Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Thumpers
User Name
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-18-2012, 03:55 AM   #46
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Oddometer: 396
This really comes down to personal preference & riding style. I had and sold a WRR. Just like any other dual sport bike, it was a mix of compromises. For some people, that mix will work, and for others it won't.

I found the WRR to be down on power for agressive off roading. That's not to say it didn't do well for what it was, but the laque of tourque was tiresome, and I didn't like the bike's inability to get the front end up at speed (like, say, when approaching a log crossing and you don't want to slow down). Don't get me wrong, I could go anywhere I wanted on the bike, but I could never come to grips with the lack of power. That being said, a big 650 like the KLR would have been far worse.

Contrary to what others seem to thnk, I did not like the WRR on the highway at all. It was a fantastic back roads bike, and was a joy as long as the speeds were >65ish, but maintaining anything above that was a battle if you were going up any kind of grade. Yes, it would run 75, but you had to keep it pinned and shift to keep it there. I did several 100+ mile pavement stints on the bike, and it just wore me out. I would have much prefered a KLR/ DR/ Dakar 650 for that kind of thing.

I ended up with a KTM 525 for my "daul sport" use, and will eventuall compliment it with something along the lines of a KLR. For me, the KTM works far better. There is no comparison off road, and it handles limited pavement duty about as well (with alot more power on top). It fits my style and needs. BUT, if I rode less aggressively, or was looking for more of an "exploring"/ plodding around/ forest service road type bike, I would have kept the WRR.

In the end, you almost have to have two bikes. I agree with a previous poster who reccomended keeping the KLR and complimenting it with a low priced, taggable dirt bike.
Rufjeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 04:23 AM   #47
Red Sox Nation
Pantah's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: India Wharf
Oddometer: 10,305
I went from a KTM 950 to a Yamaha WR250R. It took awhile to get used to the lack of power, but I ended up using the WR just like the 950. Mine is lowered with a link, I have a small fly screen plus soft luggage. I like the stock seat with a sheepskin on it. 12 hour days no problem. Performance wise, the Yam 250 will run with my buddy's new KLR on the highway easy. Both cruise best at 65mph or so.

I liked the WR so much I sold the 950 and replaced it with a KTM 690, which is similar to the WR, but a lot more power. It cruises at 80 or so.
Straight ahead and faster -Bo Weaver 1970
"There I was..." -Griffin Niner Three Hotel
"One day closer to a parade..." Jonny Gomes, spring training 2013
Pantah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 06:39 AM   #48
Nobody's Robot
cjbiker's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Southern Maine
Oddometer: 2,906
Originally Posted by TNC View Post
Even with just an OEM KLX300 cylinder on the 250S, it climbs like a freakin' cat...
Even 100% stock, the KLX is a little tractor. Nice low end torque and super smooth power delivery. One of the motorcycle mags did a 250cc dual sport shootout a couple of years ago. The WRR won every category, with the KLX close behind. However, many of the testers preferred the KLX due to its more friendly power band.
cjbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 07:15 AM   #49
Candyass Camper
TNC's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Tejas
Oddometer: 4,629
Originally Posted by cjbiker View Post
Even 100% stock, the KLX is a little tractor. Nice low end torque and super smooth power delivery. One of the motorcycle mags did a 250cc dual sport shootout a couple of years ago. The WRR won every category, with the KLX close behind. However, many of the testers preferred the KLX due to its more friendly power band.
Right out-of-the-box, the WRR is faster and has a little more available power due mainly to the FI. The carb on the KLX requires it to be super lean, and Kawasaki equipped it with a really choked down muffler. The price difference between the 2 bikes, however, makes it very easy and logical to mod the exhaust and install a Dynojet kit. This changes the KLX dramatically. Otherwise the 2 bikes are very similar in weight and suspension performance. I wouldn't mind having either bike, but I was able to find a used '06 model KLX for a decent price so it was a moot point.
TNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 07:41 AM   #50
Lame Duck Adventurer
byron555's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Central Wisconsin
Oddometer: 1,129
xr650L to WR250r, no regrets.

