Evo engine vs Twin cam

Discussion in 'Road Warriors' started by Iranian, Sep 20, 2013.

  1. Iranian

    Iranian Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Oddometer:
    738
    Hi,

    How good or bad is the Twin cam compared to the evo engine?
    Is fare more reliable then the evo engine?

    I have testdriven lots of twin cam engines but no evo engined bike.


    Regards,

    Iranian
    #1
  2. anotherguy

    anotherguy Long timer

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Oddometer:
    6,636
    Location:
    the hills
    The TwinCam has several serious issues but makes more power. The Evo is a rock solid engine short on power.
    #2
  3. jazzmans

    jazzmans fickt euch

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Oddometer:
    9,596
    Location:
    Devils Playground nv
    the evo motor is a reliable motor. Probably the first in Harley's history.

    Twinkies seem to have some issues, heat is one of them hence the piss-heads coming out now, but I don't know enough guys with twinkies to give any real stats.
    #3
  4. GoonerYoda

    GoonerYoda Hot Dickens Cider

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Oddometer:
    846
    Location:
    Wine Country, CA
  5. Bueller

    Bueller Cashin?

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Oddometer:
    17,396
    Location:
    Hide Away Hills, Ohio
    #5
  6. Murf2

    Murf2 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Oddometer:
    857
    Location:
    Kansas
    We have both, an 89 FLHS & a 2000 Road King. I like 'em both. The TC makes more power & the whole bike is more modern, of course. I changed the cam chain tensioners at about 40K. They were OK but who knew. The EVO runs cooler & get better fuel mileage but it just feels like it's working to cruise 85, where the TC is just loafing along. IMO, Just get the bike you like, either motor is fine.

    Good Luck, Murf
    #6
  7. slipknot

    slipknot Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Oddometer:
    866
    Hey! Where's Jerry?:lol3
    #7
  8. anotherguy

    anotherguy Long timer

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Oddometer:
    6,636
    Location:
    the hills
    In the past month or so I have replaced 5 sets of cam chain tensioners. From 15 to 70 thousand miles. They were all first generation. I've done two sets of second generation this summer. I can do the job in 3 hours now I've done so many.
    #8
  9. JerryH

    JerryH Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,069
    Location:
    Chandler, AZ
    It's about time someone asked this question. IMO, the EVO is a far superior motor. Not that they have not made a few improvements with the TC, but using 2 cams and a chain drive is not one of them. Neither is using a pressed together non serviceable crank. The Twin Cam was designed to make factory assembly easier (and of course cheaper) at the cost of most of it being disposable rather than rebuildable. And then there is that heat issue. So if the only thing gained was power, the TC is a total fail. The EVO had plenty for what it went into. A cruiser. Harley copied a lot of Japanese design and manufacturing techniques with the TC, and that is one place they had been way ahead of the Japanese with the EVO.
    #9
  10. 0ldhippie

    0ldhippie Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Oddometer:
    578
    Location:
    Sacramento
    Twin cams are better than evos. Only real issue with TC are the early cam chain tensioners. They just need to be checked every 10-20K miles (many bikes want valve adjustments at lower mileages). Later ones ('07 up) are better. TCs do have crank problems when ya start building them over 100hp but few EVOs ever came near 100hp. EVOs had just as many camcase problems as TCs. My '09 103TC is putting out 99hp/109tq with pretty much only pipes/AC/cams and is way better than any of my EVOs that blew up.
    #10
  11. Anorak

    Anorak Woolf Barnato

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Oddometer:
    35,160
    Location:
    OAK
    Have you ever owned a Harley?
    #11
  12. NuckaMan

    NuckaMan Space Available

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Oddometer:
    354
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    He has owned and experienced everything, but only on the internet.
    #12
  13. Bar None

    Bar None Candy Ass

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    Oddometer:
    5,324
    Location:
    WNC SWFL
    No, but he is thinking about getting one as soon as he saves up the money.:rofl
    #13
  14. TxRoadDog

    TxRoadDog Shut up and ride

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Oddometer:
    528
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Considering my evo has torn up something and the cam is now screaming and my lifter screen is full of metal shavings, and the previous owner rounded off one of my exhaust bolts so I can't get it off easily.. I may be a little biased, but I will try to give you MY opinion on it. Keep in mind all of my problems are coming from a previous owner screw up, so, it's not the bikes fault.

