ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Riding > Layin' down tracks
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-25-2013, 10:12 AM   #1
trampaslake OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Oddometer: 247
24K vs. 100K

Hello all,

I'm considering purchasing a Montana.

I've never had topo maps on a GPS before but am intrigued by the idea. I'll be doing alot of riding and hiking with the unit.

I've watched videos comparing the two maps and I wonder if the 24K maps can become cluttered since the topo lines can be so close together. I imagine riding in the mountains and the screen being practically covered with topo lines.

Is is possible turn down the detail on 24K maps if I'm not needing it?

Or would I be better off going with the 100K and losing some detail if I zoom way in?

Thanks
trampaslake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 10:47 AM   #2
DSM8
Where fun goes to die....
 
DSM8's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Glendora, Ca
Oddometer: 3,615
You can adjust the detail of the topo maps as they are displayed.
Re you other question I dont know.

I have the 60CSX and run the 24K maps, they are easy enough to read. And will provide more detail than the 100K as needed.
__________________
DSM8 - A different kind of mean
SQL > SELECT finger FROM hand WHERE id=3
http://share.findmespot.com/shared/f...d5LbKWMz6cHxaH
DSM8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 11:21 AM   #3
mcnut
Beastly Adventurer
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Bakersfield CA & Sammamish WA
Oddometer: 1,358
The 100k has the same issue of clutter but as has been stated you can set the detail lower but then you also loose other map data ( at a given zoom level).

It may be possible on the Montana to control the contour lines separately from other data. I say that because it is possible in the BaseCamp profiles, unfortunately only on/off.

To really get the most out of a GPS on-road & off-road requires several mapsets be loaded.

Bruce
mcnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 11:34 AM   #4
trampaslake OP
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Oddometer: 247
Yeah I'm coming to that conclusion too.

Thanks!




Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnut View Post
The 100k has the same issue of clutter but as has been stated you can set the detail lower but then you also loose other map data ( at a given zoom level).

It may be possible on the Montana to control the contour lines separately from other data. I say that because it is possible in the BaseCamp profiles, unfortunately only on/off.

To really get the most out of a GPS on-road & off-road requires several mapsets be loaded.

Bruce
trampaslake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 02:38 PM   #5
swaanimal
Adventurer
 
swaanimal's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: DFW MetroMess (Keller)
Oddometer: 33
The 100k maps are not as accurate as the 24k maps. When trip planning, I was getting frustrated with the trails not matching Google satellite view until I switched to the 24k maps. My GPS zooms to match the speed traveled over ground (which when trail riding in the mountains is not all that fast) and the screen is never cluttered. I often have to zoom out to get an overview to verify where we are at on the map. IMO the 24k maps are the way to go.
__________________
Jason
'03 BMW K1200LTC (RIP)
'03 KAW KLX400r (street legal)
'95 SUZ DR125SE (street legal)
swaanimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014