2013 KTM Adventure 1190

Discussion in 'Ridiculous streetbikes with 6 CPUs and too much HP' started by goodcat8, Apr 23, 2012.

  1. LukasM

    LukasM Long timer

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Oddometer:
    5,457
    Location:
    On a RTW ride - currently touring the U.S.
    Why do you guys keep recommending bikes if you have not even ridden them? It's pretty obvious that you have never taken a 690 on the highway or we wouldn't be having this discussion.

    The 690 is pretty light and makes a lot of power for a single but it is nowhere near as smooth as a twin could be (neither the 654 nor the 690cc version), and with the close ratio 6-speed you either gear it to work well off road OR the highway, you can't have both. I also trust my Husaberg more than I would trust a 690 so I see no reason to carry the extra 60 lbs.

    I enjoy performance and light weight so I'm not interested in a DR, been there, done that (including a full KTM suspension swap).
  2. cyborg

    cyborg Potius Sero Quam Numquam

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Oddometer:
    5,414
    Location:
    Pacific NorthWet
    Having recently spent 6 days on a borrowed KTM690 equally offroad in dirt and long pavement sections, with GL luggage, I agree with Lukas. After just 3-4 hours of highway speed pavement on a comfy Renazco seat the vibes eventually made me glad to get off of it, and I ride almost every day, all year, so very used to motorcycle seat time. My current KTM990, my former Aprilia RXV550, and even my Husaberg FE390 are all MUCH smoother at higher speeds than the KTM690. The 690 is fun in the dirt for a bigger bike, and when bashing around in the dirt you are up and moving a lot so the vibes aren't felt as much -- but the sit-down sessions a true Adventure bike will need to do just aren't all that comfortable on it.

    Small v-twins rock and a small smooth reliable twin in the nice handling 690 frame sub 350lb as discussed earlier I think would be the magic carpet ride the hard-core here seek. I love the Triumph triples too and the Tiger XC800 was supposed to be Triumphs long awaited lighter Tiger (we hoped they would have kept it a lighter 675 triple), but instead they made it a pig, almost as heavy as my old Triumph Tiger 955i, big disappointment. I guess the market size for those of us who DO want to ride these things EVERYWHERE, including single trail, is too small a demographic for the big manufacturers.

    I'm with many here in hoping the 1190 sells well and KTM does well enough to perhaps dabble in smaller Real Adventure bikes.
  3. Newbusa

    Newbusa Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Oddometer:
    749
    Location:
    Qualicum Beach
    It seems our local dealer here on Vancouver island is now advertising for sale the 1190 for 2013[​IMG]
  4. randel

    randel Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2006
    Oddometer:
    367
    Location:
    Mattighofen
    I see KTM's choice to increase new Adventure displacement to 1190cc very logical - all other bike manufacturers are making1200cc bikes - BMW, Triumph, Yamaha. It's hard to compete with 990cc bike in 1200cc class and attract new customers.
    I see KTM 690 competing more with other 1-cylinder bikes like BMW Sertao and Yamaha Tenere.
    That leaves new 800cc multi-cylinder Adventure bike class (F800GS, Tiger 800) somewhere inbetween - it would make a lot of sense for KTM to come up with new bike to compete with BMW and Triumph. I would expect ca 100hp (like original 950) and 170-180kg (sub 400lbs) wet weight. Let's hope for the best!
  5. O.C.F.RIDER

    O.C.F.RIDER Loose nut behind h/bars

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Oddometer:
    4,985
    Location:
    Hewitt,New Jerseystan, OBAMANATION
    If you really don't get it, many people would gladly trade some of those horses for a lighter bike that will handle better off road, use less fuel, be easier to pick up, etc. There is no replacement for displacement when you are going in a straight line, but for turning, jumping and braking I couldn't give a shit whether I had 20-30 horses less if it could loose 100 lbs.[/QUOTE]
    Nobody seems to realize that, for what the 950 is (or was), it ain't that porky. You can't compare it to anything else, because it's in a class of one.

