ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Thumpers
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-25-2013, 10:18 AM   #1
RidingDonkeys OP
Purveyor of Awesome
 
RidingDonkeys's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Pines, North Carolina, USA
Oddometer: 7,642
The Official Stefan Pierer Husqvarna Business Strategy Thread...

Alright, all you FF's here in Thumpers seem to think you know how to handle Husky better than Pierer. Well, instead of cluttering up all the other threads, here is the place to bring the banter.

We think the Nuda is gone.

But the TR650 is the best dual-sport out there under $8k, so it has to stay, right?

But what about that BMW engine? He can't keep that, we've seen the contract! Oh wait, we haven't seen it!

Let's all get together and speculate!
__________________
Clinging to sanity, one motorcycle at a time.
RidingDonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 10:27 PM   #2
Howlinsage
n00b
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: North Okanagan
Oddometer: 7
I'll bite.
First off, kudos to Husky for breathing some excitement into the Rotax lump.
Bmw must be a little embarrassed,they had it 20yrs and missed it.
If SP can't make money by buying engines from BMW then he will surely
build his own and it will not be the 690 {too expensive}. To keep the price in line my bet is on a yet again larger KTM390 Duke engine of 600cc made by Bajaj in India.
A new engine means new frame so it will be all new.
Early reports on the 390 Duke are very positive, performs at the same level as the new cb500 twins. Honda 54hp and 430lb wet - 390 Duke 44hp and 330lb wet {yes 100lbs lighter} and its only 375cc
I predict 6spd 50-55hp at the wheel and 360-380lb wet and 9" suspension. Price $7000-$8000USD
The engine needs to be all day smooth at highway speeds because it will be compared to the TR650 which is the current standard.
Howlinsage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 12:45 AM   #3
RidingDonkeys OP
Purveyor of Awesome
 
RidingDonkeys's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Pines, North Carolina, USA
Oddometer: 7,642
Interesting theory. Thats is the first mention of the 390 that iI have heard. I could get excited about that. My only complaint about the TR is that it is 400lbs. It surely doesnt feel like it, but I would still like to see it 40lbs lighter.

The 390 engine could lead to a lighter bike at the same price point. I think keeping the price low is crucial to selling the Terra, so that could be a winning idea.

Sent from the voices in my head and transcribed by their drinking buddy...
__________________
Clinging to sanity, one motorcycle at a time.
RidingDonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 08:52 AM   #4
trainman
Gnarly Adventurer
 
trainman's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Oddometer: 389
I tried to look at Husqvarna on how I would take the company where it would be profitable and not compete with KTM as I have 51% interest in the company. First I would want my line of bike to be sellable worldwide, that is models that are priced equal to or less if possible then the Japanese models that they would compete with. I would want a line of bikes that are endure models and no street legal bike that I would call ROAD bikes. I would keep the TE models and the TR models for both types of riders, that is street/off road and dirt only models. Motocross models are out, there is no way Husky can compete with the big five, Honda, Suzuki, Yamaha, Kawasaki, and KTM. Now it comes down to the Strada and the Terra, both bikes have put Husky back on the map, but what we don't know is what is their deal with BMW and Rotax, I would think that BMW holds the say so here with Rotax, so what will BMW let Husky have in the future. I got the impression that BMW just wanted out and wash their hands of the whole thing, so where does that leave the Terra and Strada. I personally think it's a big factor if the 650 survives with the Rotax engine or not, redesign will cost a lot of money and the buying public may not want to pay for it. I would think that the company needs to down size their line of bikes, price their bikes inline with the other manufactures, hope the 650's can survive, and get a dealer network better then they have. We all know that sales is were it's at, sell bike that are sellable and dump the non-selling stuff, I would.

John
trainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 09:38 AM   #5
RidingDonkeys OP
Purveyor of Awesome
 
RidingDonkeys's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Pines, North Carolina, USA
Oddometer: 7,642
Building bikes in Europe is expensive business. Unions, strikes, taxes, and an unfavorable exchange rate make it difficult to be competitive. The European car manufacturers figured this out over a decade ago, and started setting up shop in the USA. Profit margins are slim enough on motorcycles that I think you would have to bypass the US altogether and go straight to Asia for production.

So presuming they did that, they could still stay competitive with the Japanese bikes as far as price goes. But could they maintain the quality?
__________________
Clinging to sanity, one motorcycle at a time.
RidingDonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 09:41 AM   #6
xr400r
Beastly Adventurer
 
xr400r's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: riding usa
Oddometer: 3,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidingDonkeys View Post
Building bikes in Europe is expensive business. Unions, strikes, taxes, and an unfavorable exchange rate make it difficult to be competitive. The European car manufacturers figured this out over a decade ago, and started setting up shop in the USA. Profit margins are slim enough on motorcycles that I think you would have to bypass the US altogether and go straight to Asia for production.

