2013 Honda CBR500R and CB500F

Discussion in 'Road Warriors' started by cabanza, Sep 13, 2012.

  1. frog13

    frog13 Long timer

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,523
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    No mention of unhappy?...just seemed 50 hp for the 500 was a bit high.
  2. scooterspirit

    scooterspirit maxi-pad

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Oddometer:
    806
    Location:
    Zombivillibtardistan
    I see what you mean. I expect it's still a real fine bike and the cx too, I didn't mean to put it down.

    This Thia product, coming out of these new Honda factories is just incredible. The 500s look good, I probably won't get one, to me it just doesn't scream- I love kitty! :wink:
  3. opticalmace

    opticalmace Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Oddometer:
    165
    Location:
    SW Ontario
    Any performance info yet? 0-60, 1/4 mile?
  4. Cortez

    Cortez BAZINGA!

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Oddometer:
    7,208
    Location:
    Croatia
    0-60 (62 actually) on the NC700X is in the 6,5s ballpark, so with same power
    and less weight, I'm assuming 5,5-6 seconds.

    Pegaso has 48hp but about 40lbs less then the 500s, and it'll do 62 mph
    in exactly 5 seconds.
  5. opticalmace

    opticalmace Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Oddometer:
    165
    Location:
    SW Ontario
    Wonder how these would be as an upgrade from a Ninja 250R...
  6. scooterspirit

    scooterspirit maxi-pad

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Oddometer:
    806
    Location:
    Zombivillibtardistan
    sounds like you are saying the 500 is a lot faster than the 700 0-62. Over in the NC folder they said its time was 4.9 sec, here they say the 500 is 5 secs, about the same.

    You've ridden the 700 some, do you think the 500 will feel faster around town? The 700 seems like it would have more grunt on the highway.

    For what I do, pooting around town and country, the 250 gives me everything the 500 could.
  7. The Killstar

    The Killstar Ted Simon Acolyte

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Oddometer:
    320
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    That's exactly the struggle I'm having. For a starter bike, considering the cost difference, I don't know if the 500 is worth it.

    That being said, if I could afford a 500 with no stipulations, I would have it. I really think its a great bike, and if I didn't have a super dependable bike right now, I would go for the 500 no problem.
  8. dduelin

    dduelin Be Thou My Vision, Oh Lord Of My Heart

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Oddometer:
    2,241
    Location:
    Shaft City
    The NC700X manual 0-60 mph just a tick under 5 seconds.

    http://www.cycleworld.com/2012/10/18/honda-nc700x-road-test/3/

    Folks buy horsepower but usually end up riding torque and the 670cc motor has 38% more of it. [+/- 32 ft/lbs vs 44] The 500s and the 700 will be close in 0-60 acceleration test numbers but in the type of riding done everyday we rarely twist it redline every gear and it helps to have a plump midrange where we normally operate the motor.
  9. Cortez

    Cortez BAZINGA!

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Oddometer:
    7,208
    Location:
    Croatia
    I've seen those number and I doubt them (for the 700).
    A LOT faster for the 500? No, but it's lighter, it should be a bit faster.

    The 700X feels faster around town then my 100hp FZ6, the 500 hass
    less torque and needs more revs to move, there's no way it'll feel faster
    then the 700 in normal riding conditions.

    The 700X off the idle is like a 1000cc inline4 and at small throttle openings.
  10. Cortez

    Cortez BAZINGA!

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Oddometer:
    7,208
    Location:
    Croatia
    +1 (but again, I doubt the 5 second 0-60 time..)
  11. sendler

    sendler Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Oddometer:
    860
    Location:
    Syracuse, NY USA
    For canyon racing the Ninja250 is pretty quick due to it's light weight. For long distance travel or commuting or for tall people that need more leg room, The CBR500R will be much smoother, roomier and more solid in rain and wind.
  12. Auto-X Fil

    Auto-X Fil Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Oddometer:
    879
    Location:
    Montrose, PA.
    I'm really looking for an F or X, but I'm going to test ride an R next week (because it's available). I'll report back!
  13. YJake

    YJake Wrenchin'

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,318
    Location:
    West Panhandle, FL
    I was hoping to see more pictures in this thread but I guess nobody on her is buying these bikes huh? :lol3

    -Jake
  14. rnewb

    rnewb n00b

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2013
    Oddometer:
    3
    Location:
    Roswell, GA
    I can post some pics tomorrow. I have a tricolor 500R. Anything in particular you'd like me to focus on?
  15. Flightar

    Flightar Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Oddometer:
    154
    Location:
    Sebastian, FL.
    Its a great upgrade to the Ninja 250...my room mate had a 2011 250, and now has a CB 500F. So, I have ridden them both extensively. If you have a 250 then everything you like about it you'll love about the CB. The CB even has mostly the same engine charcteristics. You just get more smoothness, more power, more room, and the option of hard luggage depending on which model CB you want.
  16. Inzane123

    Inzane123 Adventurer

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Oddometer:
    65
    Location:
    Walking in Memphis
    Here is one from yesterdays ride.

