ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Beasts
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-25-2013, 08:19 PM   #1
Boredsurfer OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Oddometer: 363
ADV BIKES MAGAZINE COMPAROS - enough already!!

Is it just me, or is anyone else tired of all the mags/website guys doing ADV Bike comparos with either one of the following always happening:

1) They include a bike (or two) with a 17" front wheel
2) They always miss one (or two) bikes from the class

Seems like it is deliberate almost.

Look I get it, the manufacturers only have so many press bikes to go around, and AD dollars can be at risk if you run some bikes in the dirt BUT some mag must know we want THEM ALL ranked and compared at once on the same DAY and course/route - OFF Road and ON. All bikes, same day, same course, 19" front prerequisite.

Anyhooo, rant off.
Boredsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 08:25 PM   #2
pluric
Gimpy Adventurer
 
pluric's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake
Oddometer: 15,538
I hate it when my bike loses for lack of a factory cruise control.



Oh wait, I forgot. I stopped giving a shit a while ago. Nevermind.
pluric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 08:35 PM   #3
Lion BR
I'd rather be riding
 
Lion BR's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon
Oddometer: 3,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boredsurfer View Post
Is it just me, or is anyone else tired of all the mags/website guys doing ADV Bike comparos with either one of the following always happening:

1) They include a bike (or two) with a 17" front wheel
2) They always miss one (or two) bikes from the class

Seems like it is deliberate almost.

Look I get it, the manufacturers only have so many press bikes to go around, and AD dollars can be at risk if you run some bikes in the dirt BUT some mag must know we want THEM ALL ranked and compared at once on the same DAY and course/route - OFF Road and ON. All bikes, same day, same course, 19" front prerequisite.

Anyhooo, rant off.
If you want to be really bad ass, you should say only bikes with 21 inch wheels are considered "adventure". If you allow 19 inchers, 17's should also be accepted.

A German magazine compared the two KTM Adventure models, the 1190 and the 1190R. The 1190R has the 21 inch wheel. Their conclusion. Unless you really will take the bike out on real off road rides, by the 1190 (with the 19 inch). They say: people who buy the R usually buy the wrong bike.

KTM classifies these bikes as "travel" bikes, both of them. Not as enduro. Or adventure.

The comparison with a 17 inch bike with a 19 is relevant for people who are in the more road oriented side of this equation. It is relevant for them. Maybe not for the bad ass that wants the 21 in bike. It is all part of the rainbow.

Anyway, why bother? You probably already know the bike you want.
__________________
Whenever we are riding, we are an ambassador to our sport

I'd rather be riding!


Lion BR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 08:45 PM   #4
Drunk_Uncle
Beastly Adventurer
 
Drunk_Uncle's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Anchorage, AK
Oddometer: 1,920
For the rider that seldom ventures off the pavement, but wants a really comfortable good handling bike, the 17" front is not a bad choice. And now with the availability of a 17" TKC, it makes more sense. Yes I am bit biased having owned a Uly for 2 years.

I think the popularity of these bikes is people now realize they handle nearly as good as a sport touring bike and they are super comfy on the long haul. It doesn't hurt that they look cool. So I welcome the Ducati and Aprilia and others.
__________________
"I refuse to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death"
'13 Tiger 800XC, '13 KLR 650, and a 2010 Honda NT700V for the wife.
Drunk_Uncle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:06 PM   #5
vivo
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Oddometer: 93
We have all read enough to know how these bikes work. It would be cool to see a BIG shoot off but why bother? In terms of actual user preferences, to some extent, it really doesn't matter. I bought a Stelvio even though I know the Triumph has a very good engine, the BMW has lots more farkles, the Tenere is better off road by some degree... but none of that matters. I wanted a Guzzi, a twin and this bike felt better between my legs than some others. For my intentions the bike I wanted was the Stelvio, not the MultiStrada. I don't need a magazine to tell me how good the Ducati engine is and how its so easy to ride fast. I'm not interested in those traits. I'm not interested in hearing the GS or Tenere is best off road until you introduce the KTM and then it stomps them. It doesn't matter to me because these BIG bikes are not the BEST bikes for off road adventures of a serious nature and I'm not planning an epic journey.

