ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Road warriors
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-12-2009, 09:53 AM   #1
Graemsay OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Oddometer: 456
Touring on Naked Bikes

Most of my riding experience has been on naked bikes, and for relatively short distances in (generally) good weather.

Unfaired bikes strike me as having a few advantages: They're cheaper to buy and insure (the illustrative quote I got for a K1300R was two thirds of that of a K1300S), the (lack of) aerodynamics keep speeds in check, they're generally 10 - 20 kg lighter, and often look cooler.

My brother rides a Speed Triple, and his love affair with nakeds is weakening after crossing the Pennines on it in inclement weather. Plus he found distance to be tiring on it.

So I was wondering what the general opinion is. The Triple isn't exactly the most comfortable bike, so that won't help. Nor does it have any wind protection. (Do those small screens help?)

Thanks!
Graemsay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 09:56 AM   #2
a1fa
Riding Nomad™
 
a1fa's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Arkansas
Oddometer: 13,497
Some people have crossed the Altnatic ocean in row boats.. so what-ever floats your boat. I've done 1500 mile ride on Street TRIPLE, and had a blast. I've done another 1000 miles on a Speed TRIPLE, and had just as much fun.
__________________
Learn to ride. Ride to learn.
a1fa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 10:00 AM   #3
vander
full-time dreamer
 
vander's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Barcelona
Oddometer: 914
Where's the problem if you're travelling on a bike you like? Doing 2 nice things at a time.

I "enjoyed" 14 days of rains and snowfalls in a 17 days tour to the Balcans with my naked bike.
__________________
XTZ
vander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 10:13 AM   #4
McB
Joe 40 ouncer
 
McB's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: North Slope of the Flint Hills
Oddometer: 15,410
Yes, a small screen helps. I had a Slipstreamer Spitfire screen on a DR, and found it actually more comfortable, wind-wise, than that abomination of a fairing on the V-Strom. Which itself is still better than not having one, as it keeps the wind pressure off your chest and neck at least.

I think a naked bike with soft luggage and a smaller, removable windscreen would be a fine way to travel.
McB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 10:21 AM   #5
inline4
Studly Adventurer
 
inline4's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Ozone
Oddometer: 972
fairing

I have naked bikes & bought a fairing for one.....
If I wuz to travel any long distance I would much prefer the one with the fairing.
__________________
$$ The Givers should set the limits,
the Takers never will. $$
inline4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 10:36 AM   #6
Constipated Face
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Singapore
Oddometer: 404
You just have to set it up right. rhys' ride:

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhys

Ok, it's half-faired, but you could get a screen for a 'true' naked.
Constipated Face is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 01:31 PM   #7
Crow
Corvid
 
Crow's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Oddometer: 1,288
I had five middle weight naked bikes before my Super Blackbird - I much prefer the greater power and protection of this faired motorcycle for the type of riding I now mostly do, which is higher speed and longer distance. A common type of riding in the Western US, with long deserts, high plains and great mountains. Given the mountains and canyons, the motorcycle still needs to "handle", though! This one does.
__________________
"Don't believe everything you think!"
2003 Honda CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Crow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 01:50 PM   #8
DRZ400SK4
Beastly Adventurer
 
DRZ400SK4's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Newfoundland
Oddometer: 2,047
I guess the quarter-fairing on my FZ1 doesn't really qualify it as completely naked, but it's close, and it sure is a great bike for touring...







__________________
2008 Yamaha FZ1 / 2009 Kawasaki KLX450R / 2012 Triumph Scrambler

My Photos In Google Earth
DRZ400SK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 02:07 PM   #9
BikePilot
Beastly Adventurer
 
BikePilot's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Tampa
Oddometer: 11,175
I've toured all over the country on a TL100S, 919 and Bandit - all naked or half-naked. I don't get why anyone would want a fully faired bike - I find them hot, turbulent and a bit boring.

I don't even agree that a small screen necessarily helps - you only need to reduce wind pressure on chest etc if the ergonomics of the bike are all wrong for the speeds you ride. If the bike is setup correctly gravity and wind pressure have a way of canceling eachother out.
__________________
'09 Buell XB12XT, TL1000S, H1F, M620, CR250R, KX100, XR650R, Cota 315R

Summer 2009 Ride Report http://advrider.com/forums/showthrea...1509c&t=507038
Summer 2008 RR. http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=367703
BikePilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 02:40 PM   #10
Crow
Corvid
 
Crow's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Oddometer: 1,288
Fly screens make a difference, and the aerodynamics of half-faired and fully-faired bikes are closer than one would think because it's very difficult to clean up the airflow on the bottom half of a motorcycle. Plus, much of that airflow on a fully-faired bike is channeled to feed the radiator, rather than to reduce drag. In one example, a CBR600 without a fairing had 17% more drag than with its fairing. Source: "The Science of Speed", UK's Bike Magazine, June 2008.
__________________
"Don't believe everything you think!"
2003 Honda CBR1100XX Super Blackbird
Crow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 06:47 PM   #11
OnlyVees
Moto-journalist
 
OnlyVees's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: 32°17'31.37N, 110°51'27.00W
Oddometer: 875
The best sport-touring bike I've owned to date was my 03 Tuono. It fit me well, and being from Italy, was geared to the moon- which is nice at 75mph.

And the power...

__________________
2 kids, 1 wife, no bike.
OnlyVees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 07:16 PM   #12
NakedRider
NakedRider
 
NakedRider's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Antelope, CA
Oddometer: 664
I went from California to Ohio and back on an Goldwing back in the 70's. This was when they were a naked bike.

I don't care much for big windshields. Part of the thrill of motorcycle riding is feeling the wind.

To me riding with a windshield is like having sex with a rubber. I'm not saying it still isn't fun. It just doesn't feel as good.
__________________
'09 BMW R1200R
NakedRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 07:49 PM   #13
xshanex
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Oddometer: 895
how much of your riding is going to realistically be long distance touring?

this site is filled with people that seem to buy a lot of their bikes based on their trips which might only account for 2 weeks out of the year or 10% of their mileage for the year

I'd rather have my speed triple which is an absolute blast to ride and suck it up for the long distance stuff than compromise and have something more "economical or sensible or multi-use"
xshanex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 08:05 PM   #14
Z0RR0
Studly Adventurer
 
Z0RR0's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Montreal, CA
Oddometer: 554
Can't tour on a naked? Says who?





I will concede it's not the most comfy, and after 1100km the last few hundred highway clicks were a PITA. But it's my only bike, I commute on it, I go out for fun day trips and longer road trips. Does it all, and the mini windhsield actually works well.

Z0RR0 screwed with this post 10-12-2009 at 08:51 PM
Z0RR0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 08:41 PM   #15
johno
Beastly Adventurer
 
johno's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Mount Gambier, South Australia, Australia.
Oddometer: 2,912
I am on my 2nd BMW R1150R, and used to do 450klm trips on the 1st one with no issues.
With a fly screen, or the one I have now has a taller screen, I am more than happy. As stated, it also keeps your speeds down, so no money loss

I would rather have a bike that fits me comfortably, rather than great weather protection, and so so comfort.
__________________
Down in the land of the confused(mainly me)
johno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014