    [​IMG]
  17. YJake

    YJake Wrenchin'

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,318
    Location:
    West Panhandle, FL
    Nice!

    I'm contemplating replacing my Ninja 250 with one of these CB500s or an NC700x for an "Around Town" and short trip bike. I have a liter bike for back road hooliganism and road trips already. I'm just not sure I'm gaining enough with the purchase of the CB or NC to justify buying one :deal

    -Jake
  18. Auto-X Fil

    Auto-X Fil Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Oddometer:
    879
    Location:
    Montrose, PA.
    I took a quick test ride on a CBR500R today.

    It looks like a sport bike, it smells like a sport bike, but it's not a sport bike. Not even a little bit.

    The position is high, very "standard". The pegs are pretty high and back, more agressive than the bars, but still not like a RR. I wasn't a huge fan of the pull-back angle of the CRB500R bars, but they are clip-ons so that's easily remedied. They seemed too aggressive for the high position. My knees fit very nicely in the tank depressions, and it's a generally comfy, full-sized position for my 6' frame.

    The power is amazingly linear. People looking for excitement will call it "flat", but it pulls pretty eagerly all the way up. It is very smooth, very quiet, and very grown-up. It's certainly not a 250: overtaking and freeway cruising happen without wringing the snot out of it. They happen faster if you do. The torque down low lets it pull from 3k or less, although I wouldn't say it pulls eagerly. At no point is there anything like a rush of power or a lightness of the front wheel, which can be a good or bad thing.

    In any case, the naked look certainly matches the character of the bike, and I feel that the CBR version is a bit of a sheep in wolf's clothing. I'll be looking at the F, although that's obviously just my personal take on the aesthetics.

    It's a really nice bike that drops neatly between the 250/300 class, and the various 650 thumpers and twins. I'm not positive that I'll prefer this over a 650GS thumper, but the fact that the BMW is the same price used as the Honda is new certainly sways things a bit.

    [​IMG]
  19. yooperbikemike

    yooperbikemike high, wide and handsome

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Oddometer:
    13,350
    Location:
    The blue groove
    <article>Honda CBR500R | Price: $5999 ($6499 w/ABS)

    Engine type: l-c parallel-twin
    Valve train: DOHC, 8v
    Displacement: 471cc
    Bore x stroke: 67.0 x 66.8mm
    Compression: 10.7:1
    Fuel system: EFI
    Clutch: Wet, multi-plate
    Transmission: 6-speed
    Measured horsepower: 44.5 bhp @ 8700 rpm
    Measured torque: 28.9 lb.-ft. @ 7000 rpm
    Corrected 1&#8260;4-mile: 13.63 sec. @ 93.80 mph
    Top-gear roll-on, 60-80 mph: 8.26 sec.
    Frame: Steel semi-double-cradle
    Front suspension: Showa 41mm fork
    Rear suspension: Showa shock with adjustable spring preload
    Front brake: Nissin two-piston caliper, 320mm disc, optional ABS
    Rear brake: Nissin one-piston caliper, 240mm disc, optional ABS
    Front tire: 120/70ZR-17 Dunlop D222F
    Rear tire: 160/60ZR-17 Dunlop D222
    Rake/trail: 25.5°/4.1 in.
    Seat height: 30.9 in.
    Wheelbase: 55.5 in.
    Fuel capacity: 4.1 gal.
    Weight (tank full/empty): 430/405 lbs. (ABS model)
    Fuel mileage (hi/low/avg.): 61/43/53 mpg
    Colors: Black, Pearl White/Blue/Red, Red
    </article>
  20. sendler

    sendler Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Oddometer:
    860
    Location:
    Syracuse, NY USA
    There are some good numbers starting to come in for the CBR500R on Fuelly.
    .
    .
    [​IMG]
    .
    .
    I thought the new Ninja300 would be a little higher than this.
    .
    .
    [​IMG]
    .
    .