ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Thumpers
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-15-2012, 08:08 PM   #1
DirtWarrior OP
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: San Jose, Ca.
Oddometer: 77
350exc or 450 exc

Hey guys,
I'm throwing around the idea of picking up a smaller thumper for OHV parks and some single-track riding and occasional trips to the desert. I currently use my 690 for bigger rides and riding mostly fire roads with it. I was looking at the 2013 models and I noticed there is only a weight difference of 8 lbs between the 350 exc and 450exc bikes. Guy's at work are telling me to buy the 450, but none of them have ridden a 350, so I want to hear your opinions. I'm not a big guy at all, weighing 145 and the bike will not be used on roads (other than to cross trails).

Nick
__________________
2014 KTM 500 EXC
2009 KTM 690 Adventure
2008 KTM 250 XCF-W ---Sold
DirtWarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2012, 08:15 PM   #2
spencergt66
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Oddometer: 639
Bigger

If your doing mostly fire roads and open desert I would go for more CC might even consider the 500 with the FI now the bikes rev quick and are pretty peppy but I would think if you got the 350 you would be looking for more on the open stuff. Tighter single or dubble track the 350 would shine but wide open your going to want goobs of Tq
spencergt66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2012, 08:26 PM   #3
Cyberg
Adventurer
 
Cyberg's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Oddometer: 37
I would go with the 450 for the fact that they last longer than the 350 between rebuilds. Plus at 145 lbs you wont have enough ass to make the tire on the 500 stop spinning. Also the 450 will have better resale over the 350.

Im a big guy and the 500 has more than enough hp.
Cyberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2012, 08:32 PM   #4
Foot dragger
singletracker
 
Foot dragger's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: chico,just below rag dump(nor-cal)
Oddometer: 12,288
You would really have to ride each,the 350 involves higher rpm whether its on a trail or dirt road,a 450 that has been made to run mild so as to be street legal from the factory should be pretty smooth. Maybe your only looking at the dirt only models. When resale time comes,the dual-purpose bikes are WAY easier to sell,and they dont weigh much more then the dirt only bikes. As far as I know KTM doesnt make a street legal 450 so thats it for that idea.

Really.........for strictly dirt I like my 300 lots better then any 4 stroke,personal issue.
__________________
Some bikes around at times
Foot dragger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2012, 09:39 PM   #5
Off the grid
Chaotic Good
 
Off the grid's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: That buzzing in your earhole, NorCal.
Oddometer: 9,501
300 2-stroke
__________________
Wedding(s) = $30,000
Divorce(s) = $25,000
2007 Triumph Tiger 1050 ABS = Priceless
Help my buddy mike fight kidney Cancer. Anything helps!
Off the grid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 04:04 AM   #6
chippertheripper
motorcycle junkie
 
chippertheripper's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: s.e. mass
Oddometer: 1,950
I also vote 300, but if that really isn't an option, 350.
In the woods it's alot harder to make up for any bikes shortcomings than out in the open.
And it's not really the 8lbs that makes the difference, it's how that weight is carried...up top and in rotating mass makes for a more sluggish handler.
__________________
Cliff's Cycles KTM Woodcraft-CFM
LRRS 560ex (retired), PSTR b-vet 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Night Falcon View Post
Life is too short to crash on a bike you don't respect
chippertheripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 06:31 AM   #7
Cyberg
Adventurer
 
Cyberg's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Oddometer: 37
Remember he lives in Ca. Alot of our trails are not as tight as back east style woods riding.

Also I think the 350 is a high maint engine design. He also stated a smaller 4t compaired to his 690. Now if he wanted a 2t I would recomend the 300 as one of the best bikes out.
Cyberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 08:14 PM   #8
DirtWarrior OP
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: San Jose, Ca.
Oddometer: 77
I would definitely like a two-stroke, but that is not an option for me simply because of the red/green sticker law in Kalifornia. I'm getting the impression that the 350 excf is a high maintenance engine, but as someone mentioned, I'll have to try both bikes. Is the street-legal 450 not available for 2013 in the U.S?
__________________
2014 KTM 500 EXC
2009 KTM 690 Adventure
2008 KTM 250 XCF-W ---Sold
DirtWarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 02:47 PM   #9
Bofaxrunner
Adventurer
 
Bofaxrunner's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Oddometer: 79
I have a 690 kitted with a rally raid, and a 350 excf. I could not imagine a better combo. My best friend has a 450 exc, and we swap all the time. His bike has more low end, but they seem to be almost identical on the top end. We have the same gearing btw. Once I got my 350 dialed, I wouldn't give it up for anything. I turns much faster and feels much lighter than the 450. I have a 3.5 gallon tank and almost always have more fuel than my buddies stocker and we both agree my bike is more flick able.

It does have a more complicated valve adjustment, but it makes the bike feel so smooth while revving. I can't imagine you would regret it.
__________________
08' KTM 690 Adventure (RallyRaid)
12' KTM 350 EXC-F
1975 Norton Commando 850 (Resto Project)
Bofaxrunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 06:20 PM   #10
4play
Next?
 
