Ducati MultiStrada 1200

Discussion in 'Moto Bellissima: All Other Dualsports' started by Paulvt1, Sep 10, 2008.

  1. Sock Monkey

    Sock Monkey Corporate slave

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,507
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA, USA, Earth
    :topes

    You must have owned a very "special" 12GS. When I was one of the "cool kids" and hung out with other GS owners, we compared notes (and the size of our Starbucks cards :wink: ) and not one of them even RAN at 2k rpm (and by RAN I mean in gear....ANY gear....on level ground with no throttle input, just let it idle), let alone ran "OK". Most were like mine and at best wouldn't shake itself to pieces at 3k rpm, and flat puked and died at 2500 rpm. But what do I know. I only put 20k miles on mine and have put 12k miles on my MTS12.

    Based on direct ownership experience, my MTS12 runs "insanely better" than my 12GS did at 2500rpm because, well, my GS wouldn't run that low. I guess they aren't all the same eh? :deal

    -SM
  2. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,136
    Location:
    Sunny California
    Sorry, but that's complete bullshit. Makes sense that you mark your posts accordingly.
  3. Sock Monkey

    Sock Monkey Corporate slave

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,507
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA, USA, Earth
    ROFL. I was MY BIKE, I damn well know how it ran vs. spouting total sh*t about bikes YOU never owned.

    Flame away, your trolling is getting old (and I see you do the same on other brand threads, so I guess us MTS12 OWNERS shouldn't feel too privileged).

    Later,
    SM
  4. NMEXPAT

    NMEXPAT Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Oddometer:
    398
    Location:
    Houston
    :scratch


    Sounds like you've been riding the wrong bikes... :confused

    From reading your posts, you're looking at the WRONG V twin. How about a HARLEY?

    I hear they run awesome at 1.5k and 2k rpms.

    :amazon

    To be completely serious, the MTS1200 was never intended to be a bike to lug around at low rpms. The basis for the engine was originally WSBK racing (tuned differently of course).

    Yes, 1.5k and 2k rpms are now considered low and not midrange rpms. I've never had a problem with my 2010 MTS1200 at the low end. It pulls, it pulls hard and will lift the front wheel coming out of turns, all crossed up, even in urban mode. It's too much fun pretending to be Stoner coming out of corner all crossed up. I've yet to ride a bike that does this so easily and not wrapped up at 7k rpm.

    If you're going to nit pick the MTS1200, try something a little more relevant like the electronic suspension, electronic key or warping gas tanks.

    Have fun on your tiger!

    :wink:
  5. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,136
    Location:
    Sunny California
    That's coming from the right person. Pffff. And btw: if you can't deal with normal criticism, that's your problem. I don't give much about your opinion and your language shows what kind of guy you are - one I have no interest in communicating with anymore.
  6. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,136
    Location:
    Sunny California
    I can see that. No problem. Don't get me wrong here: my criticism is based on the first models that hit the States, the first fuel map that arrived here where lots of people said the engine is lagging, hacking, unhappy in that rev range.

    On the other hand, the Multi is marketed as bike that is meant also for urban traffic which might include stop and go and super slow rolling and also enduro style riding which means often enough slowly and carefully chugging through difficult passages. The Multi I rode didn't like those two things at all. Flowing with the traffic at 15mph was very, very uncomfortable, it was hacking, slapping the chain, vibrating and so on. Totally possible that a newer map corrected that, I never tested one again. The R1200GS I could ride at 5mph without any trouble. And YES, I understand that these are totally different bikes.

    What you don't seem to understand is that I'm not "nitpicking" the Multi, I'm saying what I didn't like when I rode it. I wrote a blog entry shortly after I rode one and had a few things that really annoyed me on that test ride. Interesting enough all these things were addressed in the 2011 and 2012 models. Being that the short rider seat space, the uneven fueling at steady speed, the luggage where you could look through the manufacturing gaps, I even read that the centerstand was slightly altered so that you don't get your heel on it all the time, though I cannot really confirm that as test sitting on a 2012 model felt the same for me with regard to that. I don't own a Multi, I test rode one twice and that were the results. If I owned one, I might start with the real problems but I never got that far as I disliked it already during the test ride enough so that the telepathic handling, the insane power, the unbelievably good brakes, and the really, really nice riding position couldn't make me buy one. And believe me - I was in the market.

