f650gs vs vstrom abs again

Discussion in 'Parallel Universe' started by melodicly, Aug 23, 2007.

  1. melodicly

    melodicly illeteratte

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    37
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    Hey guys, I put this in the regional forum, but figured I would drop it here too. Want a bike for mostly commuting in New Orleans where the roads are TERRIBLE! It is not uncommon to see 10 car sized holes on a three mile ride, so I need something that can handle it if I do accidentaly hit one. I do a lot of long distance too and that is why I am not really looking at the KLR. I do want ABS, upright seating and visibilty. So these bikes are pretty much the same price, but of course I lean towards the beemer. Why? I dunno, that's why I'm here hopin to learn from your vast wisdom and experience! I have to say the strom looks and feels top heavy to me compared to beemer, but maybe the twin makes an 8 hour drive more enjoyable. BMW probably has better ABS because they have been making longer, or maybe not. I dunno, lay it on me. Is the Rotax smooth at hwy speed? Is the Vstrom as flickable as the beemer? Which is more reliable and easier maintence? Which has a better resale? I would guess they are both pretty good for a new rider, but which has the durability for those small driveway drops or downtown drunk guy knocks the bike over while parked? How bout insurence on these bikes? Any difference between the two? Well u get the point. Thanks guys and gals for a very informative site. Sorry for the bad spelling habits too.
    Dale
    #1
  2. wrightstuff

    wrightstuff AUTO DOC

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Oddometer:
    15
    Location:
    selden ny
    My wife has an 05 vstrom and I had the pleasure of putting 6000 miles on it this summer while yamaha had my fjr for 4 months to do a timing chain under warranty.I have to tell you,it's one of the best handling bikes I've ridden in a long time.The friggen thing is on rails.Had real bad buffeting at all speeds so I got the madstad adjustable windscreen mount and suzukis larger windscreen.both are a must have if you do any long distance.I dont think the wheels would hold up very well during pothole pinball though.I'm not sure but I think there are aftermarket spoke wheels available for the weestrom now.I did hit a few fire roads in upstate new york and she worked quite well.It has apretty comfy seat and great gas mileage.She will thrum along all day at 80-90 mph.I was really surprised by the overall performance of the 650.I traded the fjr and now have an 07 r1200gsa so I havent ridden the suzuki in a while.I rode a 650 dakar once for about 150 miles and if you do a fair amount of superslab riding I'd go with the vstrom.If your riding will be MOSTLY the commute within the pothole minefields I'd pick thr f650.Go to dealers and ride both if you can,thats the only way you can really decide.
    #2
  3. melodicly

    melodicly illeteratte

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    37
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    thanks alot....I have heard nothing but great things about the vstrom, but yeah most of my riding will be local roads with a trip every four months or so. I wonder, would the larger front wheel on the Dakar make a large differance with rough roads?
    #3
  4. melodicly

    melodicly illeteratte

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    37
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    where did it go?

    edited: I didn't even realize this section existed!
    #4
  5. Uncle Pollo

    Uncle Pollo Long timer

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Oddometer:
    49,916
    Location:
    Albuquerque, Neue Messico
    More slab (even in bad shape)= Strom

    More trails = bmw
    #5
  6. sooner02r1

    sooner02r1 Wannabe

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Oddometer:
    334
    Location:
    Norman, OK

    +1
    #6
  7. Dolly Sod

    Dolly Sod I want to do right, but not right now

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2003
    Oddometer:
    14,654
    Location:
    Richmond, Va
    Wee Strom has more power.

    ABS is the same from bike to bike. I believe both bikes use bosch units so there's no advantage from one to the other.

    Wee doesn't get as good a fuel economy.

    F650 is lighter. Holds its fuel down lower, but it's battery up higher.
    Battery terminals are difficult to get tightened down correctly, and lots of plastic to remove to get to the battery.
    Regrease steering head bearings immediately.
    Some sort of reoccuring water pump issue that I don't now much about.
    Torx fasteners everywhere..

    From riding with people on the 650GS, I'd say it's build quality is lower than that of the Strom. Seems to not handle the vibration, and shaking of off road as well. Lots of plastic bits go flying.

    Both bikes will cruise on the interstate comfortably.

    Both have a top speed over 100 mph. Strom is faster by a few mph. 105 vs 110.

    IMHO, you get more bike for the money with the Strom.

    What ever you do, don't get the crap BMW bags if you get the 650 GS. Rack is crap, and the bags really don't seem to take a fall over well at all.

