ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Road warriors
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-13-2012, 07:36 AM   #1
GotMojo? OP
Beastly Adventurer
 
GotMojo?'s Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Oddometer: 4,107
2013 Kawasaki Ninja 300 vs. 2013 Honda CBR500R





I was really thinking about picking up one of the new 2013 Ninja 300's in the spring, but this new Honda CBR500R has me intrigued. I prefer the styling of the Ninja, but I wonder if I'd appreciate the extra power of the Honda.

Anybody else out there considering the Ninja 300, but now you're looking at the new Honda? I wonder if Kawasaki wishes they would have stuck with the Ninja 250R and then re-designed the Ninja 500 instead of discontinuing it?
GotMojo? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:48 AM   #2
Grainbelt
marginal adventurer
 
Grainbelt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Minnyhappiness
Oddometer: 26,693
Thousand dollar spread in price.

375lbs vs. 425 lbs

39 hp vs. 54 hp


Grainbelt screwed with this post 11-13-2012 at 03:34 PM Reason: sounds like US models get 54hp, not 47
Grainbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:57 AM   #3
Meter Man
Living on a prayer
 
Meter Man's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Montana
Oddometer: 7,229
I would be surprised if we don't see a New Ninja 500 at some point in the next few years.

Honda sold a lot of CB500s over the years in Europe and Kawasaki sold a lot of ER-5/EX500s over the years as well.

Perfect market niche in Europe, and the number of years Kawasaki sold the Ninja 500 in the US indicates to me it is a large market segment here as well.
Meter Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 08:00 AM   #4
ZZ-R Rider
Captain Sensible
 
ZZ-R Rider's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: Far East of the Western World
Oddometer: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grainbelt View Post
Thousand dollar spread in price.

375lbs vs. 425 lbs

39 hp vs. 47? hp

Almost exactly the same power-to-weight ratio ...
__________________
Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounded by arseholes ...
ZZ-R Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 08:11 AM   #5
Grainbelt
marginal adventurer
 
Grainbelt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Minnyhappiness
Oddometer: 26,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZZ-R Rider View Post
Almost exactly the same power-to-weight ratio ...
47 is a guess for the CBR, that is the euro licensing HP point they've quoted for Europe.

Add a 180lb human to each and the story is a little different, but it will depend on how they make their power.
Grainbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 08:14 AM   #6
Grainbelt
marginal adventurer
 
Grainbelt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Minnyhappiness
Oddometer: 26,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meter Man View Post
I would be surprised if we don't see a New Ninja 500 at some point in the next few years.
I dunno how they can fit something between the $5k Ninja 300 and the $7,500 Ninja 650R.

When they needed a 400cc bike for a few province's insurance regs in Canada, they just sleeved down the 650 and left the chassis the same.
Grainbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 08:38 AM   #7
Navin
Unwounding
 
Navin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 6,672
I've added a few HP and lost a few lbs on my 300 and still spent less $ than the Honda, not that it would have changed my mind. 40-50 lbs is alot of weight and I wanted the light Ninja 250 feel with better brakes/suspension. It's getting there.

The 300 makes good power from 4k up. It is more of a midrange motor than anything else, nothing like the 250s. 2 up is easy and I'm bumping the CS up a tooth as 1st is too short IMO. I start in second 75% of the time now.

I had a 06 Ninja 500 as beater just a few years ago and the tossabbility was fun, the junk-o-meter was pegged though. The 300 at least looks better, still crap under the skin, which the Honda will probably be too.

210lbs, 6-01" +35 years racing/riding, just off a KTM 950SMR.
Navin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 09:16 AM   #8
Gryphon12
Beastly Adventurer
 
Gryphon12's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Carnation, WA USA
Oddometer: 1,194
It's not the peak HP rating, or the total weight, but the shape of the HP curve, and most importantly, the shape of the torque curve, that matters to me.

There will be no beating physics. The Honda will produce more torque, and probably produce more torque per pound of motorcycle weight (official specs still pending, and differences will exist perhaps between European and US tuning of the motor). If the CB500's are tuned for gas mileage, then the cams will probably be mild, maximizing (or at least producing a flat) torque curve.

Navin is right, the 50 lbs. weight difference between the EX300R and CB500 is quite a bit in this class, even if power-to-weight ratio is close to the same. It will be interesting to see the first reviews and dyno test results. Early numbers on the Internet can be misleading, but 47 HP and 30 ft-lbs (41 Nm) of torque have been bandied about in conversation as peak numbers for the European-tuned CB500's. This means 9.1 lb/HP and 10.4 lb/Nm @ 428 lbs. wet. Comparable Ninja 300R peak numbers are 39/20(27) and 9.8 lb/HP and 14.0 lb/Nm @ 378 lbs. wet.

The junk factor still bothers me. Why people accept very low Japanese quality (still adequate but built to a price point) and then complain about quality from India, Thailand or China, puzzles me. The ease with which soft luggage can be added, and the Honda fuel capacity (total range) will matter to me, too.

