ADVrider

Go Back   ADVrider > Bikes > Trials
User Name
Password
Register Inmates Photos Site Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-10-2014, 07:49 AM   #1
2feetdown OP
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Location: missouri
Oddometer: 88
Whats the latest on no-stop

I just found this forum a couple of months ago so maybe this has already been talked about.

I see where El trial just ran in California was ran no-stop. I know the has been much debate on stop. I don't like posting negative but i have a fear that this will divide a sport that needs to grow. I know while I personalty would benefit from no-stop due to my limited skills I also like to see the upper class ride and use there skills. When i watched my first world round I couldn't wait to see all the big stuff they rode and ended up enjoying more just watching how they stopped hopped and got set up to ride the big rocks
I intend to ride sections every weekend either ones me and a couple of buddies want to set up and ride or at an event, I am torn between the two a lot of times. Some of the guys i ride with can hop a bit and can stop and balance for way longer than i can but i wouldn't dream of changing the rules so I can do better and if i did they would find someone less selfish to ride with.
I never dreamed that that my old toilet stool would be outlawed that my trials bike would be considered a polluter vrs a racing bike and cant be 2 stroke period(they came to there senses on that at least for know). There is many government regulations that seem ridiculous but for local clubs to limit whether a rider can stop or not beats those hands down.
2feetdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 08:19 AM   #2
Dorian
Xlg carbon footprint
 
Dorian's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: WA State
Oddometer: 679
__________________
"All terror should be this pretty" - Ranjan

www.psermc.org




Dorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 08:47 AM   #3
laser17
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Boston,Massachusetts
Oddometer: 654
The no stop people have there heads down and are insisting its working while repeating the same tired propaganda.

The Stop allowed people are still outraged over the change and are still waiting for market data statistics that drove this stick in the eye to the majority of trials riders.

Meanwhile, Stop allowed organizations are starting to appear.

I really hope that the NATC ASKS THE RIDERS what they want before making any changes.
laser17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 10:43 AM   #4
motobene
Motoing for 43 years
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita Mountains SW Oklahoma
Oddometer: 836
I hope the NATC will read this and truly understand it. My thoughts:

Let's call this directly what it is: pause prohibition. No stop doesn't quite describe what is lost, and it certainly doesn't claim to gain anything. While rules are important, all of us can think of silly rules that end up causing more harm than good, despite the initial good intention. And once implemented, bad rules can take a lot of years to get rid of.

The bottom line is that many of us don’t like years of developed skills converted by writ into instant full section failures. Those of you in favor of pause prohibition, please consider that no one is stopping you from riding any section anywhere without pauses. But supporting or imposing pause prohibition on the rest of us requires that you take away something we have gained at great cost. Leaving well enough alone costs you nothing, but implementing pause prohibition costs us, a lot. On the one hand, you ride as YOU choose. On the other, you prevent us from riding as we choose. We call that theft.

We hoped the FIM would rescind the ‘French (Thierry Michaud) Imposition’ of pause prohibition for 2014, after the 1st year of protests, but sadly, and despite the expressed dislike of the rule by the majority, they stubbornly persisted in 2014 in outdoor competitions (indoor is not a viable sport without pauses... hmm). This same FIM puts out videos chopping rides into milliseconds with pumping music. I’d like to think it’s for the chopped-up attention spans of youth, but what’s missing from a sustained look these days?

We also hoped countries down to the local levels would summarily ignore the FIM and continue with pause allowed. It’s not hard to intuit the negative effects of whacking riders with 5s for pausing, either because they can, hope to without points, or they use pauses to ride safer. And there’s that obvious problem of making sections harder to judge fairly. How much of a pause is a real pause, really?

And where is the real need for this rule? The data to support it? Or even the will of the majority?

There are already natural forces in place that resist pausing. N additional rule is needed. Riders struggle for years to avoid involuntary pauses from not looking ahead, poor line selection, ‘whiskey throttle’ or hyperactive clutching. The natural spanking force is simply more points taken.

