TAG; By the numbers!

[dirtymartini]

Paging # 93

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk 2

[dirtymartini]

Ok, I'll play with myself....I mean by myself.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk 2

[wb57]

I like it. Different bikes for different tags. How many bikes do you have???

[dirtymartini]

Originally Posted by wb57

I like it. Different bikes for different tags. How many bikes do you have???

Enough for three more tags...but one of them broke down today

[wb57]

You're still at 80%.

[WeazyBuddha]

Originally Posted by California

Here's what we need, another tag game!

But this is different. When you make the grab, you don't have to post the next tag, everyone knows that 37 follows 36, etc. etc. etc.

Here's the rules.

Get and post a picture of your bike with whatever number is next in sequence. No posting multiples, if you post "2", you can't post again until "3" is posted by someone else.EDIT! Sequential consecutive numbers are allowed if they are in the same location, same photograph, as in post #24That's all the rules, let's go! This is truly a global tag game, everybody everywhere has numbers. Think of the possibilities, license plates, model numbers, gas price signs, street addresses, speed limit signs, advertisements, there is almost no limit!

If someone just posted number "139", you'd need to post something like this.....

You can see the number "140" on the utility box top left.

I somebody else posted "458", you could post something like this to grab for number "459"
***Snip***

Is 93 still available?

[wb57]

Originally Posted by WeazyBuddha

Is 93 still available?

Nope.

http://www.advrider.com/forums/showp...&postcount=152

Find a 94.

[WeazyBuddha]

What we have here is a failure to communicate.

As per the quote of the rules I highlighted, it seems that a person cannot post consecutive tags so 93 may be invalid; both 92 and 93 were posted by dirtymartini.

[wb57]

Gotcha.
Need a ruling, I guess.
From where I sit, if it sits for some time period, like 4 days or whatever, the previous tagger should be able to snag another one.

Just my opinion from the cheap seats.

[02TAC]

Traditionally, it sits for as long as it sits.

[wb57]

Oh, I know. Just makes more sense for something like the US TOR to sit for a while due to all the reasons it's likely to do so. But for this, and the other wildcard games, personally, I just like to see them move quickly at the expense of being hardcore steadfast in the rules. I'm typically lenient as sh*t when it comes to being exactly on the money with one I've placed in the name of getting folks out riding rather than researching where they might find a #94 or whatever.

I've got a parking lot full of numbered spaces up to about 500 or so within a few miles. I could run it up to that point pretty quickly if I wasn't interested in seeing it move under its own power.

Again: cheap seat philosophy.

[dirtymartini]

I figured I was bending the rules by doing that, but I was out for a good ride on the Norton Mark III and ended up a couple of miles from Pa route #93...I figured I would move it along.

If it doesn't fly no problem, I had a nice 100 mile ride on the Norton. That's what it's all about right?

[California]

IT HAS FLOWN!!!!


We are looking for a "94"

[WeazyBuddha]

I like the rule change, posting consecutive tags will speed things up.

When I posted the last tag I actually had another but realized the rules did not allow me to post it.

[California]

We didn't actually change the rules, but why not? You still have to ride from one to the next, to the next, etc, etc.

So let's go for it, plus, if you do come across a really cool series of number opportunities, it seems it would be a wast NOT to bag it.

So, as the O.P., I hereby and forthwith do solemnly proclaim that multiple, sequential posts by a single poster are hereinafter deemed totally, like, cool!