I have to admit it's nice to be rewarded with glowing reports on a bike we ride. It sucks having to justify being on a slug in the eyes of the journalists but sometimes with these bikes it's a bit of splitting hairs, they all are good machines it just depends of what flavor you prefer. Butt t... the Magazines said the Stelvio was better than they thought it would be... hmmm what a nice back handed complement... doesn't matter. I like the Stelvio for what qualities it possesses. If I wanted more of an upright sportbike I would take the Multi, or new Capo. It depends on what is important to YOU, not someone else which is why I am confused by threads asking "Which Bike Should I Get?"
If YOU don't know, how in the world is it someone else can define YOUR needs and desires?

Vivo
vivo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:16 PM   #6
pluric
Gimpy Adventurer
 
pluric's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake
Oddometer: 15,538
^^^ To bad that's to long to make a sig line. Well said
pluric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 11:05 PM   #7
Pecha72
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Oddometer: 2,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivo View Post
I have to admit it's nice to be rewarded with glowing reports on a bike we ride. It sucks having to justify being on a slug in the eyes of the journalists

Why not quit caring so much, what they think?

For one thing, the journos often do NOT get to use new machines for more than a few hours, especially if itīs a launch event. Cannot possibly tell everything about the bike (from an everyday user point of view) based on that very short test. And secondly, if itīs a comparo, it is their īmissionī to rank the bikes from 1st to last, but there will still always be a certain amount of their own preferences and biases involved in this. Itīs not absolute science, especially on bikes like this, that are not ranked by how fast they can lap around a circuit. For example, the engines are so different in this category: v-twin, parallel twin, triple, inline-four, v-four.... somebody prefers a v-twin, while another person just simply likes an inline-four more. They wonīt be able to tell you, which one YOU will like best.

And also remember, they always ride these things to be able to come up with a story. So theyīll often īspice upī things by exaggerating a bit (..and sometimes more than just a bit!)
Pecha72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 11:24 PM   #8
GrahamD
Beastly Adventurer
 
GrahamD's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Blue Mnts Ozstralia
Oddometer: 4,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivo View Post
We have all read enough to know how these bikes work.
Vivo
Well said Vivo.

All I want from a review is some indication of where the bike works well and where it may fall a bit short and as far as ADV style bikes go it means actually taking them off road using competent testers.

I can make up my mind from there.

And bear in mind that the latest WOW wizz bang wonder is probably 2.5% better than last years. There is a motivation to sell new stuff for the advertisers.
__________________
"It's better to ride a boring bike than push an interesting one" ... Canuman

"I just may as well admit that my other bikes are toast. I don't ride them. Plain and simple. I didn't want this. It wasn't the plan." - snakebitten
GrahamD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 03:32 AM   #9
jjdavidson
Adventurer
 
jjdavidson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Location: Kainuu, Finland
Oddometer: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drunk_Uncle View Post
For the rider that seldom ventures off the pavement, but wants a really comfortable good handling bike, the 17" front is not a bad choice. And now with the availability of a 17" TKC, it makes more sense. Yes I am bit biased having owned a Uly for 2 years.

I think the popularity of these bikes is people now realize they handle nearly as good as a sport touring bike and they are super comfy on the long haul. It doesn't hurt that they look cool. So I welcome the Ducati and Aprilia and others.
And you can pretty easily fit 19" front to Uly, too...
jjdavidson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 02:26 PM   #10
Ham
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Oddometer: 258
This is an interesting topic. I like to think about convertible car comparos where they spend a page on how hard or easy it is to put the roof up and rank them from taking 15 seconds to maybe 31 seconds....after you own that car and put the roof up a dozen times you got it down flat and any of them do it well. What I want to know is does it leak:)

So. I think these kind of comparos would be more helpful if they highlighted better the character differences of the bikes. Now I know some of you are hot shit, but the fact is very few of us can or will ride any of these bikes at 10/10ths...just too dang fast and way over our heads.

I differ about the off road usage, as I think a lot of us do the fire road thing and that really matters.

A lot is made of 21 inch wheels, which I have on my Dakar...its awful in the sand and its awful on the highway.
19 inch is a real nice split and my Stelvio out handles it in everything...go figure.

So what do I like about my Stelvio, well one thing is the engine thrumb...I specifically love it. The Triumph on the other hand is a marvelous engine...and sounds and runs like a sewing machine. Some folks love all that smooth...not me. The BMW is just boring as an engine. The Yamaha is rough in the first few months...I don't want rough. So there you go, just one trait...who wins...no one as what we are picking out is what we like.