Imposing pause prohibition denies the rest of us the voluntary pause. Consider safety. This 59-year-old Senior Expert/Expert uses the tool of pausing precisely to avoid injury. I know myself. I’m more dangerous to myself if pausing will result in a 5. Pause prohibition creates a psychological sword of Damocles, a 5-avoidance blow torch to the brain and ass. That WILL push competitive types like me into continuing at time when I should not. One of the big positives of trials is long-term sustainability. Don't steal away one of my critical tools, or I may deem the risk greater than the reward.

Some may argue that pause prohibition will make sections easier, and that somehow will have new riders falling from the sky. I challenge you to determine what percentage of sections can already be ridden no pause if a rider chooses to ride them that way. I'd venture it's over 95%. It may not be safer, but it can be done. So where are the thousands of riders if pausing was such a big problem?

Many of us don’t want pause prohibition turning our acquired skill into 100% section failures. And regarding section difficulty, if that is more the problem, shame on any one or any club, that values hammering riders to a pulp. And that too is self correcting. You club will shrink and you'll get a clue.

So again, where is the real-world justification for this rule when pauses are both naturally resisted and beneficial?

And there's the good-old-days argument. Sentimentality for days past days when it took a gorilla arm to pull in a clutch isn’t adequate justification for pause prohibition locally.

As for The Michaud Imposition at the top outdoor level, we're into the second year now. Where is the objective data on rider participation and event attendance? Has trials been saved yet?

I caution all you influential folks not to jump into this. Experiment, fine, but don't just dive in and impose stuff on us we don't want. Trials is already barely alive. We're delicate. Take care before nudging us closer to the grave.
motobene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 10:59 AM   #5
motobene
Motoing for 43 years
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita Mountains SW Oklahoma
Oddometer: 836
Please someone who knows, please pass this thread (and anything else out there) on to those involved in the NATC. I don't personally know many of them.

Let's call this directly what it is: pause prohibition. No stop doesn't quite describe what is lost, and it certainly doesn't claim to gain anything. While rules are important, all of us can think of silly rules that end up causing more harm than good, despite the initial good intention. And once implemented, bad rules can take a lot of years to get rid of.

The bottom line is that many of us don’t like years of developed skills converted by writ into instant full section failures. Those of you in favor of pause prohibition, please consider that no one is stopping you from riding any section anywhere without pauses. But supporting or imposing pause prohibition on the rest of us requires that you take away something we have gained at great cost. Leaving well enough alone costs you nothing, but implementing pause prohibition costs us, a lot. On the one hand, you ride as YOU choose. On the other, you prevent us from riding as we choose. We call that theft.

We hoped the FIM would rescind the ‘French (Thierry Michaud) Imposition’ of pause prohibition for 2014, after the 1st year of protests, but sadly, and despite the expressed dislike of the rule by the majority, they stubbornly persisted in 2014 in outdoor competitions (indoor is not a viable sport without pauses... hmm). This same FIM puts out videos chopping rides into milliseconds with pumping music. I’d like to think it’s for the chopped-up attention spans of youth, but what’s missing from a sustained look these days?

We also hoped countries down to the local levels would summarily ignore the FIM and continue with pause allowed. It’s not hard to intuit the negative effects of whacking riders with 5s for pausing, either because they can, hope to without points, or because they use pauses to ride safer.

And there’s that obvious problem of making sections harder to judge fairly. How much of a pause is a real pause, really?

Where is the real need for this rule? The data to support it? Or even the will of the majority?

There are already natural forces in place that resist pausing. No additional rule is needed. Riders struggle for years to avoid involuntary pauses from not looking ahead, poor line selection, ‘whiskey throttle’ or hyperactive clutching. The natural spanking force is simply more points taken.

Imposing pause prohibition denies the rest of us the voluntary pause. Consider safety. This 59-year-old Senior Expert/Expert uses the tool of pausing precisely to avoid injury. I know myself. I’m more dangerous to myself if pausing will result in a 5. Pause prohibition creates a psychological sword of Damocles, a 5-avoidance blow torch to the brain and ass. That WILL push competitive types like me into continuing at times when I should not. One of the big positives of trials is long-term sustainability. Don't steal away one of my critical tools, or I may deem the risk greater than the reward.

