Heidenau K60

Discussion in 'Parallel Universe' started by upweekis, Apr 11, 2010.

  1. Apostolos

    Apostolos Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Oddometer:
    391
    Location:
    The Sierras
    Sorry.

    I've got a new TKC 80 rear I'll give you a deal on.

    God Bless,
    David
  2. johngil

    johngil Reseda, CA

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Oddometer:
    3,816
    I've got a couple of 140's in the garage. I may never need them, but bought a couple anyway.
    I like the K-60's, but generally stick w/ the 606 front and rear.
  3. Apostolos

    Apostolos Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Oddometer:
    391
    Location:
    The Sierras
    Do you ride much on pavement with the 606s?

    God Bless,
    David
  4. johngil

    johngil Reseda, CA

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Oddometer:
    3,816
    More than I like. 50/50 at times.
  5. Apostolos

    Apostolos Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Oddometer:
    391
    Location:
    The Sierras
    I'm commuting to work daily off-road, but I'm also on the road quite a bit up here in the mountains as well.

    I need a tire that can handle the twisties here in the mountains and not disintegrate after a few thousand miles and also be aggressive enough for all the mining trails/forest service roads/ and rocky jeep trails here in the mountains as well.

    I'm hoping I'll find that balance in the K60s.

    God Bless,
    David
  6. Pete O Static

    Pete O Static Adventure Seeker

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2009
    Oddometer:
    620
    Location:
    The Great White North
  7. ba_

    ba_ Long timer

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Oddometer:
    2,992
    Location:
    Westchester County, New York
  8. blender

    blender Just another rider

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Oddometer:
    732
    Location:
    The Middle Coast
    Just called Moto-Amore and they have no Heidenau K60's in 140/80 17 (I didn't even try bother asking about the 150). The Heindal Engineering http://www.heindlengineering.com/ site also lists the 140/150 as unobtanium.

    Looks like I'll have to try something else for my partial trip down the CDT in July.
  9. DUC54

    DUC54 Giddy Up!!!

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Oddometer:
    95
    Location:
    Omak Washington
    Just returned home from a 5500 mile Alaska trip, lots of fun and a great ride!!! Just a little info on the Heidenau k60's. Awesome tire!!!! I was loaded with everything but the kitchen sink. The 800gs with me on it weighed 370 kilos = 824lbs. We rode about 75-80 mph on black top, and anywhere from 25 to 70 mph on the Dempster, and Top of the World Hwy. No problems in either environment......stuck like glue in the corners, and very good in the gravel. Highway dept was watering, (with calcium mixture) and grading both the Dempster, and Top of World Hwy. Yes, it was slick, but the tires were great. There was one section with about 6 inch deep gravel.....had a couple of head shake issues, but not the tire's fault.

    There is a little less than a quarter inch left in the middle of the tread. Interesting though...the tires seemed to look that way in Tok on our way down off the Top pf world hwy. They just didn't wear much after getting to that point. I am buying another set when available for sure. I had the 150 on the rear. I had gotten a set for my friend's KTM 950 140 rear. His seemed to have about half the amount of tread left that I have. His bike with him on it 410 kilos. We both agreed that for what we put them through they were great. Just my thoughts on the tire.


    Giddy UP!!!!!
    Allen
  10. soph9

    soph9 Would Love to ride ALL the TIME

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Oddometer:
    2,624
    Location:
    Stony Brook. NY
    got my K60's installed on Friday and broke them in today by riding 100km with some on a forest rode....a little more vibration on the road but other than that they feel great on the tar....can't really tell yet off road...here are a few pics...[​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
  11. huckleberry

    huckleberry BACK ROAD BOMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Oddometer:
    1,107
    Location:
    N.E. Pa.
    looks good! if you weigh about 200lbs add about 3/8" preload to the front and get a rear spring and you'll be all set! you'll love the tires and keep the air up no worries with the rims then.
  12. soph9

    soph9 Would Love to ride ALL the TIME

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Oddometer:
    2,624
    Location:
    Stony Brook. NY
    don't weigh near 200 lbs but the bike will be carrying lot's of gear for our cross country trip and I have the preload as high as it goes....I like it that way...they make the 650 look better we think...second set go on our other bike Saturday!
  13. huckleberry

    huckleberry BACK ROAD BOMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Oddometer:
    1,107
    Location:
    N.E. Pa.
    check your sag in the front end especially, you should in the rear too. put the bike on the ctr stand and measure how much space you have for travel then sit on the bike and take the same measurement again you should only have a difference of 20-30% of the travel. the front will probably need a little preload as i know mine would drop 2" under its own weight.if you do this the bike will handle and ride much better especially when loaded and you'll end up with more ground clearance for any off road riding.
  14. Barnacle

    Barnacle Lurker Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Oddometer:
    27
    Location:
    Bothell, WA
    Are the tread patterns supposed to be reversed between the front and rear tires? I noticed the front tire tread pattern is opposite the rear tire. Is that right?
  15. WoodWorks

    WoodWorks House Ape

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Oddometer:
    2,339
    Location:
    Ashland, OR, USA
    Yes, that is correct for the Heidenau. You can verify this by checking the rotation arrows on the sidewall. The rationale is that the main purpose for the tread pattern is different for the front and rear tire: the rear needs traction more for acceleration, and the front needs it more for braking.

    David
  16. Barnacle

    Barnacle Lurker Extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Oddometer:
    27
    Location:
    Bothell, WA
    Very interesting..

    Thanks for pointing that out!
  17. AKtracks

    AKtracks Kilted Fükengrüver

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Oddometer:
    1,261
    Location:
    Fairbanks, Alaska
    Yes, that's the correct installation for providing greater friction under acceleration for the rear tire and greater friction under braking for the front tire. Many tire tread patterns are manufactured this way, it's just not as noticeable on less aggressive tread.

    edit: 205'd by WoodWorks
  18. dsrydr

    dsrydr Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Oddometer:
    275
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    Yes the rear tread is going forward for traction in acceleration, the front is reversed for traction in braking.

    EDIT: Didn't mean to be redundant here, got a phone call while typing this.
  19. soph9

    soph9 Would Love to ride ALL the TIME

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Oddometer:
    2,624
    Location:
    Stony Brook. NY
    and to think I did not even notice that...but now that I look at my pics I see it...good info guys!
  20. bxr140

    bxr140 Flame Bait

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,041
    Location:
    On high
    FWIW, The difference between 20 and 30 percent is pretty big...and 20% is a bit too small for proper preload. Most tuners reccomend 25% (or more), I find (if it matters) 30% to be a good starting point.