    The new beast.......................:puke2
  6. triplenickel

    triplenickel Long timer

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Oddometer:
    2,503
    Location:
    Campbell River, BC. Fantasy Island
    Nobody seems to realize that, for what the 950 is (or was), it ain't that porky. You can't compare it to anything else, because it's in a class of one.

    The new beast.......................:puke2
    [/QUOTE]

    I'm really not sure where some people (not you obviously) would expect the savings to come from with an 800 if all else was equal or close to equal with the 9X0's. You want slightly less HP, but with suspension and fuel capacity it's gonna make it end up damn close to the same. Just compare the 9x0 to the current crop of less suspended, less powerful 800 offerings from the competition, they aren't very far apart and with the common mods like exhaust get even closer. We all agree the HP is a big part of what makes the 9X0's so much fun and so good on the boring bits and we want to take that away for a few kg's? No thanks.
  7. LukasM

    LukasM Long timer

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Oddometer:
    5,457
    Location:
    On a RTW ride - currently touring the U.S.
    "Not that porky" does not mean that it could not be made lighter, does it? Luckily there have been 10 years since the introduction of the 950 with no revolutionary design changes since, and technology has moved on.


    Really? Come on guys, it's not rocket science....

    The weight difference between a 690 and a 990 (non ABS!) is around 140 lbs, with the engines accounting for around 40 lbs of that. Considering the smaller displacement and that manufacturing technologies have improved, a die cast 700-800cc twin engine should be at least 10 lbs lighter than the 990, probably more.

    So you've got around 110 lbs difference after the engine, you don't think you can beef up a 690 chassis enough to deal with 80-90 horses and add a fairing and be left over with a significant portion of that? The 450RR rear tank that bolts to the 690 chassis is available already and weighs maybe 1 lb more, and with it's 18 liters of fuel will give you better range than a 990 has.

    And don't forget that the 690 already has 48mm forks, 21"/18" wheels with Dirt Star rims, the same brakes as the 950SE and that the 690 rally replicas and even the factory LC4 rally bikes (some sporting a >80HP 730cc engine) run through the desert at up to 200 km/h for two weeks during the Dakar using that same trellis frame and I have never heard of anybody having problems, have you?

    I think with some modern and creative engineering a 80-90 HP 700-800cc twin with 360-380lbs (wet no fuel) is a realistic goal, and I'd buy one tomorrow.
  8. bikepharmer

    bikepharmer Baja is on the way

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Oddometer:
    172
    It is true, I've never ridden a 690, but I have owned and ridden a KLR and DR, and now own a 990.

    So, you want KTM to build a 750/800 cc twin, similar to the Tiger/BMW F800GS, but you want it to weigh 350 lbs, be suitable for highway purposes, and handle like an MX bike off-road. Plus, you want it to be reasonably priced and strong. Damn, that is a pretty tall order for any maker. They would need to shave 200-ish cc's off the 990, and find a way to lose 80-100 lbs. That means tiny tank, skinny seat, and little or no wind protection.

    I think you have a better chance of riding a unicorn:jack:jack

    All in fun, mate. We all have our wish list, but I've yet to see a single bike fit everyone needs absolutely perfectly. There are always compromises.
  9. bikepharmer

    bikepharmer Baja is on the way

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Oddometer:
    172
    Any updates? It has been pulled from the US website, and other than some reports from inmates talking to US dealers (who don't seem to have a lot of reliable information), there has been no mention of it hitting US soil any time soon.

    This bike has a lot of appeal for me....I find myself pounding more pavement miles and gravel/forest road as a percentage of ride time, so for me this bike makes a lot of sense. I don't mind lubing chains, and I'm severely allergic to FD failures, so for me it seems like a strong option.
  10. LukasM

    LukasM Long timer

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Oddometer:
    5,457
    Location:
    On a RTW ride - currently touring the U.S.
    You should catch up on the thread before posting your reply, I've demonstrated the math.