The new Duke 390 is supposed to produce peak 44 hp and 26 ft-lbs (35 Nm) of torque in a 324 lbs. wet package. Early specs suggest peak ratios of 7.6 lb/HP and 9.2 lb/Nm; both are better than the EX300R and CB500 (the shape of the curve still matters), so I'll wait to see the quality of the components and US price point on the India-produced KTM. I'm expecting a very small gas tank (11 liters, 2.9 gal), which may kill the deal if an after-market alternative isn't available.
__________________
1990 Honda NT-650 Hawk-GT

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world;
indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead

Gryphon12 screwed with this post 11-14-2012 at 09:46 AM Reason: Updated specs & corrected units.
Gryphon12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 09:20 AM   #9
Grainbelt
marginal adventurer
 
Grainbelt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Minnyhappiness
Oddometer: 26,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphon12 View Post
It's not the HP rating, or the total weight, but the shape of the HP curve, and most importantly, the shape of the torque curve.
Review in Canada said peak power is at 8,500 RPM, and the bore/stroke is almost exactly square, so I'd expect a pretty flat torque curve. My only concern there is that it could end up being really boring. If I wanted an electric bike, I'd buy one.

Too bad it is so damn hard to get at test ride.
Grainbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 02:24 PM   #10
jbc
Adventurer
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Northwest Pa
Oddometer: 21
http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bike...-honda-cb500x/

Looks like the U.S. models of the honda 500's will have 54 hp at the wheel, therefore with the Kawasaki hp rating at the crank there should be more difference than expected between the kwak and the honda.
jbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 06:32 PM   #11
Meter Man
Living on a prayer
 
Meter Man's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Montana
Oddometer: 7,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphon12 View Post

The junk factor still bothers me. Why people accept very low Japanese quality (still adequate but built to a price point) and then complain about quality from India, Thailand or China, puzzles me. The ease with which soft luggage can be added, and the Honda fuel capacity (total range) will matter to me, too.

.

I hear this "Junk Factor" thing all the time. I don't really understand where it comes from.

The Japanese do, in general, make a non premium motorcycle vs the Euros. That doesn't mean they are junk. Hell, my little Nighthawk 250 has spindly forks and very simple design. It does its mission adequately - It gets me to work, it takes me down a country road at 60 mph, same for the Rebel 250 which sold for decades at $2,999. Both models will still go over 100,000 miles without needed major mechanical work.

Certainly any motorcycle - Euro or Japanese has a set of problems that are inherent to the motorcycle - KLR Doohickey, Aprilia SVX head gasket, DR650 Compression release, Buell Blast Oil Breather etc. All of these are fixable/preventable problems.

Gone are the days of extreme leaking from HD or Triumphs etc.
Meter Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 06:44 PM   #12
Navin
Unwounding
 
Navin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 6,672
Go turn a wrench on a ZX6 and then a Ninja 300. One is well outfitted with decent hardware, bracketry and materials. The other is rivaling a Chinese clone of a Z50. I own the latter right now. My side panel under the seat lost a pin that secures it to the frame while reinstalling it. Just pressing it into the grommet snapped it off and I was being careful as I felt the thing and knew it was brittle junk.

Will it work? Sure. Does it that mean it couldn't be better? My 300 has cheap steel, easily deformed and welds look like crap. By cheap I don't mean just steel is cheap. I have KTMs with good steel frames and tabs. This thing is stamped out of recycled rusty tuna cans.
Navin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:20 PM   #13
cogitate
Beastly Adventurer
 
cogitate's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: North of the Border, CA
Oddometer: 4,539
Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
i've added a few hp and lost a few lbs on my 300 and still spent less $ than the honda, not that it would have changed my mind. 40-50 lbs is alot of weight and i wanted the light ninja 250 feel with better brakes/suspension. It's getting there.

The 300 makes good power from 4k up. It is more of a midrange motor than anything else, nothing like the 250s. 2 up is easy and i'm bumping the cs up a tooth as 1st is too short imo. I start in second 75% of the time now.

I had a 06 ninja 500 as beater just a few years ago and the tossabbility was fun, the junk-o-meter was pegged though. The 300 at least looks better, still crap under the skin, which the honda will probably be too.

210lbs, 6-01" +35 years racing/riding, just off a ktm 950smr.
[/b]

Probably is the key word. I find the value of Hondas to be in the quality of the engineering. I have yet to have a Honda that was crap under the skin, although some are simply built to meet a price point.
__________________
bikeless.

My book "If You Look at Your Health in a New Way..." is available here
and as PDF here
cogitate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:30 PM   #14
Navin
Unwounding
 
Navin's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Oddometer: 6,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by cogitate View Post
[/b]

Probably is the key word. I find the value of Hondas to be in the quality of the engineering. I have yet to have a Honda that was crap under the skin, although some are simply built to meet a price point.

I've had a few XR80s and 100s around for the kids and they are only less offensive because they have less stuff attached!
Navin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:30 PM   #15
GotMojo? OP
Beastly Adventurer
 
GotMojo?'s Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Oddometer: 4,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navin View Post
Go turn a wrench on a ZX6 and then a Ninja 300. One is well outfitted with decent hardware, bracketry and materials. The other is rivaling a Chinese clone of a Z50. I own the latter right now. My side panel under the seat lost a pin that secures it to the frame while reinstalling it. Just pressing it into the grommet snapped it off and I was being careful as I felt the thing and knew it was brittle junk.

Will it work? Sure. Does it that mean it couldn't be better? My 300 has cheap steel, easily deformed and welds look like crap. By cheap I don't mean just steel is cheap. I have KTMs with good steel frames and tabs. This thing is stamped out of recycled rusty tuna cans.
How much more does that ZX6 cost compared to the Ninja 300? Isn't it more than double the price? These "junk" bikes that everybody complains about are not made for us here in the US who have been spoiled by high end expensive bikes.... they're made for the emerging markets who have lower expectations and want (or can only afford) less expensive bikes.
GotMojo? is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014