    YMMV
    #7
  8. MrBob

    MrBob Out there

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Oddometer:
    9,086
    Location:
    longmont, CO, etc.
    I doubt that you could go wrong with either bike. Like you, I went back and forth and then chose the 650 Strom. It may be the best bike I've ever owned for commuting and touring. My off-road skills are so modest that I've never been able to max out the strom there but I now ride on Colorado back roads quite a bit with a fair amount of confidence.
    #8
  9. McB

    McB Joe 40 ouncer

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Oddometer:
    15,461
    Location:
    North Slope of the Flint Hills
    Now that the Versys is available, it might be worth a look too. I've got no complaints about my Wee-Strom. There's lots of folks around here that do 500+ mile days on KLRs, and the new one is especially nice (and cheap). Price of admission on the BMW is steep, but their owners love them. Good choices all.
    #9
  10. twinrider

    twinrider pass the catnip

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Oddometer:
    10,833
    Location:
    日本
    I've got a GS. It gets amazing gas mileage, is really nimble, has great throttle response and is a lot of fun to ride on back roads, both sealed and unsealed. I haven't ridden a wee so I can't say much about it other than I sat on one and it seemed physically much bigger than the bmw. Try both of them and decide after that.
    #10
  11. RaY YreKa

    RaY YreKa Palanquins RTW

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Oddometer:
    16,338
    Location:
    Carried Forth
    I do 600 miles of urban riding on a 650gs (per month) and I really do think it's ideal. Our UK roads vary from passable to downright dangerous. I like that the GS is light, punches very well out of corners in the 5000rpm range, holds a line with great stability, and returns very good mpg. Since it's easy to max out the engine you can have great fun finding the limits of the bike.

    As others have said, the Wee is probably a better long-distance machine in terms of bhp and comfort. If you do big days in the saddle of a GS you probably need an aftermarket seat and screen.

    Fwiw I think I'd appreciate a DL650 from a fit-for-purpose angle, but I doubt I'd enjoy it in quite the same way as the GS.

    Ray
    #11
  12. PeterW

    PeterW Long timer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Oddometer:
    3,037
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    I used to own one of the older carbed F650's.

    The DL's finish is about as good as that was - i.e. better than the newer 650GS's.

    The cast wheels on the DL are pretty tough, you'd be bending rims on either bike at about the same point. The spoked wheel MIGHT be cheaper to repair, but check it before you let that make the decision for you. I pretty much ignore urban potholes and "speed control measures" on the DL - BUT - if the roads are as nasty as you say, budget $300 for heavier springs for the DL.

    On road the DL is better than the F, except on really slow tight corners. The speed difference is more than stated above - the DL gets up to 100mph + speeds pretty quickly, the F won't. (Quite a lot more passing power).

    Off road, the F was a bit more nimble, the DL far less effort - note I'm talking nasty dirt roads here, not single track.

    Pete
    #12
  13. twinrider

    twinrider pass the catnip

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Oddometer:
    10,833
    Location:
    日本
    I bought my 2004 GS with 14,000 miles on it. The finish is impressive. No corrosion on any of the aluminum bits or painted metal parts (wheels, motor, frame) and the bodywork's paint is still in excellent condition. I've owned a few Suzukis (three Bandits, Burgman 650) and have to say that I wasn't too impressed with the finish on any of them, especially the paint, which seemed thin and easy to scratch.
    #13
  14. melodicly

    melodicly illeteratte

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    37
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    thanks everybody. very informative as usual....I think I am gonna have to go Vstrom, but I do like the light nimble feeling the GS offers, but I just think I would be more interested in long trips on the dl. Thanks again
    #14
  15. jeffV

    jeffV boob

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Oddometer:
    33
    Location:
    Central PA
    I ride a K7 DL650 Vstrom. My wife rides a K7 f650gs. First off I can honestly say both are great bikes! I have 12000 mile on mine since April and my wife has 3000 on hers since July. The beemer wins in the fuel economy department regularly getting 10MPH better the the Wee. 60 MPH Vs 70MPH. On our last trip she averaged 79MPH. The Wee delivers the power to the rear wheel a little more aggressively and in my humble opinion feels more solid when running in the high 70s to mid 80s. This is not to say the Beemer is scary at these speeds it is just the Wee has more wind protection and more weight. My wife's bike feels a bit small to my 5'9" 220lb frame. It is the lowered model but with your feet on the pegs the ride should be the same. Her bike seems to like the dirt a little better but now that I replaced the trailwings with Torrance's the Wee seems better also. The beemer was $1500 more and this is were I think the Wee wins.
    Less money! The beemer commands more attention where ever we go and as she so eloquently puts it is "One Sweet Ride". Which ever bike you choose you will be happy with but the Wee may keep you happy longer due to the more powerful "big bike" feel. Also little things like 2 trip odometers, a fuel guage and more powerful headlights help tip the scales toward the Wee. I hope this helps just be aware if my wife was the one writing this the scales may tip more towards the little BMW :wink:. As a final thougt I sat on a Versus and although it was a nice bike it did not temp me away from either of the bikes we now own.
    Good luck, Jeff
    #15
  16. melodicly