    690 weighs 312 lbs, tell me what is unrealistic about adding another cylinder and making everything a bit more heavy duty if you've got an extra 50-60 lbs to play with as I have outlined?
  11. LukasM

    LukasM Long timer

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Oddometer:
    5,457
    Location:
    On a RTW ride - currently touring the U.S.
  12. TIGERRIDER007

    TIGERRIDER007 North GA RAT

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,411
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    Same here bikepharmer...on the asphalt pounding and wanting to know if it's coming stateside.
    If it is not, I need to know, then I can make plans to buy a Tenere, white one please. Should I keep saving dough in hopes of buying or get the news and start riding a bike that's available?
    So, I'm going to see if anyone at the motorcycle show this coming weekend, here in Atlanta, can answer the question, is it coming or not?
    :ear
  13. wizze

    wizze Wizze = Wise

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,285
    Location:
    Jet City WA
    Talked to local KTM dealer on Saturday. They have little info but they are getting lots of calls. He believed they might not show up til 2014 either because of production or letting the Euros work out the bugs. The dealer meeting is in a few weeks and he should know more then. Til then it's all speculation.
  14. Gregster

    Gregster Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Oddometer:
    995
    Location:
    New Brunswick, Canada
    We often don't get the cool bikes in North America because of all the moaning about unicorns. I think the Europeans must think we're a very weird bunch.
  15. Bob599

    Bob599 Bob599

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Oddometer:
    288
    Location:
    The land of Beer and Cheese (Hartland WI)
    I spoke to Southeast Sales in Milwaukee. They said they are flying over for a demo ride for US dealers in June and the bikes will start showing up in August.
  16. WestVirginia

    WestVirginia Well spoke'n

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2012
    Oddometer:
    84
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV
    Inmate rumors are you can get a 2012 Tenere for $11,500 plus TT&L here around WV and Ohio.

    I am glad KTM is making an 1190. We (all riders) need more competition in every size to drive innovation. The Honda NC700X, for example, at $6,999 is a breath of fresh air.

    It seems from the photos that KTM has made a more user-friendly bike (yes, I want a fuel gauge) that will be tough as nails. KTM can charge BMW prices for it, but only as long as it is reliable with low maintenance.

    Hec, the bottom line is I hope everybody just buys a bike and rides.
  17. cyborg

    cyborg Potius Sero Quam Numquam

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Oddometer:
    5,414
    Location:
    Pacific NorthWet
    They probably don't whine about the lighter dirt machines because for many of the Euro's they don't have any large sections of public land and thousands of miles of dirt/mud/sand that we North Americano's enjoy. They have to travel South to Africa for some of that fun stuff, a major undertaking for many.
  18. TIGERRIDER007

    TIGERRIDER007 North GA RAT

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,411
    Location:
    Acworth, GA
    Well alrighty then!!! So I must exercise patience for a wee bit longer, now what's this $1000 service number all about? :huh
  19. Scutty

    Scutty Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    388
    Location:
    Sunny Surrey, UK
    Here's a simple question........given the list below showing 800cc+ Adventure motorcycle sales in Italy (Year to date) can anyone guess why KTM are releasing an 1190 Adventure???

    Adventure Bikes (800cc +):

    1. R1200GS/A - 3200
    2. MTS 1200 - 1209
    3. F800GS - 978
    4. Tiger 800/XC - 909
    5. CrossTourer - 728
    6. Versys 1000 - 281
    7. Stelvio 1200 - 241
    8. KTM 990 Adventure - 197
    9. KTM 990 SMT - 195
    10. 1200 Explorer - 194

    Anyone?

    Anyone?


    Buller?



    Buller?
  20. Podman

    Podman Rocketman

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Oddometer:
    286
    Location:
    Dublin, Ohio
    Yeah but releasing them in August! Let's see April= 0, May=0, June still zero, July=0, August - Oh too late bought something else.:evil:rofl