BMW G650XChallenge FRONT SUSPENSION

Discussion in 'Thumpers' started by lkongo, Oct 21, 2007.

  1. lkongo

    lkongo Roxen rider

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    90
    Location:
    Linköping, SWEDEN
    Hi!

    My impression of the bikes front suspension is that it's hard at stock setting. One advice I got was "soften the compresion an increase rebound"

    I soften the Compression and increased Rebound with a very bad result. The bike felt very unstable.

    I'm not experienced with either riding nor suspension settings so after that I have read as much info I've found about suspension settings.

    One rule of thumb I have found is to set the rebound first to avoid thinking that the compression is wrong.

    I have finally got the suspension feeling better on my XChallenge and here are my conclusions this far:

    -The stock Rebound is high on this bike.
    -The spring is probably made for a rider that is heavier than my 72kg.

    My present setting (still slowly decreasing the settings) is:
    C= -4 from stock
    R= -5 from stock

    My free sag is 35mm which is on the high side of recommended (that's why I belive the spring is maybe a little stiff to my weight)

    Race sag is 53-55mm which is somewhere around the recomendations I've read.

    Mostly I use approx 50% of the travel and accasionally 70%. I'm not an aggressive rider though so it may go deeper if i would do a hard landing. It's difficult to see how much is used but I can fel the oil film to 190mm and clearly see it at half of the travel.

    I will keep trying to improve the setting because it really makes a difference in both comfort and control.

    I'm very interested in YOUR weight/skill level/setting and opinion about the front !!
    #1
  2. lkongo

    lkongo Roxen rider

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    90
    Location:
    Linköping, SWEDEN
    I asked the Swedish BMW Tech. manager about the suspension and he said that the bikes suspension is made for a rider weighing 75kg.

    Surprising in my opinion...

    He also said that Öhlins has other springs for the fork.
    #2
  3. shardzero

    shardzero I have a bike.....

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Oddometer:
    486
    Location:
    Perth
    I have done ramp to flat landings and use stock settings. Bike feels stable on 'pea' gravel, especially good on sand, good feed back on 'whoops'. The stock setting is probably firm but I think thats because the bike was designed for a reasonable amount of abuse. For road going softness maybe the country has better setups available. I am 69 kg and ride with 110 psi in the rear. That is hard, but I find the rear responds very nicely for me at this pressure. It probably is not useful to talk clicks and 'feel', as unless your riding the same substrate, are the same weight and similarly aggresive/placid your going to run into issues of relativity.

    If your trying to smooth out minor roughness decrease the tyre pressure to low 20's high teens, depending on substrate and riding style/speed.
    #3
  4. lkongo

    lkongo Roxen rider

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    90
    Location:
    Linköping, SWEDEN
    Good input, thanks!

    When you say it's specially good for sand confirms that the front has a high rebound damping??

    I also think it works very well i sand/whoops to when it works relatively slow.

    On harder conditions where it has to work very fast (series of small holes for example) it doesn't work that good.

    I have softened C to -6 and R still at -5 and I think this is the best setting for me so far.

    I run the back at 90psi cold which is 105-110psi warm. Works good.
    #4
  5. Max Kool

    Max Kool Xtankteam™

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Oddometer:
    3,240
    Location:
    Los Angeles

    I have exactly the same experience. I weigh around 100kgs and I feel the springs themselves are about right for my weight. I use around 90% of the available suspension travel, never bottoms out. In sand and other soft stuff I like the front, but on stones and rocks the front feels harsh. Riding on a railway bed (or other rocky stuff) is no fun. I have the feeling the low speed damping is quite ok, but the high speed damping is too much. I run the compression 5 clicks softer than stock, and the rebound 3 clicks softer.

    Maybe I need to go down some more on both the compression and rebound?
    #5
  6. lkongo

    lkongo Roxen rider

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    90
    Location:
    Linköping, SWEDEN
    What I got explained to me is that the Rebound controls the energy in the spring.

    The rebound reduces speed both upwards and downwards of the travel, that's why many riders think the Compression is to high when the fork feels hard/harsch. The real problem may be that the rebound limits the speed of which the suspension moves.

    That's why one always should start setting the rebound where it feels the best and then work with the compression.

    I've tried rebound as low as -7 but the front got a little "bumpy" (uncontrolled). -5 is where I have found the best so far.

    Then offcourse a higher compression may need a higher rebound but the specialist I asked said that's mariginal.

    Why not try -4/-5 in rebound and stock--/-2 in compression first to see if you where fooled of a to high rebound.

    As I mentioned earlier I'm a beginner but what the specialist, I got advice from, said is very logical in my opinion.