Some may argue that pause prohibition will make sections easier, and that somehow we’ll have new riders falling from the sky. I challenge you to determine what percentage of sections can already be ridden no pause if a rider chooses to ride them that way. I'd venture it's over 95%. It may not be safer that way, but it can be done.

Many of us don’t want pause prohibition turning our acquired skill into 100% section failures. And regarding section difficulty, if that is more the problem, shame on any one or any club that hammering riders to a pulp. That too is self correcting and doesn’t need a rule. Clubs that hammer, shrink.

So again, where is the real-world justification for this rule when pauses are both naturally resisted and at time quite beneficial, even satisfying?

And there's the good-old-days argument. Sentimentality for days past days, when it took a gorilla arm to pull in a clutch and cranks could be used as anchors isn’t adequate justification for pause prohibition for modern trials.

As for The Michaud Imposition at the top outdoor level, we're into the second year now. Where is the objective data on rider participation and event attendance? Has trials been saved yet? Let’s say the objective data show no change. In that case the change has been a failure because we’re fighting about it, and there are enough eternal threats to keep us busy a long time.

I caution all you influential folks not to jump into this. Experiment, fine, but don't just follow FIM and impose stuff a significant percentage of us – likely the majority - don't want. We don’t need any more self-inflicted wounds.
motobene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 11:01 AM   #6
motobene
Motoing for 43 years
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita Mountains SW Oklahoma
Oddometer: 836
Sometimes the forum software brings up a blank page when I try to edit a posting. I think it has a problem with text brought in from Word.

Sorry for the redundant postings. The second post with smaller font is the latest. I hope later I can nuke the first and fix the font in the second.

Yes, I'm passionate about this issue, so pardon my detail. But in this case I feel justified in being a bit 'political.' It's the theft angle that gets to me.

motobene screwed with this post 04-10-2014 at 11:15 AM
motobene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 11:31 AM   #7
laser17
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Boston,Massachusetts
Oddometer: 654
Very, Very well said Bene. - Prohibition just doesn't work!

I am one of the people who really doesn't get affected - I will hop around sometimes when im in trouble, but other than that dont need to hop given the Int level I ride at. Many, many times i was convinced a section couldnt be cleaned w/o hoping, along comes a talented rider who makes it look easy.

I feel bad for those who put in the work to obtain the needed skills, but my personal desire "for stop" is alittle self centered. I enjoy watching the good riders get behind in the clock and endurocross the easier parts of the section. Wicked flashy moves! They REALLY need to ban the word dynamic from being used when describing no stop, because watching someone slowly creep around the section is BORING as HELL to watch!

My mother used to have an expression that you dont throw the baby out with the bathwater. I really think thats what the FIM did when a few tweaks would have been much better and much less obtrusive to riders rights.

laser17 screwed with this post 04-10-2014 at 11:46 AM
laser17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 11:43 AM   #8
2feetdown OP
Adventurer
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Location: missouri
Oddometer: 88
Very well said motobeen
I am glad someone better versed than me to respond as i am a poor one to start this thread. However if we would invoke punctuation prohibition then i might come closer
2feetdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 12:15 PM   #9
laser17
Studly Adventurer
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Boston,Massachusetts
Oddometer: 654
Dynamic/ Exciting - note how the riders buy time by going fast in the easier parts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM2MFZqWDKk

Good, but not as exciting, and yes edited to cut out the slow creep along parts...yet the politicians use the word dynamic when describing there "vision". I say vision, but it more closely represents a hallucination.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yW-Uk7BFhc


Now - what sport do you think is more attractive. I dont care how many times TM insists its no stop, because, In this case, the king has no cloths.
laser17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 12:27 PM   #10
PSchrauber
Studly Adventurer
 
PSchrauber's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Summer: Kemiö, Finland; Winter: North Germany
Oddometer: 800
I'am following trials since 1979 all in all the stop was latly abused in modern trials as a stop with one foot down was rated with only one point. Trials was esthablished in 1909 as a trial to keep the feet up while going through rough terrain. While riding through the section footing means a penelty (1 - 3) as not to finish (5) or even not to try (10 points), these are the main rules and should not be changed.

