![]() |
05-17-2012, 09:40 AM
|
#31 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Extreme Pacific SouthWest (of Canada)
Oddometer: 216
|
I can appreciate not wanting to limit articulation on a truck that gets used for serious off-roading. My truck is a 2wd Mazda b2300. Long before I achieved maximum articulation, my truck would be stuck or spinning wheels (open diff.
)!With the camper on, The only time it would achieve maximum articulation is about one second before it rolled over on its side!
|
|
|
05-17-2012, 11:54 AM
|
#32 |
|
Leghumper Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Weatherford, TX
Oddometer: 4,942
|
I like this a lot.
__________________
Brad Felmey-izing threads everywhere |
|
|
05-17-2012, 12:34 PM
|
#33 |
|
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Extreme Pacific SouthWest (of Canada)
Oddometer: 216
|
Stretch67, That's what my rig will be like when it grows up
|
|
|
05-18-2012, 09:19 AM
|
#34 | |
|
Painting by numbers
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Glendo, WY- Pop. 230
Oddometer: 5,387
|
Quote:
or ? I don't know...
__________________
-Chris '04 GS Adv- A fond memory '07 990 Adventure- still bonding... How hard can it be? - Jeremy Clarkson |
|
|
|
05-18-2012, 09:28 AM
|
#35 |
|
Painting by numbers
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Glendo, WY- Pop. 230
Oddometer: 5,387
|
http://carlisuspension.blogspot.com/...xpedition.html
Apparently, they work pretty well on a Power Wagon, but at $850 I'd have to be real sure I needed them. Retired and traveling the world in a POWER WAGON?! Two things come to mind:1. This guy must have one heluva retirement nest egg. 2. No wonder gas prices are so high.
__________________
-Chris '04 GS Adv- A fond memory '07 990 Adventure- still bonding... How hard can it be? - Jeremy Clarkson |
|
|
06-20-2012, 07:16 AM
|
#36 |
|
koolaidless
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: the dry side of Oregon
Oddometer: 1,903
|
I LOVE my truck camper.
![]()
__________________
Been there, broke that SFS |
|
|
07-01-2012, 12:28 PM
|
#37 |
|
Heavy Metal
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Southampton UK
Oddometer: 732
|
I quite fancy a Conqueror.
__________________
Sent from my binary data processing apparatus using magic and wires OLD SKOOL HEAVY METAL |
|
|
07-06-2012, 07:08 AM
|
#38 |
|
koolaidless
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: the dry side of Oregon
Oddometer: 1,903
|
Here is a picture of my AF on the ford with the boat hooked up.....
__________________
Been there, broke that SFS |
|
|
07-07-2012, 04:55 PM
|
#39 |
|
Supercàzzola
Joined: May 2008
Location: Mediocristan
Oddometer: 1,798
|
what kind of weight are we talking about here? I have Super Duty F350 DRW but I've heard that even the ton trucks are overloaded with the largest slide-ins.
__________________
|
|
|
07-07-2012, 07:13 PM
|
#40 | |
|
koolaidless
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: the dry side of Oregon
Oddometer: 1,903
|
Quote:
the picture of the camper on the dodge......dodge is a 3/4 with air bags. Hauls the same load pretty well, but not as good as the ford. I have been hauling truck campers for many years. My best truck for it was a crew cab f350, 2wd dually..........that truck really handled well........if your truck is a dually......i assume that is what "DRW" meant...........you should be able to haul a pretty good sized camper.
__________________
Been there, broke that SFS |
|
|
|
07-07-2012, 07:35 PM
|
#41 |
|
Supercàzzola
Joined: May 2008
Location: Mediocristan
Oddometer: 1,798
|
yes, it's a dually. Thanks for the info. What does the AF do to your mileage? I assume your 350 has the 7.3 as does mine. I wish it had a Cummins instead though
__________________
|
|
|
07-08-2012, 05:42 AM
|
#42 | |
|
koolaidless
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: the dry side of Oregon
Oddometer: 1,903
|
Quote:
Hauling the AF and boat on the ford.............10 to 11...................... In the dodge, I get about 10 pulling the toyhauler and 13 to 14, with the AF and boat............. the ford has an auto and 7.3 with chip, down pipe and gauges............ the dodge has 5 spd, cummins and is bone stock............
__________________
Been there, broke that SFS |
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 07:48 AM
|
#43 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: May 2012
Oddometer: 519
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 09:41 AM
|
#44 |
|
Beastly Adventurer
Joined: May 2005
Location: Kansas City area
Oddometer: 4,019
|
I get the cool factor of the truck camper. I've always had an itch for one. Seems though, like their niche is for getting off the beaten path with as much luxury as possible.
If you goal is to park it while you work in places, seems like a light / short travel trailer would give more available space, more cheaply. Something in a 4k lb 21ft bumper pull travel trailer is going to be easy to find, and inexpensive used. Much easier to unhitch and drop off too.
__________________
2002 KLR650 - 2007 HD Electra Glide 'It doesn't matter how big a ranch ya' own, or how many cows ya' brand,the size of your funeral is still gonna depend on the weather.' Harry Truman "Death smiles upon us all, a U.S. Marine smiles back" |
|
|
07-09-2012, 05:11 PM
|
#45 | |
|
Studly Adventurer
Joined: May 2012
Oddometer: 519
|
Quote:
"What am I going to use it for and where am I going to take it?" Every option is a niche with ups and downs. If I was never going off pavement and was going to be in one spot for a while, some sort of trailer would be the go. Once you start getting off the beaten track, trailers are a bad idea. I know there are lots of people that will say otherwise, but I have seen and experienced to many failures for me to go that way. Campers on the back of utes (pick ups for you 'mericans) seem to have evolved a bit. They are easier to get on and off the vehicle meaning you don't have to take your house with you for a quick trip to the shops or sight seeing, etc. I can certainly see the appeal. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Share |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|