 oz and you have two decimal place accuracy. Nothing hard about it.

You guys remind me of a guy I once trained while driving trucks in the U.S.

We went to the truck stop to weigh the truck and he couldn't believe the scale read out only to the nearest hundred pounds, thinking that was lousy accuracy. I pointed out that on an 80,000 pound vehicle that was one-eighth of one percent. And since it was rounding up or down no more than about fifty pounds we were actually talking one-sixteenth of one oercent....0.000625. It could measure to the nearest EIGHT HUNDRED POUNDS and still be getting two decimal place accuracy. Even on a truck half that big, four hundred pounds is two decimal place accuracy.

If the testers were able to measure the fuel, by volume or weight, to within a fraction of an ounce....something easily done with no high-tech equipment....then getting two decimal accuracy is as easy as rolling off a log.
Don't waste your time with the doubters. There is lots of fuel mileage information coming out in various places documenting the NC700X's mileage returns under a variety of riders and conditions. Any one of them taken in isolation could be challenged by a doubting Thomas but in total it is clear the NC700X easily gives high 60's low 70's ridden in a normal sporting manner. Mind the rpms and keep a steady hand to the speed limit and it can easily approach 80 mpg.
__________________
Honda ST1300
Honda NC700X
Honda CH80

Dave
dduelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 07:00 AM   #3560
Mobiker
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Missouri
Oddometer: 1,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by dduelin View Post
To pick nits, that article is a "first ride" not one of MCN's rigorous reviews. Look at the test of the KTM 990 in the same issue for the differences between a review and a first ride. I am sure MCN will do a rigorous review in the near future and it will probably do well. Rider and Cycle World both did in-depth comparison reviews in current issues and spent more time on the reviews than first impressions.
The December 2012 issue has a complete test. They still like it and averaged 60.4 mpg. Only 1 decimal place
__________________
'88 R100GS
'76 xl350
"Don't Panic"
Mobiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 11:11 AM   #3561
jcbrandon
Just a guy
 
jcbrandon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: high desert, Northern Nevada
Oddometer: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzy74 View Post
Would like to know which bike setup got which mpg? Transmission and baggage are huge impacts. What mode was DCT in?
Pat Flynn got 83.95 mpg on the fully-optioned NC700X with standard transmission
I got 79.11 mpg on a basic NC700X with standard transmission
James Pratt got 75.83 mpg on a basic NC700X with the DCT option
John Lewis got 74.68 mpg on a basic NC700X with standard transmission

Pat's bike had every factory option. The hard side cases and top box were removed for the mileage challenge.

I believe the major factors in Pat's win were the taller windscreen, his attention to staying tucked behind it, and that he is the lightest rider in the group.

John and I were on identically equipped bikes yet I beat him by almost five miles to the gallon. I also weigh more than he does. James beat John while riding a DCT bike and being the biggest guy in the group. I don't know how he used the DCT transmission. I suspect he just left it in D mode.
__________________
-J. Brandon (yup, it's just J.)
Treat others as you would like to be treated
www.americansahara.com
jcbrandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 12:09 PM   #3562
soderholmd
Adventurer
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Oddometer: 67
So cool to have the comments from an actual participant! What are your impressions of the bike thus far?
soderholmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 12:47 PM   #3563
jcbrandon
Just a guy
 
jcbrandon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: high desert, Northern Nevada
Oddometer: 17
If I were looking for a new bike and wanted to spend about $7,000 I would buy one. If I had $9,000, I would buy the DCT version.
__________________
-J. Brandon (yup, it's just J.)
Treat others as you would like to be treated
www.americansahara.com
jcbrandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 04:19 PM   #3564
rowdymoose
Carpe Diem-seize the carp
 
rowdymoose's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Marina del Rey, CA
Oddometer: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbrandon View Post
If I were looking for a new bike and wanted to spend about $7,000 I would buy one. If I had $9,000, I would buy the DCT version.
Same thoughts I had about 3 months ago...loving my bike so far! Do kinda wish I had done the DCT option due to the stop and go nature of my commuting sometimes. But on an aggressive plan to get out of debt, so couldn't justify the add'l $2k. Still no major complaints.

Thanks again J. for posting these comments...it's great to have insight from someone directly involved.
__________________
2012 Honda NC700X
rowdymoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 12:17 AM   #3565
Mike Cash
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Oddometer: 121
Since we do have a participant present, perhaps he could give us the lowdown on how the fuel measurement task was handled.
Mike Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 08:11 AM   #3566
jcbrandon
Just a guy
 
jcbrandon's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: high desert, Northern Nevada
Oddometer: 17
The bikes were filled at Honda headquarters in their garage. We rode from there and refilled at a public gas station. Cycle World staff refilled all the motorcycles from the same pump. To keep us competitive we were not allowed to watch the refueling and weren't told any mileage numbers until the end of the day.
__________________
-J. Brandon (yup, it's just J.)
Treat others as you would like to be treated
www.americansahara.com
jcbrandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 10:02 AM   #3567
Mike Cash
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Oddometer: 121
Thanks for clearing that up. Nice to know they managed it without dismantling the bikes.
Mike Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 01:52 PM   #3568
100mpg
This sentance intent
 
100mpg's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: ionally finished in this space.
Oddometer: 16,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbrandon View Post
Pat Flynn got 83.95 mpg on the fully-optioned NC700X with standard transmission
I got 79.11 mpg on a basic NC700X with standard transmission
James Pratt got 75.83 mpg on a basic NC700X with the DCT option
John Lewis got 74.68 mpg on a basic NC700X with standard transmission

I have a particular fondness for high mpg's... I would like to see a several day test. Head out on the road and cover 2-500 miles each day. If you can't get that together lend me one (DCT please) and I will test it for you. Thanks in advance.
__________________
"I'd rather wake up in the middle of nowhere than in any city on Earth" - Steve McQueen
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline 1-800-273-TALK (8255). DSI #694
100mpg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 11:17 AM   #3569
Fidl2n
Adventurer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Oddometer: 29
I am a n00b on this forum and VERY interested in this bike, but have a nagging question: equipped with the top box, must it be removed to put gas in, as some have suggested? I'm hoping to get a test ride soon at the local moto show. Thanks!


Blah, blah, blah, Tapatalk.
Fidl2n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 11:23 AM   #3570
rowdymoose
Carpe Diem-seize the carp
 
rowdymoose's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Marina del Rey, CA
Oddometer: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidl2n View Post
I am a n00b on this forum and VERY interested in this bike, but have a nagging question: equipped with the top box, must it be removed to put gas in, as some have suggested? I'm hoping to get a test ride soon at the local moto show. Thanks!


Blah, blah, blah, Tapatalk.
I've got the 52L Givi Trekker, and have no problem putting gas into the bike. The lid opens fine to the point where the lever will hold it open while you fill'er up. This is probably one of the larger top cases out there, or at least what I've seen.

I think most of the concern comes from folks who don't have top cases/boxes, and like to strap gear on top of the passenger seat. If you did this, then yes, you would have to remove the gear to lift the rear seat to access the gas tank opening.
__________________
2012 Honda NC700X
rowdymoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014