    Here is the guy I got some advice by mail from:

    http://www.brucessuspension.com/kb4.htm
    #6
  7. Sonymalc

    Sonymalc I'm Just Here

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Oddometer:
    441
    Location:
    Sparks NV
    My current front settigns are -4 on compression and +2 on rebound. So far the front feels good but I am still experminting with it.
    #7
  8. GB

    GB . Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Oddometer:
    57,302
    Location:
    Toronto
    It'll be nice to be able to dial in my front suspension at long last..... when I get my X-C.. :thumb

    :lurk
    #8
  9. Dirt Hugger

    Dirt Hugger Urban Adventurer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Oddometer:
    65
    Location:
    Pretoria, South Africa
    Just a question about setting up the XChallenge for road use (some commuting during the week) :norton

    I weigh just under 100kg with full kit, currently have the back at 110psi cold, which seems correct according to the all-knowing bubble, rebound at "comfort"...

    Have the front compression at max minus 5 clicks, and rebound at max minus 5 clicks (quite a hard setup as was suggested by the dealer)

    The bike feels OK at speeds under 110 km/h on the tarmac, but I can detect the beginning of a headshake when going faster than this. :eek1 Tyre pressure is 1.9 front, 2.2 back, stock Metzeler Saharas.

    What have you guys found to be a good road setup, especially the guys tipping the scales at about 100kg's?
    #9
  10. Max Kool

    Max Kool Xtankteam™

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Oddometer:
    3,240
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I haven't ridden the stock Sahara's, but I do know the Xchallenge is very sucseptible to its tires. Especially the rear one. When I bought mine it had Michelin Enduro III and IV tires and at 22 psi it would shake its head at anything above 70 mph.

    I changed the rear for a Michelin Baja and it was gone. Completely.
    #10
  11. GB

    GB . Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Oddometer:
    57,302
    Location:
    Toronto
    I've ridden the bike in stock form, stock tires at 150 km/h without the slightest hint of any shake or shimmy or anything else.. awesome ride!
    #11
  12. lkongo

    lkongo Roxen rider

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    90
    Location:
    Linköping, SWEDEN
    +1

    I have taken my X to 180km/h on the display (maybe 165-170 in reality??) with the wind from behind and no headshake. Tyres: Pirelli MT21.
    #12
  13. Dirt Hugger

    Dirt Hugger Urban Adventurer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Oddometer:
    65
    Location:
    Pretoria, South Africa
    During the past few weeks I have experimented with the pressure of the rear shock. It seems to have quite an influence on the headshake/nervous handling above 110 km/h I had previously mentioned.

    Seems like when the rear is pumped too hard, the nervousness is more pronounced. When setting the rear sag to 90-100mm (cold) no headshake or unstable behaviour (this translates to about 105psi in the shock). I have also reverted to the default front fork compression and rebound settings.

    My conclusion is that a overly hard rear shock increases the steering angle up to a point where the handling becomes quite nervous on tarmac at highway speeds, which makes sense...

    Ah, the joys of getting to know the personality of a new steed... :lol3
    #13
  14. Metteke

    Metteke Beemer beat in me

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Oddometer:
    209
    Location:
    Flanders Fields
    I had my level bubble replaced under warranty (since the original one was placed wrong), and what I notice now is that according to the new setup of the bubble, I had to let air out the rear! And yes, for me, it is really better. We have a lot of nasty small deep holes because of tractors and farmers cuttings and stuff, and it takes them super-soft. Like they are not there!:clap
    Ok, I do not jump, nor do I ride on an MX-like track... But for me, it works.
    Suspension in the front is way up soft, something like Ikongo's setting (R -5, compression -5 I think) Works well for me and my riding... (smooth, not aggressive and fast flat drifting, no big jumps)


    #14
  15. johan

    johan Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Oddometer:
    249
    Location:
    Mjölby, Sweden
    Anyone had any progress on the whole front suspension debacle on the X? Compresses way too much on breaking, and harsh on fast movements (e.g fast riding on bad gravel and rocky roads)

    Is there some holy grail to fix this (I don't mind sending it for service etc)? I love the bike, but this bit annoys me
    #15
  16. Oni

    Oni Ronin

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,839
    Location:
    Pasadena - Californistan
    Check out Gaspipes thread in the X Challenge index. Marzocchi Shivers fit with some mods.
    #16
  17. johan

    johan Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Oddometer:
    249
    Location:
    Mjölby, Sweden
    Hmm, slightly beyond my budget I think...
    #17
  18. Dagwood_55

    Dagwood_55 Long timer

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,356
    Location:
    The Ozarks
    Hate to sound dumb, but when you guys say -5, and -5 settings: Do you mean 5 clicks to the - (counterclockwise) from the stock settings?? and the same on the other fork?? I weigh 190lbs and want them soft as I don't ride hard or jump.

    If this is not correct, what does it mean??
    #18
  19. FlyingFinn

    FlyingFinn Long timer

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Oddometer:
    1,127
    Location:
    Los Gatos, CA
    Yes. Yes.

    That's correct.

    --
    Mikko
    #19
  20. gsd4me

    gsd4me 90% bluff

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Oddometer:
    7,678
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Exactly what are the stock setting? I bought my bike second hand, and I`m guessing things had been played with.
    #20