College Football 2014

Discussion in 'Sports' started by Hoots Magoon, Jan 6, 2014.

  1. Albie

    Albie Kool Aid poisoner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Oddometer:
    10,206
    Location:
    NWA
    Nice, another piece of the pie for the mob!
  2. Bubwheat

    Bubwheat Long timer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,622
    Season's over, we gotta keep the thread going!
  3. Hoots Magoon

    Hoots Magoon Hey ya'll, Watch this!

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,258
    Location:
    Redneck in New England
    Abuse of kids, you have got to be kidding me. Most of these players wouldn't step foot on a campus if it were not for sports. $30,000 for school and another $20,000 for room and board and other benefits, for playing a game, is more than enough compensation. Abusive my ass, everyone of these young adults lives a pampered life compared to the corporate world, where if the employee doesn't perform, that employee is cut from the team. It should be no different in any sport at any competitive level (not included is t-ball and pee-wee football and the like).

    Players released from scholarship can apply to the NCAA to have the 1 year ban from playing removed when transferring to another school. Most schools will help the departing student apply for the pardon if he/she is transferring to an out of conference and/or out of state school.
  4. Bubwheat

    Bubwheat Long timer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,622
    Here's a good article that explains a few thing about scholarships, grants in aid, and gives you a good idea of what's going on. To tell you the truth, after reading the article, I'm more in favor of a players unions than I was before reading it. :huh

    "The Most Evil Thing about College Sports"

    http://www.slate.com/articles/sport...be_yanked_after_one_year_for_any_reason_.html

    Athletic scholarships are no guarantee of a four-year education. They can be yanked after one year, for any reason
  5. wxwax

    wxwax Excited Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Oddometer:
    82,690
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Pray tell, what's the value of one or two years of this unbelievable deal, if they're then cut?

    The fact that they have to do anything to overcome the one-year ban is obscene. You seem to recognize that.

    The truest thing you wrote is that most of these kids don't belong on a college campus. You're right. But admitting that does sort of undercut what you claim about the value of their education.

    They're not students and the school's not there to turn them into educated men. They're there for football.

    That's why I hope this union thing gets traction.
  6. Hoots Magoon

    Hoots Magoon Hey ya'll, Watch this!

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,258
    Location:
    Redneck in New England
    The value is they have a chance. Many people would give their right leg for that chance, but then they would lose their scholly since they only have one leg.:evil

    They also can step down to Div 1AA or Div 2 or 3, and not lose a year if they are good enough to make those teams. A link from a few years ago


    If a player transfers to the same conference, within the same state, or a team that is on the next years schedule, then I agree with the ban, unless the school agrees to the instate/in-conference transfer. If a FSU player wanted off the team or lost his scholarship, then he would be able to play at LSU but not FAU(unless FSU OKed the move to FAU).


    Or they cannot afford Division I schools.


    I disagree. 99% of these players are not going to make it into the professional leagues. The schools are giving them an opportunity not just football but in all sports. Football is just the most profitable right now and allowing these schools to afford more programs. How do we compensate evenly with other sports, Title IX.

    By allowing players to be paid, Schools like Texas, Auburn :puke1, & Notre Dame (where no expenses are spared) would pay top wages for 5 star recruits, leaving the directional schools with what is left.
  7. wxwax

    wxwax Excited Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Oddometer:
    82,690
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    So you're OK with a school signing a kid, cutting him and denying him the chance to play anywhere he wants?

    That's abusive. Someday it will be illegal.

    It's obvious to all that these guys are, mostly, not students, not college material. They are unpaid employees whose work is used to fund athletic departments and, through alumni fundraising, universities themselves.

    My hope is that the entire hypocritical system is blown up. If that happens, something that both you and I enjoy may be changed forever.

    But at least it will end what is a fundamentally immoral practice.
  8. k7

    k7 Ancien cyclist

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2002
    Oddometer:
    20,120
    Location:
    SOP - south of Phoenix, hotter n hell
    ....from a lower level school is my cousin's kid, Nick Belcher. He just graduated from South Carolina State University and is a kicker.

    He plays in the College Allstar Game on 2/14 in Greenville & then flies to NY the next day for the combines at the NY Jets Facility. Keep him in your thoughts - he's been working his ass off to get ready and he's had some help last summer from a pro kicking coach whose name escapes me. Nick's got a strong leg - 50 yard field goals seem to be pretty easy for him.

    The interesting part is that Nick was adopted - life may have started out rough but the kid is doing just great.
  9. Hoots Magoon

    Hoots Magoon Hey ya'll, Watch this!

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,258
    Location:
    Redneck in New England
    Yes, I am OK with that. It is in the best intrest of all schools to limit where the athletes can go, just like I can't go from Bio-tech to Bio-tech sharing trade secrets.
  10. Jurgen

    Jurgen Trolljegeren Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Oddometer:
    43,541
    Location:
    Sandoval, Nuevo Mexico
    Ahhh, so they are indeed employees, not "student athletes."
  11. Albie

    Albie Kool Aid poisoner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Oddometer:
    10,206
    Location:
    NWA
    NSD is less then a week! :clap
  12. wxwax

    wxwax Excited Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Oddometer:
    82,690
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Yes, I know it's in the best interests of the schools. But it's immoral, abusive and will someday, possibly very soon, be illegal.
  13. ]I)Money

    ]I)Money D NOT I

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2006
    Oddometer:
    3,900
    Location:
    Central central.
    It's in the best interests of a mining company to limit where it's workers can go...


    Look, I DON'T think they are, or should be, full employees, but FFS, simple fairness and common sense ought to dictate that a player should ONLY have to sit out for a year if THEY choose to leave the school. If the school chooses, then they should be able to go to ANY fucking school and play, regardless of division or conference. If you're afraid to play against a kid, DON'T FUCKING CUT THEM.
  14. Jurgen

    Jurgen Trolljegeren Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Oddometer:
    43,541
    Location:
    Sandoval, Nuevo Mexico
    :nod ---
  15. bergermeister

    bergermeister Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Oddometer:
    2,097
    Location:
    CA
    That sounds reasonable. I would maybe add if a team cuts a player for rule violations or illegal activity, rather than simple ability.

    What is the policy for the 1 year of ineligibility if a team cuts a player?
  16. wxwax

    wxwax Excited Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2001
    Oddometer:
    82,690
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    There are variables involved. Some of the cut players will have no restriction, others will have restrictions. The article I read didn't make clear why.
  17. k7

    k7 Ancien cyclist

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2002
    Oddometer:
    20,120
    Location:
    SOP - south of Phoenix, hotter n hell
    There are exceptions to one one-year rule made when a kid leaves the school for a good reason. Jay Prosch was playing at Illinois when his mother was diagnosed with brain cancer. Jay transferred to Auburn and the NCAA waived the one-year rule due to his circumstances.

    A good recap of the story.

    His mother passed away just after Jay played his first game in an Auburn uniform.

    "After playing in Auburn's 2012 season opener against Clemson, Prosch drove straight home to Mobile to be with Iris. She passed away the next morning, and 24 hours later he paid tribute to her by being back in class and practice at Auburn. The following Saturday, he played against Mississippi State."

    Football became his relief mechanism I suppose.
  18. ScottDill

    ScottDill TANSTAAFL

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Oddometer:
    4,464
    Location:
    Ontario
  19. bergermeister

    bergermeister Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Oddometer:
    2,097
    Location:
    CA
  20. Bubwheat

    Bubwheat Long timer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,622