So I think all these comparos tell us is just what those riders like. Gees just look at us...no two alike....so how can any bike do it all?
Ham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 04:43 PM   #11
RaY YreKa
I Am the Mayor
 
RaY YreKa's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: YreKa BaKery
Oddometer: 15,951
MCN (UK) has split their tests now.

There are many more ADV bikes these days, since they seem to have filled the sport-touring niche in a lot of markets.
__________________
IBA #40578

shine on, you crazy emo diamond
RaY YreKa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 04:24 PM   #12
BobbyLee666
Gnarly Adventurer
 
BobbyLee666's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Oddometer: 275
I personally like reading reviews about all kinds of bikes. The magazines and reviewers have their jobs to do, and some are better than others, but no one makes you read their stuff. Don't, if it bothers you so much.
__________________
The destination is not important, only the ride there...
Current bike: 2003 KLR650; Previous bikes: Several.
BobbyLee666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 04:46 PM   #13
whisperquiet
Studly Adventurer
 
whisperquiet's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: 62298 in lovely corrupt/bankrupt Southern Illinois
Oddometer: 821
So, buy the bike YOU like and ride it--------------the end. I like my Super Tenere and my KLR650.
whisperquiet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2013, 01:13 PM   #14
mrbreeze
Beastly Adventurer
 
mrbreeze's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: God's Country
Oddometer: 7,021
a bunch of years ago when I was shopping for sport tourer, the Honda ST1100 was the favorite of all the magazines. I rode one and liked it, but thought before I bought it I would give the Concours a try. I bought the Connie and never regretted it. Buy what works for you.
__________________
2006 Honda VTX1300R

Walk with the wise and become wise,
for a companion of fools suffers harm. Proverbs 13:20
mrbreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2013, 09:22 AM   #15
dceggert
Gnarly Adventurer
 
dceggert's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Metro Detroit - almost like offroad riding
Oddometer: 213
I got wrapped up in the latest go around of WC R1200GS vs. Tiger Explorer and started to scratch my head when one set of reviews would say one thing and another set would say something else. I came to the realization that I am listening to these reviewers opinions.

Now it may be that is exactly why we read these things. We are hoping to hear from someone that has actually ridden the things and has the experience to form an opinion. Unfortunately, like everything else in life, these bikes all exist in some big gray bubble where there are no real clear winners. Yet these writers try to make the comparison black and white or even some huge drama over which is better.

Case in point - in one print magazine the new Tiger Explorer is rated as 'not off road capable.' Why? You cannot stand on it, the bars are in the wrong place, the suspension is set up wrong, the seat is too wide, the tank intrudes on your space, it has too much power...etc. The writer made it sound like it was only good as a Goldwing competitor. Then I saw a review on Youtube, same shoot out. The reviewer this time said it was comfy to stand on, it was more maneuverable, and it performed offroad flawlessly compared to the GS. What gives? Well on the second review the suspension is not ESA on the Tiger but you need to adjust it for offroad; apparently the first reviewer missed that. Also pointed out is that the bike is overpowered unless you leave traction control on (the first reviewer turned it off because he "hates" the electronics).

Personal preference and opinion is all it has come down to. Am I paying for these excessively wide dramatized comparisons based on the reviewers stupidity and laziness? It reminds me of why I dropped Road&Track a few years ago and started reading Autoweek. There is something good about everything.

Why is it so important then? Right here in these forums I read over and over again how the Tiger Explorer is no good for the dirt. You cannot stand up on it, it is too top heavy, it is 12 lbs more than a GS...etc, etc, etc... Parroting the same high drama conclusions of these same reviewers in the mags. Good grief!

It reminds me of one comment made a few years ago regarding Lincoln Navigators....why do they have AWD with a setting called 'dirt' in the first place? The mags all drive them around in fields, down dirt roads, pulling boats up gravel ramps, etc. and *rate* them based on the performance against a Jeep. The comment came in the form of the above question: "Why have AWD on these at all? The only time the customer will see time offroad is when they miss the driveway!"

In the scramble to have the latest wild drama review with a black and white conclusion (with as much stupid wit thrown in to boot) these writers cannot see the story because they are all wrapped up in the words!
__________________
regards,
Dan
2006 BMW K1200GT (the Jagdpanther has arrived as of 5-Aug-2011)
2005 R1200GS (sold)
1999 HD Ultra Classic
dceggert is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014