4play's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Avondale, AZ
Oddometer: 2,278
I rode a friends 350 & ride with him all over AZ. That thing is like a mountain bike with a nice torquey engine. I don't know that maintainence schedule, but he's never compained & seems to love the little bike.
__________________
I ride to give my mind a vacation, I work so I can ride
4play is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 06:59 PM   #11
motomark39
I reckon so
 
motomark39's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Odenville, Alabama
Oddometer: 1,061
Cool2 all 3

In the last year I have tried all 3, 500exc, 350xcf, and as of right now still have the 450xcw. 350, not torquie, no grunt off the bottom, mid range up motor. 500, great bottom, great torque, very strong. 450, same as the 500, BUT easier to manage, can be more agressive, and less tiring to ride longer than the 500, feels better in the corners. The 350 is a good running bike, but doesn't get the adrenalin flowing with a twist of the wrist.
__________________
2013 HusabergTE300
2000 BMW R1100RT
motomark39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 02:58 AM   #12
jon_l
Beastly Adventurer
 
jon_l's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Collingwood, Ontario
Oddometer: 2,738
Is the 450 is street legal in CA? Doesn't look like it to me on the KTM website. 350 vs 500 seems to be the choice in new bikes.
__________________
'09 Honda CBF1000; '09 Yamaha WR250R
jon_l is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 03:40 AM   #13
Steveman
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Steveman's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Austria
Oddometer: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bofaxrunner View Post
I have a 690 kitted with a rally raid, and a 350 excf. I could not imagine a better combo. My best friend has a 450 exc, and we swap all the time. His bike has more low end, but they seem to be almost identical on the top end. We have the same gearing btw. Once I got my 350 dialed, I wouldn't give it up for anything. I turns much faster and feels much lighter than the 450. I have a 3.5 gallon tank and almost always have more fuel than my buddies stocker and we both agree my bike is more flick able.

It does have a more complicated valve adjustment, but it makes the bike feel so smooth while revving. I can't imagine you would regret it.
absolutely +1, bought the 350 right out of the show room. Had a 450 which is strong and has more low end torque. But the 350 is much easier to ride, handles like a 250 and when grip is bad eats the 450 and 500 with ease.

Many prefer the 500 for "what they call enduro" but real enduro ends in second gear or even earlier. Desert blasting, fire track and greenlaning, I'd take the 500 as it is just superstrong. As soon you get in the real hard stuff forget it. You cant manage the torque. And that is why even big guys in enduro championship go for the 350. Well, have to admit Johnny Aubert although championship winner swaps back to a 500 from the 350. But the exception proves the rule

CU
Steve
Steveman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 03:21 PM   #14
Navaho
Beastly Adventurer
 
Navaho's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Oddometer: 1,015
These guys were not too happy with the handling and suspsension of the new 450.

http://www.motorcycle-usa.com/178/13...-Shootout.aspx

The complaints that they have about the handling is the way I feel about my 2007 450 and very typical of most KTM bikes I've owned or ridden. They are tall and squirrely. Designed for clearing obstacles and turning on a dime (at the expense of stability).

Some comments from the article:

"One of the most telling discoveries is that none of our testers listed the XC-W as their bike of preference, while every other machine got at least one top vote."

“I could never come to grips with the handling of the KTM. The front end pushes like crazy, and the back end wants to slide all over the place. It’s always twitching and moving around. I never felt like I could give it my all on the KTM. I was afraid I’d end up blowing a turn and wind up in a cholla cactus.”

“Stability is questionable in the high-speed, bumpy sections," adds our Pro racer. "Although the suspension soaks it up well and it is well balanced, I think for how fast the bike is geared to go from the factory, the suspension should be stiffer.”

The KTM did however get praised for it's motor and light clutch.
__________________
2007 KTM 450EXC Plated
2006 KTM 950 Supermoto
2009 YZ450F "Woodserized"
Navaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 05:02 PM   #15
wizz
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: over yonder on the north coast of ca
Oddometer: 768
chilly from enduro360.com:


* ASternad, on 02 September 2012 - 10:52 AM, said:
Chilly -
Between the 350 and 500 as per your ride test - if you were going on a ride and had no idea what you would be encountering (tight, sand, open, rocky), which bike would you prefer?

response:
Bike choice, that is a tough one. Personally I enjoy riding the 350 much more. It is a real riders bike, very responsive and great handling. I also like the way it makes power. For better or worse, it has a small bike personality. It surprises me that the power is pretty much on par with my older RFS 450's. I just picked up a '13 350exc that will be a long term test bike, super excited about it.


Personally I'm 200lbs and I got the 350. Was advised by folks that have access to both bikes (along with 9 other bike at anytime) and they said if it involves dirt they grab the 350. I couldnt be happier. As powerfull as my xr650, not quite as tourquey, but plenty of low end none the less and feels likea bicycle. really easy to handle.
in
__________________
"These things are like intellectual viruses loose in the theater of discourse, and you can’t really argue with these people, because they don’t understand the rules of argument," Terence Mckenna
"An honest tune with a lingering lead has taken me this far"WSP
2006DucatiMultistrada620, 2013 KTM 350 exc-f
wizz is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014