2015 Mustang!

Discussion in 'Shiny Things' started by DomEOD, Dec 4, 2013.

  1. Tripped1

    Tripped1 Likely Lost.

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Oddometer:
    8,229
    Location:
    Nippon
    Or you can get fancy and for 45 get a Boss.....which was built (successfully) as an M3 killer.

    You get a faster car that CAN handle for about 35 large less.......not to mention I think that car has the best stock exhaust sound that I have ever heard.
  2. DomEOD

    DomEOD 'murica

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2013
    Oddometer:
    2,469
    Location:
    Ft Carson, CO and SoCal
    You can maybe find a leftover new Boss, but it'd way easier to get a used one for cheaper. They are such ass kicking cars on the track and street!

    Broadcasting from a Mexican radio.
  3. NDEBT

    NDEBT Long timer

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Oddometer:
    5,292
    Location:
    Poteau Oklahoma
    To get good power from tubos you need cool air. That is why the nose of these cars get bigger. I think Ford did a good job of making a "scoop" look cool and work with the body.
  4. mflora98ss

    mflora98ss Dual Sportin'

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Oddometer:
    683
    Location:
    Van Etten, NY
    Only people that like to lose an ass load of money buy new cars. I meant used. New, you are right. The Mustangs are great bang for your buck, just not my buck.

    I think you've had enough whiskey if your comparing the Mustang to a Corvette on a road coarse.
  5. Mulepick

    Mulepick Adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Oddometer:
    19
    My '13 GT/CS is this 55+ dude's daily driver. The garage is full of bikes that get eye-fucked and an 06 F-250 PSD that sits outside neither gitting driven much or eye-fucked (but stands ready to hump the camper). I get 18 in the summer and 19 in the winter with the Coyote 5.0.
  6. Bueller

    Bueller Cashin?

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Oddometer:
    17,385
    Location:
    Hide Away Hills, Ohio
    Depends on what vehicle you are buying. A lightly used Wrangler for example, isn't necessarily a good deal because resale value is so high.

    Beyond that my statement still applies for used vehicles because most Ford models don't have particularly good resale value. For example I bought my Shelby lightly used (11,000 miles), still under warranty, and well below book value at $31k, with mods that increased power by over 20% from the stock 500 hp rating. The original owner had more than $50k in the car. I'd challenge you to find anything else new or used in that price range that offers the combination of power, performance, handling, braking, etc., for that money.

    For a more mainstream view take a look at a 2011 V-6 Mustang. A typical example with 45,000 miles would cost $15k - $20k depending on options. Here is what Car and Driver had to say about the straight line performance:

    Strapped with our test gear, we spurred a new V-6 Mustang with the standard six-speed manual to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 14 flat at 104 mph. That’s over one second better in both tests than the previous V-6 model and just a half-second or so off the paces of the quickest 2010 GT we tested. More important, the 3520-pound Mustang V-6 is 0.5 second quicker than the 3800-pound Chevy Camaro V-6 in both measures—cue the chirping from the peanut gallery—and the Ford also outruns the slightly lighter and more powerful Hyundai Genesis V-6 coupe.

    Here's what they had to say about handling:

    The V-6 may be only 60 pounds lighter than the new GT, but the difference feels greater from the driver’s seat; it’s more nimble and neutral-handling, with a surprising amount of feedback from the electric power-steering rack. Despite the solid-axle layout, our tester’s ride felt compliant and controlled, with little if any uneasiness during hard cornering on rough pavement.

    We’ll say the steering is a bit too light for our liking, and the suspension tuning made for an occasional ass-out surprise during abrupt, high-speed directional changes. But we can’t fault the big-league numbers: a 152-foot stop from 70 mph and a neck-straining 0.95 g around the skidpad, both of which slightly better the 2011 GT’s and approach those of far more expensive stuff. We also didn’t notice any fade from the stock brakes, which should hold up fairly well even if you plan to hit the track regularly. (Did we just suggest frequent track use of a V-6 Mustang? I think we did.)


    http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2011-ford-mustang-v6-short-take-road-test

    14 second 1/4 mile. 5.4 seconds 0-60. Great brakes. .95g on the skid pad. New or used, comparing similar age and mileage - what is out there that provides better bang for the buck? :ear There are other cars out there I'd consider driving in that same price range, but they will either be significantly older and/or not perform as well (for example I'd have to go much older to get a Boxster in that price range, and it wouldn't perform as well).
  7. mflora98ss

    mflora98ss Dual Sportin'

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Oddometer:
    683
    Location:
    Van Etten, NY
    One particular car that I would choose would be a couple year old C6 Corvette that you could get into for the 30k range. If you shop around you might be able to get into a ZO6 for around 35k. You can get a smoking deal on them now that the C7's are out and all those mustache sporting guys are trading in their C6's. Another couple choices would be for a Subaru STI, or a Mitsubishi Lancer EVO just to name a few. You bought your Shelby the right way and got a super deal.
  8. Tripped1

    Tripped1 Likely Lost.

