ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Road warriors
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-04-2013, 03:05 PM   #1
CoffeeBaron OP
Italian Stallions
 
CoffeeBaron's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: North West, UK
Oddometer: 45
Eh? Hondas frugal twin NC700C. Not so...

After spending the last couple of weeks trying to find the log in button, i'm finally getting a chance to throw the cat among the pidgeons so to speak.

I currently ride a 2000 VFR800Fi, and i'm very happy with it, but when you take your bike in to a main dealer and they happen to notice during a routine tyre fitment that it needs new headstock bearings....well, you've a few hours to play with.

This was how I happened to end up on an NC700C test ride. I covered around 150 miles on the bike, and set the trip meter for 126 of them just to get an idea of how little fuel I was going to use up on my gas sipping mule run.

40mpg was all it managed- i managed to drain the tank in 126 miles which with a cost of 139 pence/litre = 40mpg.

Now don't pin me down as one of the haters for this champion of utilitarian motorbike- I enjoyed my time on the bike. It's got a strangely eager engine that revs freely and spins up fast, feeling like it shoul have a redline of around 9k, not the low 6k. Handling was confident and stable, with an ease to tip and flick that brought to mind small japanese 400's like the SuperFour's fom honda.

But I think it would be interesting to hear from someone who hasn't experienced the messianic MPG figures being banded around the net.

Now I will admit I didn't ride with constraint- my journey contained long stints at 100mph, along with some city work and smooth flowing main roads with speeds ranging from 70-80mph. But I still expected to return 60ish mpg figures.

So I'd like to know if anyone else has ridden these bikes and experienced similar poor MPG. For reference I get 42mpg out of my VFR reliably, and that's with similar riding.
CoffeeBaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 03:16 PM   #2
Meter Man
Living on a prayer
 
Meter Man's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Montana
Oddometer: 7,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoffeeBaron View Post
After spending the last couple of weeks trying to find the log in button, i'm finally getting a chance to throw the cat among the pidgeons so to speak.

I currently ride a 2000 VFR800Fi, and i'm very happy with it, but when you take your bike in to a main dealer and they happen to notice during a routine tyre fitment that it needs new headstock bearings....well, you've a few hours to play with.

This was how I happened to end up on an NC700C test ride. I covered around 150 miles on the bike, and set the trip meter for 126 of them just to get an idea of how little fuel I was going to use up on my gas sipping mule run.

40mpg was all it managed- i managed to drain the tank in 126 miles which with a cost of 139 pence/litre = 40mpg.

Now don't pin me down as one of the haters for this champion of utilitarian motorbike- I enjoyed my time on the bike. It's got a strangely eager engine that revs freely and spins up fast, feeling like it shoul have a redline of around 9k, not the low 6k. Handling was confident and stable, with an ease to tip and flick that brought to mind small japanese 400's like the SuperFour's fom honda.

But I think it would be interesting to hear from someone who hasn't experienced the messianic MPG figures being banded around the net.

Now I will admit I didn't ride with constraint- my journey contained long stints at 100mph, along with some city work and smooth flowing main roads with speeds ranging from 70-80mph. But I still expected to return 60ish mpg figures.

So I'd like to know if anyone else has ridden these bikes and experienced similar poor MPG. For reference I get 42mpg out of my VFR reliably, and that's with similar riding.
Imperial or American Gallon?
Meter Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 03:21 PM   #3
oldenuf
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Oddometer: 448
test ride

Greetings,
Sounds like you have the answer to your question already. The NC is not the machine for the way you ride, and the VFR seems to be a good match for you.
Out here in rural USA and two lane roads, I get a steady 65 mpg with the fill-ups.

Art
oldenuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 03:27 PM   #4
Mobiker
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Missouri
Oddometer: 1,641
deleted for not paying attention
__________________
'88 R100GS
'76 xl350
"Don't Panic"
"If I was in a hurry, I'd left earlier."
Mobiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 03:27 PM   #5
ph0rk
Doesn't Care
 
ph0rk's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Oaktown
Oddometer: 2,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoffeeBaron View Post

Now I will admit I didn't ride with constraint- my journey contained long stints at 100mph, along with some city work and smooth flowing main roads with speeds ranging from 70-80mph. But I still expected to return 60ish mpg figures.
aggressive city work and stints of 100mph will drop mpg in the toilet on most efficient bikes, so it isn't much of a surprise.
__________________
--Semantics are everything.
ph0rk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 03:27 PM   #6
dduelin
Oh boy that was close
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Shaft City
Oddometer: 1,348
What's a NC700C?
__________________
Triumph Tiger 800
Honda ST1300
Honda CH80

Dave
dduelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 03:35 PM   #7
Kafn8td
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: May 2012
Oddometer: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by dduelin View Post
What's a NC700C?
It's the bike located right next to the "X" key.
Kafn8td is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 04:19 PM   #8
dduelin
Oh boy that was close
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Shaft City
Oddometer: 1,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kafn8td View Post
It's the bike located right next to the "X" key.
Oh, that makes sense.

I gave the fellow some credibility until he claimed his VFR gets 42 mpg reliably riding 80 to 100 mph. I had a '99 VFR800FI and he's full of crap on that claim. It got low to mid 40's riding briskly but not when riding 45 mph over the limit.