So presuming they did that, they could still stay competitive with the Japanese bikes as far as price goes. But could they maintain the quality?
Profit margins are slim on motorcycles? What is slim? Any facts to back this up?
xr400r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:00 AM   #7
RidingDonkeys OP
Purveyor of Awesome
 
RidingDonkeys's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Pines, North Carolina, USA
Oddometer: 7,642
Yeah, just look up any of the major manufacturers' profit margins. Most are public companies and publish these things. Bajaj normally rules the roost, and they top out at 20%

http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/bus...in_705710.html

Harley normally does better, but they sell more merch than motorbike, which naturally leads to higher margins as a company.
__________________
Clinging to sanity, one motorcycle at a time.
RidingDonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:07 AM   #8
Tome
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Tome's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Oddometer: 319
From what I've read the road bikes are being ditched completely and one direction SP is looking at going is using a platform sharing system (like VAG cars do) across all 3 brands. While I think that could work, I don't think there would be enough difference between them all to justify any price differences but then again if one brands bikes just don't work then they won't sell at all.
Tome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:18 AM   #9
itsatdm
Beastly Adventurer
 
itsatdm's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Nor Ca.
Oddometer: 4,545
Pierer has recognised it is a world market. BMW and KTM have partnered with companies like Loncin and Bajaj not only to get cheaper production, but use as a foot in the door for sales. Loncin has introduced a 650 bike based on the old Rotax engine. KTM has a couple small bikes and just intro'd the 390 in India. After the Husqvaran sale, BMW partnered with TVS, India's 4th largest bike manufacture. These emerging markets have great growth potential.

Compare that with what Pierer has said about Europe and the US. Husqvarna lost 34mil Euro's in 2012. He predicts a 14% reduction in sales for Europe in 2013/2014. The US has positive sales, but no where what they used to be.

He has stated his business plan many times. Basically it will be high end bikes for Europe and the US, involvement in racing for name recognition and more involvement in the emerging markets which is predominately Japanese.

He has stated his plan for Husqvarna. He has slammed the direction BMW took the company describing as too road orientated and wants to take it back to its roots.

It is not just sales that generate profits, it involves cutting cost too. One way doing that is using common parts over a range bikes and models. BMW based engines don't fit. You don't have the control necessary to keep costs down.

I think the profit margin on Terra's/Strada is very low. It is a much more modern and complex bike, assembled in in a country heavily unionized and yet it sells for $500 more than an old tech bike manufactured in Thailand.

Last year the emerging markets were down also, yet Bajaj sold 900,000 bikes and Loncin 2,000,000. Cheap bikes for the masses maybe, but a much greater future possibility.
__________________
BMW Motorrad USA customer service: "We make superior motorcycles and continue to improve them."

itsatdm screwed with this post 04-26-2013 at 11:29 AM
itsatdm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:19 AM   #10
trainman
Gnarly Adventurer
 
trainman's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Oddometer: 389
I agree things cost more to build in Europe, but I thought we were on the World Market program these days. Maybe you have to adjust your production cost, may it be labor or county of production, but you either want to be in business or not. I personally don't want to pay more for products just to support other counties ways of doing business, life styles, whatever. Let's face it, Husqvarna is not the end all bike out there today, I just have to go down the street and I will fine another manufacture that is equal, or better at a lower price. I agree with itsatdm post, it pretty much says it all, modernize your bikes and production methods, or be gone.

John

trainman screwed with this post 04-26-2013 at 10:27 AM
trainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:50 AM   #11
larryboy
Paint it black.
 
larryboy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Über Alles,Ca
Oddometer: 13,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by trainman View Post
I tried to look at Husqvarna on how I would take the company where it would be profitable and not compete with KTM as I have 51% interest in the company.

John

Me too and if I were Stefan I'd throw some red/white plastic on a few KTM's and get even richer.

Husqvarna is dead.
larryboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:03 AM   #12
trainman
Gnarly Adventurer
 
trainman's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Oddometer: 389
Husqvarna is Dead, maybe true, don't discard the idea that Pierer bought the company to dissolve it, wouldn't that put KTM pretty much the only company out there with bike of that class. It's done everyday folks, but time will tell.
Why do you think the 650 Terra and Strada are discounted, they are using up their inventory of parts.

John
trainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:23 AM   #13
RidingDonkeys OP
Purveyor of Awesome
 
RidingDonkeys's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Pines, North Carolina, USA
Oddometer: 7,642
I absolutely think the TR650 is dead. That's why I bought one when I could.

However, I don't think Husky is dead. Stefan Pierer has publicly stated that he intends to follow in the footsteps of VW and their business model.

VW: Low end.
Audi: High end.
Common parts and engineering: PLENTIFUL


I think you'll see the same relationship with Husky and KTM, with KTM being the higher end line.
__________________
Clinging to sanity, one motorcycle at a time.
RidingDonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:47 AM   #14
Tome
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Tome's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Oddometer: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by trainman View Post
Why do you think the 650 Terra and Strada are discounted, they are using up their inventory of parts.
Was thinking about this after hearing something about Saab and spares, I heard that a manufacturer has to produce parts for 10 years once a model is changed/discontinued. Thinking this would be impossible for a defunct manufacturer (despite someone taking on Saab parts) I looked into it and they don't have to do anything at all! So a cheap Husky now might seem a good cheap prospect but there's going to be a lot of unique parts with questionable parts backup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RidingDonkeys View Post
However, I don't think Husky is dead. Stefan Pierer has publicly stated that he intends to follow in the footsteps of VW and their business model.

VW: Low end.
Audi: High end.
Common parts and engineering: PLENTIFUL

I think you'll see the same relationship with Husky and KTM, with KTM being the higher end line.
I think this would be a good move but I think it would harder to make the models unique (and you forgot Skoda > Seat > VW > Audi :P )
Tome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 05:43 PM   #15
Howlinsage
n00b
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: North Okanagan
Oddometer: 7
I guess my bet is right!

http://www.indiancarsbikes.in/motorc...n-india-70199/
Howlinsage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014