    Evo's, in my opinion, are the better engine if you aren't trying to build them up to be high horse power engines... they were designed to plug along at low RPM's with just enough horse power and torque to get the job done, and that is how they should stay. The good thing about the evolution motor, is that they have the Timken bearing; something Harley has not put in the twin cam since 2002. Nothing worse than having your non-rebuildable flywheel coming out of true in your post 2002 twin cam because you had no timken bearing... Evo's have gear driven cams, which can be a blessing if something does go south in the cam chest because they're relatively easy to work on. Keep in mind that you can put timken bearings on a twin cam flywheel and you CAN go to gear driven cams. You simply ship your bottom end out and the mechanic/shop will install races into your cases and the bearings on the crank pin, and you can have them true your flywheel and weld it up nice and strong if you'd like which is the best way to go. The only major problem I can tell with the evolution motor is the fact that lifters need replacement every 40,000 miles, but that is an EASY job to do... and the crappy stock INA cam bearing that needs to be swapped out with a torrington which is also an easy job to do. Evo's will eventually develop a base gasket leak, but proper warming up of the motorcycle will keep this from happening for a LONG time.

    Right now I'm looking at a little over 2k to fix my bike. I haven't gotten inside the came chest yet, but I figure if I'm going into it I might as well replace the rockers, pushrods, swap out the lifters, and put in an Andrews EV27 cam, and put a Torrington inner cam bearing in. I'm just hoping there aren't a whole lot of metal shavings in the engine. A crane singlefire ignition is on the list, along with a honing of the jugs and a re-ring, and head work... valve seats and all that. After all of this the bike should take me to 150k with no problems as long as I keep up on the periodic maintenance. I love this old evo but she sure has been a head ache.
    #14
  15. El Pescador

    El Pescador Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Oddometer:
    251
    Location:
    Spring, TX

    Great! Have you lowered your quoted hours to reflect the time savings?
    :evil

    I bought my FXDL with 52K on the clock. The tensioners were gone by then and had to be replaced.
    #15
  16. 996DL

    996DL Buell me

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Oddometer:
    2,372
    Location:
    finally back in paradise...
    I'm just totally at ease, what with now knowing that the Sportster based motor in my Buell,
    is seemingly devoid of all the issues found in these troublesome big twins. :happay:lol3

    Love this thread,
    BIG potential...

    996DL
    #16
  17. bobbed06

    bobbed06 Cavalera Conspirator

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Oddometer:
    1,236
    Location:
    That one place......
    Throw in a set of these with upgraded cam bearings and the 99-02 Twin Cam was the sledgehammer Twin Cam......The Evo is a great engine, but by the time you get it to make anywhere near 100HP its a grenade.

    Pics inside mine....

    [​IMG]
    #17
  18. JerryH

    JerryH Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,069
    Location:
    Chandler, AZ
    It's true the EVO engine will not hold up to hot rodding (I know a Harley/Harley clone mechanic, and watched him rebuild an 80" EVO) But I don't understand this thing about power with a Harley. You want power, get a Hayabusa. A Harley is a cruiser. It's purpose is just to kick back and ride, enjoying the vibration and that wonderful exhaust sound. It is not a sport bike nor a muscle bike.

    It's also a bike that many people like to spend thousands of dollars on in chrome, paint, and leather. But I'm not that type. A stock Harley EVO with some slightly louder than stock pipes would satisfy me just fine.
    #18
  19. fallingoff

    fallingoff Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Oddometer:
    3,677
    Location:
    syd oz
    Both not real hd
    Last was the shovel designed by the original hd
    Lol
    Cheers
    Amf for the evo
    Gang of 13 for the twin cam
    #19
  20. JerryH

    JerryH Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,069
    Location:
    Chandler, AZ
    The EVO did not come out until HD separated from AMF. The Shovelhead was an AMF engine. It was the only AMF/Harley-Davidson engine AMF ever made.
    #20