Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Road Warriors' started by EetsOK, Dec 8, 2012.
Who the other be.
That sound track was gay. It sounds ridiculous.
And who cares if "Indian" makes a "comeback"??? A Polaris Indian is as much an Indian as a Kawasaki Harley.
They either need to build a motorcycle that is worth owning on its merits, or go the way of the dodo. Again.
There's absolutely zero connection between an Indian motorcycle from 1940 and a Polaris motorcycle in 2015, and being proud of the name badge on the tank is fucking childish.
If I was a decision maker at Polaris I would ditch the Indian name completely, and create a new line of bikes that people actually want.
They already are. Polaris is continuing on with the old Gilroy/Kings Mountain "Power Plus" (ie redecorated Evo) since last eyar when they took over. Been building bikes at Spirit Lake for about year now.
Come on.....Polaris is a $3B company. To think this Indian experiment could kill the company is silly. If it fails, it dies. Polaris and Victory will go on.
Polaris has a pretty sketchy history of design and if Indians were about one thing, it was design.
I laughed so hard at this I pulled my jejunum.
I think if Polaris can't do it with Victory, then they can't do it with Indian's name.
99% of cruiser riders would rather be on a Harley than anything else. Indian's heritage could crack that nut, but not with parts bin bikes.
Polaris the company has had a terrific track record in a really competitive field...make that fields. Some small snowmobile company in Minnesota is now a multibillion dollar manufacturing company. Their snowmobiles rock, their atvs are really good...and they make a motorcycle too
I talked to one of their engineers at Sturgis and he said Indian will be more nostalgia/traditional, and Victory would go more techy. Makes sense. Indian can appeal to those who like fringes, Victory can pivot toward more touring stuff/muscle bikes. Hey, it wouldn't take a great leap of engineering for them to use their snowmobile/atv expertise and make a reallystonking adventure or dirt-bike. Stranger things have happened.
Triumph didn't get to where they are today by only building bikes on the Bonneville platform. Indian can keep their heritage shtick while still bringing something other than just a another V-Twin cruiser to the market. I'd like to see them try something like the Griso.
I mean, it's not like they have to be worried about alienating a legion of owners.
I wish they would. A Polaris dual sport would rock
There is the Adventure Touring Victory Vision -
The Indians I've seen ridden around here have been owned by deep pocket folks that appear to like the uniqueness and overall fit/finish rather than the how good a motorcycle it is compared to others based on performance specs or clone parts, etc. They are dressed in beautiful paint and very nice leather to make for a very visually appealing albeit expensive piece of arm candy (if you are into this particular look). Biggest issue will still be the cost of certifying two engines with the same basic application within the same Brands family with relatively low volumes in both Brands. You likely have to have some thoughts that as the "old" Vic mill reaches the end of it's current life span for US and Euro noise and emissions that the new platform would provide at least a share able base to carry them forward that the current designs won't allow. Be real nice if they sort/upgrade to tubeless rims, better handling and maybe add some options of cruise and/or abs like Victory and other OEM offerings have. Super high price with little or none of the Industry standards will not help sales either.
Blingy cruiser = "butt jewelry"
"arm candy" = trophy wife / hot girlfriend
I agree. What type of vintage Indian fetches the highest prices? The inline four. Make a shaft drive, water cooled, inline four like the guy in England was doing. You could still splatter it with all of the tassles and stuff, but at its core, it would still be intersting and stand out from the crowd.
I've always thought it would be awesome if, as a revival thing, they went in more of a Buell-esque direction. I mean cruisers were a thing that Indian did, but it seems like the bikes that these companies are always emulating are the bikes that Indian made just before they died. It seems like a much better idea to take a few steps back, and say hey, Indian was a company on the forefront of motorcycle innovation in the states; why not make it so again?
Sure, innovation is a risk, but people have attempted several times already to revive Indian in the generic American cruiser format; it has never worked! Making something distinctive and or innovative might actually get something going. Doing nearly exactly the same thing as the last three companies is going to end them in exactly the same place as the last three companies.
Be interesting if they did go the Triumph route. Make your clones for that end of the nostalgia market, but go ahead and make some modern sports bikes and tourers.
How about an Indian version of something like a Speed Triple, or some other hooligan street bike?
They've got money. Hire some designers, don't get stuck in a V-twin mode, and make a real varied American motorcycle brand. BMW certainly changed their brand image with the introduction of the S1000RR, and it obviously worked well.
A modern Enfield/Indian would be an interesting piece.
My take on it...
Long time ago in far far away galaxy Indian was one and only true american sportbike. They were not all show, they actually were fast bikes aiming at being sporty to some extend. E.g. they were basis of US racing motorcycles. They were winning Isle of Man TT. They made Scout, they made Prince, they made Four. They were favored by "wall of death" riders. They were winning Daytona. Etc. etc. They were cutting edge. Engineered. Fast.
I do have big fat book on Indian history that was given as present to me by my friends, I always wanted Scout for myself.
Naturally I always thought that if Indian would be brought back it will be first proper fast US made V-twin "classic" design bike, not another overweight unsuspended damned cruiser. Something a-la Mr. Buell meets modern fast Indian twin engine.
It is highly disappointing that with all industrial, historical and knowledge potential of US motorcycling life it keeps producing same boring and unsuitable cruiser bikes.
I know US industry can do better.
Wow. Guess you're not a Victory fan...
If it was a modern materials and construction flathead Chief there's be a line to buy it at $30K each. And I'd be in that line. The obvious is often so easy as to be almost invisible.
Not really, but at least they created Victory from the ground up. I can't stand to see what has been / is being done to the Indian name. The post by bluesman nails it to a T - Indian was proud company, with good reason to be proud because they were the top of the line in their day.
The closest thing to an Indian today, would be Motus - American made, innovative, performance oriented transportation - not a rolling pirate parade for posers.