To be fair, I have gotten figures as low as 45 mpg with the X but that was running 150 interstate miles at a steady 80 mph into a 20 mph headwind in temps under 45 degrees. I kind of expected the usual mid 60s mileage to be affected by an airspeed at or near 100 mph.
__________________
Triumph Tiger 800
Honda ST1300
Honda CH80

Dave
dduelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 04:42 PM   #9
mrbreeze
Beastly Adventurer
 
mrbreeze's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Oddometer: 8,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by dduelin View Post
Oh, that makes sense.

I gave the fellow some credibility until he claimed his VFR gets 42 mpg reliably riding 80 to 100 mph. I had a '99 VFR800FI and he's full of crap on that claim. It got low to mid 40's riding briskly but not when riding 45 mph over the limit.

To be fair, I have gotten figures as low as 45 mpg with the X but that was running 150 interstate miles at a steady 80 mph into a 20 mph headwind in temps under 45 degrees. I kind of expected the usual mid 60s mileage to be affected by an airspeed at or near 100 mph.

he's probably talking about imperial gallons, not US gallons
__________________
2013 Suzuki DL650 Adventure

Travels with Maw Maw
mrbreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 04:46 PM   #10
showkey
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Wausau
Oddometer: 1,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by dduelin View Post
Oh, that makes sense.

I gave the fellow some credibility until he claimed his VFR gets 42 mpg reliably riding 80 to 100 mph. I had a '99 VFR800FI and he's full of crap on that claim. It got low to mid 40's riding briskly but not when riding 45 mph over the limit.

To be fair, I have gotten figures as low as 45 mpg with the X but that was running 150 interstate miles at a steady 80 mph into a 20 mph headwind in temps under 45 degrees. I kind of expected the usual mid 60s mileage to be affected by an airspeed at or near 100 mph.
+2 on the above^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Something on the OP......................Does not pass the smell test.......................150 mile test drive????????? and long stints at 100 MPH............the bike is tapped out at 100. Sorry throwing the BS flag.
__________________
1982 CX500 Turbo ,2006 ST1300, 2012 NC700X
1971 CT90,1981 C70, 1986 TRX 250,
1993 TRX300 4X4, 2001 TRX500 4x4, 1987 XR250L

showkey screwed with this post 02-04-2013 at 08:29 PM
showkey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 05:43 PM   #11
Bugz
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Oddometer: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoffeeBaron View Post
After spending the last couple of weeks trying to find the log in button, i'm finally getting a chance to throw the cat among the pidgeons so to speak.

I currently ride a 2000 VFR800Fi, and i'm very happy with it, but when you take your bike in to a main dealer and they happen to notice during a routine tyre fitment that it needs new headstock bearings....well, you've a few hours to play with.

This was how I happened to end up on an NC700C test ride. I covered around 150 miles on the bike, and set the trip meter for 126 of them just to get an idea of how little fuel I was going to use up on my gas sipping mule run.

40mpg was all it managed- i managed to drain the tank in 126 miles which with a cost of 139 pence/litre = 40mpg.

Now don't pin me down as one of the haters for this champion of utilitarian motorbike- I enjoyed my time on the bike. It's got a strangely eager engine that revs freely and spins up fast, feeling like it shoul have a redline of around 9k, not the low 6k. Handling was confident and stable, with an ease to tip and flick that brought to mind small japanese 400's like the SuperFour's fom honda.

But I think it would be interesting to hear from someone who hasn't experienced the messianic MPG figures being banded around the net.

Now I will admit I didn't ride with constraint- my journey contained long stints at 100mph, along with some city work and smooth flowing main roads with speeds ranging from 70-80mph. But I still expected to return 60ish mpg figures.

So I'd like to know if anyone else has ridden these bikes and experienced similar poor MPG. For reference I get 42mpg out of my VFR reliably, and that's with similar riding.
You sir, need to take a look into Brake specific fuel consumption.

And onther hint: The NC700 was designed to be designed as a motorbike to be operated at how 90% of the motorcyclist tend to drive. Which is below 6000 RPM and below 130 km/h.

Don't be suprised by running 100 mph (160 km/h) you're going to get pretty bad economy. Keep the NC below 75 mph and you'll be getting 60 - 75 MPG (US) depending on your cruising speed and driving habbits.
Bugz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 08:23 PM   #12
cbolling
Here...Hold my Beer.
 
cbolling's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Oddometer: 2,732
You ran it at 100 mph for extended periods and still got 42 mpg. That sounds pretty good to me.
__________________
2011 Kawasaki Versys

http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=661436
cbolling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 09:08 PM   #13
nachtflug
infidel
 
nachtflug's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Location: Harrys place
Oddometer: 46,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoffeeBaron View Post
stints at 100mph, along with some city work and smooth flowing main roads with speeds ranging from 70-80mph. But I still expected to return 60ish mpg figures.
don't buy any land in south florida without seeing it first.
nachtflug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 01:05 AM   #14
oldenuf
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Oddometer: 448
Nc

Quote:
Originally Posted by nachtflug View Post
don't buy any land in south florida without seeing it first.
And buying a demo machine

Art
oldenuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 01:50 AM   #15
ZZ-R Rider
Captain Fantastic
 
ZZ-R Rider's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: Far East of the Western World
Oddometer: 460
Imp. Gallon mpg figures should be higher than US Gallon mpg figures as the Imperial Gallon is 20% larger than the US Gallon ...
__________________
Before you diagnose yourself with depression or low self esteem, first make sure that you are not, in fact, just surrounded by arseholes ...
ZZ-R Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014