    When I'm ready for my next bike I will ride one again and see whether the things I didn't like and that were supposedly addressed did something that makes it better for me, because from my perspective all these things are so unnecessary. Not certain about the low speed manners, as that might just be engine characteristic, but the rest was probably easily dealt with and some of it shouldn't have happened in the first place (luggage, and imho centerstand).

    But you know what - I didn't like the Multi enough to buy one, you did, so where's the problem? I'm not addressing anybody here personally (other than now ignoring some people), I'm saying what my impression of the bike was when I test rode it.
  7. Sock Monkey

    Sock Monkey Corporate slave

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,507
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA, USA, Earth
    I seem to remember one or more inmates here saying they were going to be taking their Italian princesses up to Alaska this summer. If anyone has, or will, please post a link to your RR here. I'd love to read about how they fare on the trip, especially the Dirty Dalton/Dempster portions. :D :wink: :thumb

    -SM
  8. SayItAintSo

    SayItAintSo Wanna be

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Oddometer:
    129
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    You thinking about making a trip?
  9. Sock Monkey

    Sock Monkey Corporate slave

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,507
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA, USA, Earth
    Been thinkin' about it for years. Originally got my GS with that in mind, but life got in the way and I had to put everything on hold. Now I'm back thinkin' about it again and hope some other "pioneers" will be the first and tell us what mods worked, and what mods didn't. I'm perfectly OK with learning from other's successes......and mistakes. :lol3 :freaky

    -SM
  10. SayItAintSo

    SayItAintSo Wanna be

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Oddometer:
    129
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    I've done several Ironbutt rides and the "Key West to Deadhorse in 30 days" ride is on my bucketlist. I always keep an eye out for any RR that has Alaska in the title.
  11. jimmex

    jimmex Guero con moto

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Oddometer:
    2,982
    Location:
    West Texas
    Not very much though; pretty impressive the rubber cow.:ricky
  12. NMEXPAT

    NMEXPAT Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Oddometer:
    398
    Location:
    Houston
    Sounds like you treated the demo bike very respectful and kept it tame and within the legal limits. I can appreciate that and I'm sure the dealer does as well. I did the same, but I had a feeling there was a beast inside...

    However when you own one, you will quickly find even in urban mode it is too tempting to push the limits or have too much fun. The bike begs to be ridden hard. Stuck in traffic? Not on this bike. Lane split, take short cuts. Feel and enjoy the nimbleness. Have fun while flipping the bird to the man and the system. Passing the cell phone talking bitch in front of you, yeah do it, do it now and do it quickly... Oh no another one? Pass that bitch too! Riding around the neighborhood where some through streets have speed bumps, wheelie them, wheelie them all!

    I'm not a stunter. I'm not a hoon. I'm not a squid, riding in flip flops wife beater with the helmet on the side. The abundance of torque and high end rush make all this available. I don't do this everyday, all the time, but when I judge the time and conditions correct it's there. The closest correlation I can think of is like owning a full auto or semi auto rifle and never sending a quick burst down range just because you can.

    I'm not a die hard ducatista (SP?) either. I realize this post may be misinterpreted as that. I've never ridden any other Ducati in my life. However, the MTS1200 really hit a cord with me, it just so happens to be made by Ducati. I think it's a shame Yamaha or Honda can't make a bike that's even close.
  13. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,136
    Location:
    Sunny California
    The thing is - that's how I ride 95% of the time. I have roughly about 200k miles riding experience, my hooligan times are long over (if they ever existed, I was always fairly down to earth), but from time to time I like to ride quick. Smooth, but quick. The kind of riding that doesn't accelerate much on the straights, but also doesn't brake much for the corners.