I like my wr much more.... but I do miss the torque at times. KLX or WRr, or the new crf250l I think any of these would be a good choice
Another inmate stole my Avatar...
WR250R... 15 cubic inches of raw power.
WRr re-build
byron555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2012, 08:24 AM   #51
pass the catnip
twinrider's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: 日本
Oddometer: 9,491
I have a Dakar and a Djebel 250XC. The Djebel is much easier to ride offroad, lets me try things I wouldn't risk doing on the Dakar. But the Dakar hammers it in the comfort stakes for LD riding and is much more fun on twisty back roads. In short, horses for courses...
2014 350 EXC-F
2011 XT1200Z
2009 FLHR
2006 Djebel 250XC
twinrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2012, 10:09 PM   #52
ntm1973 OP
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: PA
Oddometer: 106
I know this is an older thread but thanks for all the responses guys. I ended up trading my KLR for a dr650 a few months ago and think that I found a nice balance. I still wouldn't mind finding something smaller (dr350 or xt225) but compared to the klr, the dr "feels" much lighter and easier to work in the woods, plus I didn't give up anything on the road. Just to be clear, I don't ride a lot of single track and I'm not in a hurry to get anywhere offroad so that may be a factor for other riders. The dr is still a heavy beast to unstuck from a mud whole alone in the woods but it feels worlds better than the klr which probably has a lot to do with me being short.

Anyway, just thought I'd give an update in case anyone else is looking to downsize; don't overlook the dr650 if you still have to ride the superslab. It still seems like an xt225 or dr200 would be a good wife bike that I could "borrow" from time to time.
ntm1973 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 06:03 AM   #53
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Southern New Jersey
Oddometer: 6,826
I had a dr650 with a pumper carb and upgraded suspension, and loved it.
It was loads of fun right up to the point of the helicopter ride.
It was not a bad fall, but the weight and height of the bike was too much for my old bones.

Something to keep in mind when playing in the dirt, the more weight you have, and the higher the bike is, makes for a worse crash.
After the dr, I got a tw200, at least 50 pounds lighter, lower, and big fat tires, great for the sand, and I went places I never would have gone with a dr650. And it was easy.

I hear very good things about the wr250, but I think a klx with a pumper carb and maybe a big bore kit would be the way I would go.
If you are going to do things to a bike, a carb is a good way to go, and a well set up pumper works as well as FI if you are at a stable altitude.

Lean set vacuum carbs just suck, and really dull the performance of any bike that has one.

I find it fun to push a bike to my and its limits in the dirt or on the street, and find a smaller bike fun on the street, where you can pin the throttle, work the gears, tuck in and simulate a road race, without getting tickets.

The dr650 was great fun, but with the ability to get over 100 mph very quickly, the throttle wheelies, tickets were just a matter of time...
I did not do a lot of street on the dr, I hate the tire wear, wanting good sharp knobs for the dirt/sand/mud, but it was fun on the street.

In the dirt, I want light weight above everything else.
2nd comes reliability because I ride alone and hate pushing a bike in sand.
3rd comes power and throttle response.
4th comes suspension.

A friend has a couple of xt225's and they were a lot of fun in the rough stuff, very easy to ride over some very nasty stuff.

The dirt is very close to my house, so my need to do the street was nil, and a dr350 or some 250 would have been a lot better then a dr650, but other people need to travel to get someplace good to ride, and there a 650 is likely a nicer choice, if their bones are strong....
Anyone who rides a 650 in the dirt needs very good medical insurance...
NJ-Brett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:27 AM   #54
Beastly Adventurer
oldxr's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: central komifornia
Oddometer: 1,151
I ride a plated honda xr650r.Kind of a wierd cross breed between a baja racer and adventure bike.I have found that at dual sport events that I haul the bike to I word prefer a newer high tech bike like a ktm exc-losing 50 lbs of bike would make the day more fun.But sometimes I ride the xrr 60 miles of highway+60 miles of dirt forest service road+60 miles highway back home.I would miss the 650 on the highway-it has lots of passing power on the highway.A buddy got a beater dr350 and I like it.Low tech air cooled + a good 6 speed trans.

oldxr screwed with this post 08-16-2012 at 09:28 AM Reason: spelling
oldxr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:43 AM   #55
Gnarly Adventurer
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Oddometer: 396
Originally Posted by MookieBlaylock View Post
i have a te 250 and it is briiliant at everything singletrack except the climbs and rock gardens. Since it has low power it uses a 120 section rear tire so it has that much less grip , and if you can imagine 7000 rpms over rocks you get the idea
This made me laugh because it is pretty accurate....and I had a WRR and sold it. Mostly because all we have are hills and gnarly rockgardens.
Rufjeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:54 AM   #56
Beastly Adventurer
jon_l's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Collingwood, Ontario
Oddometer: 3,459
I moved form DR650SE to a WR250R this June; happy so far. I miss the DR's power a little, but the WRR is better than I expected in that dept, and the weight is wonderful (by comparison).

