Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Battle Scooters' started by sinned, Dec 21, 2012.
Kymco = Taiwan.
Not the same thing as the PRC.
Sorry, wasn't trolling.
And I agree, quality is quality regardless of source.
Diggin' the GT.
As I said, BMW lost me. I do not buy from corporate stores or dealers. It is no longer the Legendary Motorcycles of Germany.
The end started with Dave Robb. Sorry, not my cup of tea - but they sold bikes, and no, wait, lost market for years.
I do not, however, criticize or care what anyone else chooses to ride - it's your money, your choice, and I hope it serves you well.
And that is all
I am not sure whether your comments refer to the USA only because I live on the other side of the pond.
On this side of the Atlantic - and I suggest in the rest of the world - BMW, Ducati and Triumph are the only ones close to maintaining their sales figures or even growing. So they must be doing something right.
To my European eyes the BMW cruisers looked stunning, but even David Robb admits that BMW did not get that whole deal quite right.
The Suzuki Burgman cost $10,000, and they do not even offer heated grips or a heated seat. Many scooter riders use their scooters year round for daily transportation.
BMW also has their wondeful on the fly adjustable electric windshield.
I currently have both a 650 Burgman and a 750 Slash 6. Either scooter would "blow it's doors off"
The exec. does come with heated seat and grips for 2014.
Partially correct. It is the 2013 Burgman Exec that is to be released very soon. It indeed has a heated seat and heated grips. Just not in the US. Nor is it even an option in the US. So from where *I* sit, BMW has the edge there. If you could get the Burgy with the heaters, you would be real close to the BMW in price point (2013 Burgman Exec 650 pricing is still TBA). Both have electric adjustable windshields. Only thing stopping me from the BMW is the rumored costs for the scheduled maintenance.
In Europe. Not even offered in the US, at least per the magazines, Burgman forum and the Suzuki rep at the Long Beach Moto Show.
Does the Burgy shield work the same as the BMW? Sort of eliptical?
Also, do you know if the scheduled maintenance is on the easy to do, or super complex?
The Burgman is a PIA to work on because of the tupperware but once it comes off, everything is accessible and nothing is called for beyond routine adjustments and replacement of fluids and filters. The major service intervals are every 15000 miles. https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pnU2vkbpOMEk5Qay0hCnXUA
There is lots of information on the BUSA forum if you want to know more.
I just brought home my 2012 Burgman 650 Executive and I really like the CVT tranny!
I looked at and actually test rode both the BMW C650's and after much careful consideration, I bought the Burgman.
The main reasons I picked the Burgman over the BMWs is this:
1) The Burgman's been around and has a decent track record. BMW has NO track record on the C650's and they are a FIRST YEAR beta bike.
Even the service manager at my local BMW dealer couldn't say how long the belt would last, but that replacing it was expensive. There are Burgman riders who have over 80000 miles on their belts.
2) The CVT on the BMW is 100% pure automatic. Fine if that floats your boat. On the Burgman you have the choice of selecting "D" for fully automatic, or if you are a bit more "hands on", then you can select "M" and now you can paddle shift to 6 preset "shift" ratios. NICE! Then there is the "Power" mode which raises the "shift" ratios up by several hundred RPM for more aggressive shifting and passing.
3) When it comes to looks, I felt the Burgman was a nicer looking bike. The BMW's were a bit too sharp edged for my likes.
The above were reason enough for me to pick the Burgman.
The suspension comparison between the 2 brands is moot. They both are relative crappy and harsh (compared to my 05 RT).
I would consider the ride to be a draw.
The windshield on both are also in serious need of aftermarket enhancement. I am 5' 9" and even with the electrically powered winshields of both brands in the fully up position, there is a lot of buffeting around the sides and back and the noise is very noticeable.
It WOULD be very nice if heated grips and seats were available on the Burgman, but...oh well. I do live in SoCal after all.
This is all IMHO and YMMV of course.
Burgman over BMW? But dude, you're deutsch!
Wow that was nice, not:eek1
. Anyway I was at the BMW dealer getting quick disconnects for my 1150GS and they had the new BMW scooter, holy cow that thing is a behemouth. It really didnt do a thing for me to tell you the truth, I would never spend that kind of coin on that ugly monster, but to each his own...
He didn't say he was a D-Bag; though that is what I originally thought it said.
It went right over my head. Anyhow....
I just rode one of the 650s, and it is a phenomenal ride.
I just got finished riding both the Burg and the 650 GT, very similar in power and style but I'm going with the GT, I like it's sharper looking form and the service at the local BMW dealer is outstanding, riding the GT was a blast, the Burg, not so much IMHO.
I now have 6k miles on it and my initial impressions have been confirmed. I'm kind of embarrassed by the low miles so far but after a 400 mile day tomorrow, my spring semester will be over and I can start racking up the miles for the summer. I'm still waiting on someone to come out with a seat and a windshield. Oh, and an auxiliary fuel tank set up to extend the range. And thus the difference between the GT and my former scooter (Yamaha Majesty). The GT is a touring bike you step through instead of swing over where as the Majesty is a scooter that can dance the interstate shuffle without breaking a heel. Stability vs. agility, comfort vs. nimbleness, 1000 miles @ 80mph vs. an afternoon cruising back roads to nowhere. As I said before, 2/3 motorcycle and 1/3 scooter. Think of it as a K1600GT distilled to just what you need plus a few things you really want. I may be a small niche demographic but it fits my needs perfectly... aside from the mods mentioned above.
I have owned two Burgman 650 and IMO, C650GT is better in every way. Better handling, better suspension, better breaks, better transmission (BTW: C650GT has chain, not belt so don't worry about replacement any time soon).
Also, I have owned many BMW motorcycles, and my last bike was 12 R1200RT and C650GT handles better! In fact, it is the best handling bike I have ever owned and I have owned many many bikes!
One must own one of these to really appreciate it. A short test drive won't do.
By the way, are you sure you didn't buy the Burgman because of the price? :)
I know they give big discounts on the Burgman but none on the C650Gt.
Agree totally. The naming confusion gets difficult to explain even to other motorcycling buddies, one or two of whom are German and fond of BMWs. As you are likely aware the F800GS ADV now makes the naming suggestion somewhat more redundant. I guess if BMW had named the F650GS twin as the F700GS from the outset, it'd likely be less complicated when factoring in the G650GS single. Naturally though, the marketing dept should have foreseen this confusion from the outset and instead have decided on some other letter of the English alphabet, since using the letter F was one hell of a F-up