    melodicly illeteratte

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Oddometer:
    37
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    Yeah I have glanced at the versys, but it just really isn't appealing to me. The Vdtrom seems like the bike, but I am a little nervous about the "big bike" feel. I am only 5'11" and 145lbs. It is a 650, looks like a liter and feels like an 800. The beemer, looks like a 650 but feels like a 400 or something. I am a new rider, so now that we have established that they are both great bikes, with the beemer havinga few more draw backs lets change the focus from bike to rider for a moment. I read on the stromtropper forum that the V may not be the best first bike. Better yet it may not be the best bike for commuting on crappy skinny local roads. Now as mentioned I do want to be able to go to TN/NC four five times a year (about an 8 hour ride minding the limit) and this seems to really be the thing that keeps pointing me towards the V. I don't see myslef making good time on the f650, where with the V I would probably just keep going. So to make a long story short....
    For a new rider what trade of should I make from a safety perspective? Better long distance comfert or better in town "flickability"?
    Thanks a lot guys for all the info, your kind support and info is part of what makes me want to be a part of the motorcycling community....now if I could only get jazz musicians to get together and help each other out like that!
    #16
  17. NateLePain

    NateLePain Long timer

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Oddometer:
    4,861
    Location:
    Central AR
    I commute nearly everyday on a 2006 F650GS and consistantly get 60MPG. The bike handles fine at highway speeds and I have plenty of power to pass at 80MPH (no down shifting required). There is a terrific group at f650.com that has invested a lot of time about the pros/cons of the F650.

    I ride 90% street / 10% dirt and the bike is terrific. I am 5'11", 230lbs and the bike can feel small at times but all in all it is terrific. Did I mention that I get 60MPG?...

    If I was looking for a bike to commute only, I would strongly consider the KW Versys, ABS and the Triumph Street Triple.
    #17
  18. twinrider

    twinrider pass the catnip

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Oddometer:
    10,833
    Location:
    日本
    I'm 5'7''. I sat on a Wee at the dealer and it felt like a really big bike, not that much different than the 1k. One thing I really like is the compactness of the F650. Right now I'm riding it more than my TDM900 (which is a similar size to the Wee) because it's just so easy to chuck around corners, pull wheelies on, etc. Like a motard only comfortable. Got 63mpg the other day despite a "spirited" pace :wink:
    It's an extremely comfortable bike. All day rides are no problem and I'd have no problem taking it on multi-day trips (Heck, Striking Viking rode his around the world). That said, if I was carrying a passenger and their luggage, I'd want a bigger bike.
    #18
  19. beaste

    beaste Adventurer

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Oddometer:
    16
    Location:
    oxley highway new south wales australia
    I have a K5 Vstrom 650. Im 163 cm tall, 5f5i in old language and as i run the suspension on its hardest settings for handling reasons, the seat is at the limits of my ability to cope. No worries though,,,although tall, its balance and light weight, well compared to some of my previous bikes, makes this managable.

    Two up with panniers and roll bag on back its all a bit of fun particularly mounting and dismounting!

    The Funduro is a great bike but for the small increase in fuel usage the Vee Strom is a far better option if all your riding is on tar or good dirt roads. If your into tough fire trails the Funduro is better but remember not that much better as its still basically a road bike not a full on chook chaser unless you buy the dakkar version or the just released enduro model.

    There is a suzuki factory lowering option...revised links and a further chop of the seat that will lower the seat height by 25mm I believe. Drama here is it also reduces what is an already marginal ground clearence for a chookie!:eek1

    Reality is if you want longish suspension travel, good ground clearence and a seating position not like a trials bike then seat height is one the thing which will go UP!
    #19
  20. twinrider

    twinrider pass the catnip

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Oddometer:
    10,833
    Location:
    日本
    BMW stopped making the Funduro in 1999.
    #20