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Oddometer:
    8,229
    Location:
    Nippon
    My ex's 1994 Five-point-slow got 26mph highway, and that was with me driving the piss out of it 11 hours to Indianapolis...I don't think I went much under 90mph unless I was stopping for gas :lol3
  9. Bueller

    Bueller Cashin?

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Oddometer:
    17,385
    Location:
    Hide Away Hills, Ohio
    C6 corvette = slower in a straight line but a little better handling. Kind of a wash.

    I was a Mitsubishi Diamond Pro Master Auto Tech. Made a lot of money on their cars. I don't want to own one because I rebuilt hundreds of their AWD gearboxes, but beyond that the EVO and the STI can be classified the same - competent and quick, but not particularly exciting (as was the case with my WRX, which had a really crappy interior for the money too!) I think the BRZ would be a more entertaining but slower car to drive, but I'll confess to not having driven one. I enjoyed my '00 miata a lot more than I enjoyed the WRX. Of everything you mentioned besides Mustang and Mustang variants the Corvette is the best overall choice, but you still haven't listed anything that provides more bang for the buck than a Mustang, new or used.
  10. BCC

    BCC I know better

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Oddometer:
    8,907
    Location:
    Southern NJ
    Well, I really like the '15's look. I'm adding the GT to the list.
  11. mflora98ss

    mflora98ss Dual Sportin'

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Oddometer:
    683
    Location:
    Van Etten, NY
    I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then if you think a C6 Z06 is not a better choice. There is no doubt that the Mustang is great bang for your buck, I would rather spend my buck elsewhere on a C6 ZO6. Now I can't say that I have driven the current Mustang in question, But I have driven a few ZO6's and can say that this car is very tough to beat in the straight line and in handling, even an old 2002 385 horse ZO6 flat out hauls ass, and tears up the twisties. I would have to disagree with you on the WRX not being exciting. I've given many a hater rides in my 02 bug eye WRX on the seasonal snow covered roads around these parts and made them all believers.
  12. Bueller

    Bueller Cashin?

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Oddometer:
    17,385
    Location:
    Hide Away Hills, Ohio
    I'm not saying a C6 Z06 isn't a better choice. I'm saying it doesn't provide more bang for the buck than a Mustang, because it costs more than a Mustang!

    A WRX is exciting in the snow, but on dry pavement it is not an exciting car to drive compared to either a Mustang or a Vette.
  13. DomEOD

    DomEOD 'murica

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2013
    Oddometer:
    2,469
    Location:
    Ft Carson, CO and SoCal

    That. They're a blast in the snow and dirt, but on the street and track mine did not do it for me.
  14. rocker59

    rocker59 diplomatico di moto

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    Oddometer:
    16,210
    Location:
    The Trans-Mississippi


    No mention of comparing a Mustang and a Corvette in the above exchange. :dunno
  15. jmlmjmjm

    jmlmjmjm Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Oddometer:
    941
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    mflora is using "Fusion" instead of Mustang in the above exchange....his way of belittling the Mustang.
  16. ScottDill

    ScottDill TANSTAAFL

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Oddometer:
    4,441
    Location:
    Ontario
    Is it even the same platform? Mustang is RWD.
  17. Tripped1

    Tripped1 Likely Lost.

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Oddometer:
    8,229
    Location:
    Nippon
    Not even close. :lol3
  18. TooFast

    TooFast Long timer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Oddometer:
    1,370
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    I wonder how much longer the new Camaro and Challenger will be in production? Well equipped hipo V8 versions are a bit pricy....last SRT and SS I looked at was ~$50K - pretty much new Vette territory
  19. ShadyRascal

    ShadyRascal Master of None

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Oddometer:
    6,957
    Location:
    the Root, Western Montana
    Strapped with our test gear, we spurred a new V-6 Mustang with the standard six-speed manual to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 14 flat at 104 mph. That’s over one second better in both tests than the previous V-6 model and just a half-second or so off the paces of the quickest 2010 GT we tested. More important, the 3520-pound Mustang V-6 is 0.5 second quicker than the 3800-pound Chevy Camaro V-6 in both measures—cue the chirping from the peanut gallery—and the Ford also outruns the slightly lighter and more powerful Hyundai Genesis V-6 coupe.



    Hey, if this new Mustang is really a couple hundred pounds lighter than the current version, and the V-6 has the same or even more power, a V-6 2015 will be some kinda car at a budget price.
  20. spagthorpe

    spagthorpe Long timer

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Oddometer:
    14,791
    Location:
    San Diego
    I saw on a lot tonight, new 2014 V6 Mustangs going for $17K and change. That's about the cost of a Kia Soul? Too bad Ford didn't come out with a track package like they do on the GTs. I guess an enthusiast has a lot of other routes to work on suspension and brakes, but it's always a bargain from the factory.