    I feel the Multistrada could be a lot of fun for these times, though I have my doubts that it would be as nice for the other 95% ... as long as some of the niggles I had were resolved, it might be okay, but it's also possible that it just becomes annoying very quickly. Transferred: I'm not the one living with a hot Italian diva just for the looks and those rare fun times, I like a partner which I can appreciate all the time. I found that in real life, and there are bikes out there that I look after (e.g. the Multi), but where I highly doubt I could live with as my main bike. Would be nice to have an adventure with nonetheless.
  14. NMEXPAT

    NMEXPAT Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Oddometer:
    398
    Location:
    Houston
    I'll save you time and possibly money, future heartbreak and resentment.:D

    The MTS1200 is NOT for you. :deal

    I appreciate your honesty, and hopefully you'll appreciate mine.:freaky
  15. hillbillypolack

    hillbillypolack Grumpy Old Goat

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Oddometer:
    6,485
    Location:
    Lidsville
    That's a well-written summary of my thoughts on the Multi as well. I test rode two-one recently before trading in my 07 GS for a 2012 camhead.

    I wanted to like the Multi, I really did. I also don't ride like a lunatic 90% of the time, but would enjoy the power and torque when I was able to put the spurs to it. The fact that the Multi felt jerky and out of its element in urban settings pushed me away from it. If I'm dropping 20k on a bike, it had best be sorted for its intended purpose. The Multi isn't an 848, where it 'needs' to live in that certain rev range. The Multi is supposed to be able to handle a broader range of riding, conditions and environments. It simply didn't convince me that it was designed for that.

    Even if I decided to get the Multi, I wonder how much it would have cost to get the bike sorted for urban riding, commuting in traffic and low speed riding. Don't get me wrong, it's competent at speed but what new bike isn't? At the asking price I was expecting more and it delivered less. I may also test ride a Multi in the future, so let's hope Audi can evolve the bike into a really great machine.
  16. Dave.0

    Dave.0 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Oddometer:
    838
    Location:
    north texas for now, sedona when I can get away
    I have an early 2010 bike and have no complaints about its fueling or low rpm riding. I did the reflashes when they came up but never noticed a real issue. I have almost 30k miles now and its a keeper for me. I plan to ride this thing into the ground. Maybe there is a large difference between bikes or maybe I have low expectations, but the fueling on my wr250x is worse. The MTS 1200 truly is a fantastic bike, as long as you get a "good" one.
  17. Sock Monkey

    Sock Monkey Corporate slave

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,507
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA, USA, Earth
    For many owners, that cost is.....$0. I have no aftermarket "stuff" on mine like FatDucs, mid-pipes, EFI controllers, etc. It's bone stock. It handles the urban jungle just fine, as well as touring and sport riding. And so far, it has handled all the unsealed roads I've taken it on without issue. If it didn't do these things, and do them VERY well, I never would have gotten it in the first place!

    What I do find a bit odd is there are either a wide range of expectations for this bike (along with a wide range of interpretations of "smooth", "torquey", etc), and/or there is a wide range of performance bike-to-bike. Both here and on Multi threads on other boards, there is a very wide range of impressions on this bike, and that just seems strange. Given how Ducati manufactures and tests their bikes (there was a very cool TV show about that a while ago....it might be on YouTube by now), I just don't see how there could be such variability in manufacture, leading me to believe the rider is really the variable, not the bike. Granted, over the last 2 years, all of the ECU updates have steadily improved the machine as a whole, but I still read these vastly different impressions from folks who take 2012's out for a spin! :dunno

    As another poster said, this bike isn't for everyone, and that's fine. What is very cool is right now we have a LOT of excellent choices in this space (I don't think there's a "bad" one in the bunch), so folks just need to find what blows their skirts up and enjoy the heck out of it.....and let others do the same. :norton

    -SM
  18. Sock Monkey

    Sock Monkey Corporate slave

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,507
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA, USA, Earth
    :thumb

    ROFL. Dave and I didn't compare notes before posting, I promise. :lol3

    -SM
  19. SayItAintSo

    SayItAintSo Wanna be

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Oddometer:
    129
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Very good points SM....I've often wondered if it was the riders being "ham fisted" with the Multi when the test rode them and didn't realize it was their riding style/ability that was causing the problem with them thinking the bike wasn't smooth rather than the bike being the problem. I know when riding my wife's Strom and times when I swapped bikes with my friend (who had a GS at the time) the throttle on those other bikes was much more forgiving for imprecise throttle control.
  20. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,136
    Location:
    Sunny California
    That won't happen. I might even get one*next year as a "mistress" for the fun hours but likely not as my main bike. It's a hobby for me, the money doesn't hurt me much, so if I want to I can just try it out ...