I rode a KLX250SF around Vancouver Island for 4 days, and it was a hoot, though I didn't like the sport-bike tires in deep gravel, nor was it ideal the high-speed highway, but we avoided both whenever we could. Fun bike.

With FI and 100cc more, the KLX250S (KLX350S) would rule the small-displacement Japanese dual-sport market. This would be so easy, since FI is already in world markets, and there are already 300 to 351 top ends proven for this engine.

When I decided to down-size, I determined that I would buy either a KLX351S or WR250R, whichever turned-up 1st in the condition I wanted (very clean). WR250R was 1st, and having done the factory lowering, and well into the farkling, I am pleased.
CBF1000 & PCX150, PCX Fuelly

jon_l screwed with this post 08-16-2012 at 10:05 AM
jon_l is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:56 AM   #57
Eflyguy's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, USA
Oddometer: 22
Here's my perspective: I'm new to DS (DR650) but have liter street bikes (two FZ1s) and a 250cc trail bike (WR250F) - I would not consider using my DR for serious trail/dirt use with friends but would use it, say, if the whole family went on an easy trail ride. On the other hand, my WR feels faster than the DR but obviously could not run 70 on the highway for an hour. I'd love to ride the 250 around town but it's not street legal.

So, it really depends on how far and fast you need to go on the street, and the capability of the specific 250 you're considering. The WR250R, for example, can run at highway speeds no problem. Ultimately, I think I'd be as happy on that, but I couldn't justify the cost..
Eflyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 05:44 AM   #58
Gnarly Adventurer
esp41's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2011
Oddometer: 121
My weapon of choice for "subjectively superior" mediocre off/on road performance was an old 2006 TE610. Lightweight (310#ish), many farkles available to tailor the bike. Plenty of torque (576 cc). Will do log road/fire trails all day long and can cruise at 70 as well. It has a carb(repairable in the field). Durable motor. The downside is the inability to find parts in a hurry.

Dualsport should be listed in the dictionary under compromise, cuz there is no clear weapon of choice.

2006 Husqvarna TE610- TAT 2013 survivor!
TAT Ride Report Here
2008 KTM 300 XCW-e
1993 Harley Heritage Classic
Tomos ST
esp41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 09:04 PM   #59
Rift- Raft, SCooter Trash
cbig's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Oddometer: 977
this question keeps this site going ;-)

One of the best compromise I found was a 2007 te610. Proverbial drz with a 6th gear. Did a few hauls on interstate 15 and dirt was passable w some suspension mods. Other and best compromise is a xr600. Bout 294 lbs fueled with plenty of spank and reliability. Kick start no biggie nice seat a.d lots of torque. 60-65 mph comfy.

I'm not a subscriber of the 650 ride to camp, unload gear and explore school. For 1, the tires useful in dirt wear out too fast on road. 2. I'm too f*ckin old to camp in the dirt with an uncomfortable mummy bag and a few granola bars. Rather camp well out of a van as others suggest or my rv and ride out from there.

Basic issue is:
What are you? Dirt bike rider or "adventure rider?" If you are a dirt bike rider you have the skills or are working on them to get you thru the unknown unknowns. Best way to do that is on a light bike first. Dirt bike riders tend to be more mechanically in tune with their bikes and capable of more than routine maintenance, keep stuff longer before bored and generally prefer as little pavement as possible. I feel my xr250r is less safe on street so I ride most powerful light bike I can. Xr600.
cbig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 12:07 AM   #60
Studly Adventurer
Joined: Jul 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Oddometer: 976
Argh. The back and forth of these threads just has my brain hurting. I did not know about the KLX or the WR when I bought my DR650. I am not a harescrambler but a slow trail explorer who wants to go places. Problem is, I have no experience, and im going to Alaska next May. I have read so many of these threads it makes my head spin.

Around here, the offroad is nothing like some of the places I will be going. I WILL be woefully unprepared. Im young and strong and all that, but I kind of wish I had gotten a KLX351 or WR- Id prolly be less apt to break something going with a lighter bike.

Im considering swapping out my DR for something lighter even though the DR will probably be infinitely more fun when im back from the trip. Thing is, I will have to carry lots of crap with me (about 60lbs), and considering im riding at a slow pace, I wonder if a big thumper isnt better for me anyways. My biggest mistake was assuming the 250s wouldnt be enough on the roads..
GSF1200S is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Times are GMT -7.   It's 06:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2015