The intention and also the accentuation of the dynamic's is completly OK.

It looks very cheap when a rider instead of doing a close turn, try to hop around the corner or try to correct a wrong chosen track by hopping around.

My main criticism of the stop and hop is the possibility of the correction of incorrectly selected tracks, that's what brakes down real trial in the true sense.
PSchrauber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:27 PM   #11
motobene
Motoing for 43 years
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita Mountains SW Oklahoma
Oddometer: 836
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSchrauber View Post
I'am following trials since 1979 all in all the stop was latly abused in modern trials as a stop with one foot down was rated with only one point. Trials was esthablished in 1909 as a trial to keep the feet up while going through rough terrain. While riding through the section footing means a penelty (1 - 3) as not to finish (5) or even not to try (10 points), these are the main rules and should not be changed.

The intention and also the accentuation of the dynamic's is completly OK.

It looks very cheap when a rider instead of doing a close turn, try to hop around the corner or try to correct a wrong chosen track by hopping around.

My main criticism of the stop and hop is the possibility of the correction of incorrectly selected tracks, that's what brakes down real trial in the true sense.
You represent the fundamentalist camp, and you also ride a vintage bike. I don't mind your vintage rules being based in the past, but please don't force your world to be mine

I too respect the traditions and fundamentals of the sport, but those from 1909 probably considered themselves as riding 'real' trials. They would be shocked at your alien modern vintage bike and your crazy modern 1978 rules. Perhaps they might say you are not riding 'real' trials?

It works both ways.
motobene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:34 PM   #12
motobene
Motoing for 43 years
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita Mountains SW Oklahoma
Oddometer: 836
Quote:
Originally Posted by laser17 View Post
Dynamic/ Exciting - note how the riders buy time by going fast in the easier parts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM2MFZqWDKk

Good, but not as exciting, and yes edited to cut out the slow creep along parts...yet the politicians use the word dynamic when describing there "vision". I say vision, but it more closely represents a hallucination.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yW-Uk7BFhc


Now - what sport do you think is more attractive. I dont care how many times TM insists its no stop, because, In this case, the king has no cloths.
Oh gosh....

One thing I didn't think so much about until watching these videos is how no pause creates a frenetic riding style. The rider has the blow torch on his mind and on his ass to always keep going. That is indeed not pretty at all. I wonder what the riders say about the experience?

Thanks all for your comments.
motobene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 02:53 PM   #13
Old Geezer
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Old Geezer's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: New Mexico
Oddometer: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by motobene View Post
you represent the fundamentalist camp, and you also ride a vintage bike. I don't mind your vintage rules being based in the past, but please don't force your world to be mine

i too respect the traditions and fundamentals of the sport, but those from 1909 probably considered themselves as riding 'real' trials. They would be shocked at your alien modern vintage bike and your crazy modern 1978 rules. Perhaps they might say you are not riding 'real' trials?

It works both ways.
+1
__________________
Old Geezer on a Old Weezer

76 TY175
Whitehawk 80
Old Geezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 03:16 PM   #14
Gordo83
Gnarly Adventurer
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: New England
Oddometer: 120
One thing's for sure. It will be hard on checkers to decide quickly whether they saw a slow pause or a stop.
Gordo83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 03:30 PM   #15
jonnyc21
n00b sums it up.
 
jonnyc21's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Boise aria
Oddometer: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by motobene View Post
You represent the fundamentalist camp, and you also ride a vintage bike. I don't mind your vintage rules being based in the past, but please don't force your world to be mine

I too respect the traditions and fundamentals of the sport, but those from 1909 probably considered themselves as riding 'real' trials. They would be shocked at your alien modern vintage bike and your crazy modern 1978 rules. Perhaps they might say you are not riding 'real' trials?

It works both ways.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Geezer View Post
+1
+2

For me, when the rider has the space for the turn and they hop it exposes that they picked the wrong line and shows a possible weakness rather than looks cheap. For me this helps me see which riders really have the skills and witch do not.

Just my 2 cents...
jonnyc21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

.
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Times are GMT -7.   It's 09:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ADVrider 2011-2014