Honda CT 90/110 Questions

Discussion in 'Battle Scooters' started by Dirt Road Cowboy, Feb 27, 2012.

  1. Dirt Road Cowboy

    Dirt Road Cowboy Sometimes I'm A Jerk

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    513
    Location:
    Tyler, Texas
    I'm thinking about building a CT90/110 with a Lifan engine. I'm going to buy a frame and build it up from a bare frame. It won't be anything really stock looking, probably more of a rat type bike, for real ADV use.

    My first question is, are they the same frame?

    Also, is there any particular years to avoid due to poor construction etc.?

    What would be the maximum size engine one of these frames could hold?

    If I think of any other questions, I'll be sure to bug you guys!

    Thanks!
    #1
  2. hugemoth

    hugemoth Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Oddometer:
    3,092
    Location:
    In the TARDIS
    The frames are pretty much the same with the exception being the pre 1967 models which were CT200s. It's slightly easier to mount the clone engines in the CT200 frame.

    They are all plenty sturdy.

    Max engine size would be any size horizontal clone engine you can find.
    #2
  3. Dirt Road Cowboy

    Dirt Road Cowboy Sometimes I'm A Jerk

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    513
    Location:
    Tyler, Texas
    How much easier is it to mount in the CT200 frame? Would it justify the extra cost?

    Are the other parts all basically interchangeable, such as the forks and swing arm?

    Thanks!
    #3
  4. hugemoth

    hugemoth Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Oddometer:
    3,092
    Location:
    In the TARDIS
    The thing that makes the CT200 easier is that the frame is the right width and the mounting holes are in the right place. Mounting a clone engine in a later model CT90 or 110 requires a few minutes of sheet metal grinding with an angle grinder, drilling a couple holes, and using some washers as spacers. No big deal. I recommend you join the clone engine yahoo group for a wealth of info on the subject.

    http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/honda_clone
    #4
  5. stiggs13

    stiggs13 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2010
    Oddometer:
    209
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    i had a early 70's with a 150cc lifan motor, seemed to go ok, i think my 110 has more power or maybe better gearing, my 90 doesnt have the same power i would aim for a mid 70's frame k5 and up
    #5
  6. Dirt Road Cowboy

    Dirt Road Cowboy Sometimes I'm A Jerk

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    513
    Location:
    Tyler, Texas
    Okay, I'll get a CT200 frame to simplify the process.
    Also, is a pre 67 CT90 the same as the CT200?

    Now I need to decide on an engine. Would you suggest the Lifan 140 or 150? I've read that the 140 is more reliable.
    Does anyone have experience with both of them?
    What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

    I want to get as much power as possible, but keep reliability. If I have to go smaller for a more reliable engine, I will.

    Thanks again guys!

    :1drink



    .
    #6
  7. hugemoth

    hugemoth Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Oddometer:
    3,092
    Location:
    In the TARDIS
    I was wrong, a pre-1966 would be a CT200. Both the CT200 and CT90 were called Trail 90s. It'll probably be easier to find a CT90 than a CT200.

    My Lifan experience is only with the 110cc, 140cc, and 200cc vertical cylinder so I can't comment on the 150cc. Never a problem with any of them. The 110 is a smooth running engine with a little more power than the stock CT90. The 140 has a lot of low end power making it great for off road riding and it'll push the CT 55 to 60 mph depending on conditions. The only drawback is it takes a lot of umph to kick over and tends to kick back. If you go with the 150 engine make sure it comes with high output stator and flywheel if you're going to use it on the street. All of the 150s I've seen come with the "racing" stator which won't power a full lighting system.


    #7
  8. Dirt Road Cowboy

    Dirt Road Cowboy Sometimes I'm A Jerk

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    513
    Location:
    Tyler, Texas
    I like the way your bike looks with the 140 and the bigger gas tank. I think that the small tanks Honda put on their trail bikes was one of the dumbest things they ever did. I had a CT70 when I was younger, and that .6 gallon tank was just ridiculous!

    I have noticed that the frames marked CT200 were quite a bit more expensive than the ones stamped CT90. Usually by $50 or more. Was there ever actually a 200cc engine in any of these?

    Also, are the other parts (triple tree, swing arm, etc.) interchangeable between the years?

    Thanks!


    .
    #8
  9. showkey

    showkey Long timer

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,018
    Location:
    Wausau
    CT 200 was 05/1964 to 04/1966 VIN (CT200-1000001) 04/1966 changed to CT90 designation CT90K0..... 1966 to 1968 VIN (CT90-100001had 4 speeds with dual rear sprockets, late in that run dual range trans appeared. All had leading link front suspension. 1969 CT90K1 VIN (CT90-200001) appeared with telescopic front suspension.

    CT90K1 to CT90 1979 are all very very similar color and graphics and minor up grades turn signal etc almost all parts interchange on this series

    All were 89 cc all called Trail 90
    #9
  10. Dirt Road Cowboy

    Dirt Road Cowboy Sometimes I'm A Jerk

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    513
    Location:
    Tyler, Texas
    Well, I bought a 64-66 (?) (CT200-149256) CT200 frame, and found a good deal on a Lifan 140cc engine.

    Should I go with the stock triple tree and forks, or is there a better option? This will be used on the road as well as for some off-road trail exploration.

    Will the tree and forks from a later model work?

    Thanks. I'm actually getting excited over a little trail bike! What am I, 12 again??? :rofl:rofl:rofl



    .
    #10
  11. Woodsrat

    Woodsrat Gone ridin'

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,273
    You might have to cut and extend the neck tube on the triple tree an inch or so but all the small Honda forks use the same neck bearings (with some exceptions for the moto bikes) so about anything would fit. You'll also have to add a fork stop--no biggie.

    If you go longer on your fork length consider using a Passport swingarm and 13" shocks to balance the bike out. That's what I had to do to use a set of XR-100 forks on my bike. The Passport's shock mounts are taller than the CT's and used in conjuction with cheap ($50) 13" shocks ought to level the bike out and give you some rear fender-to-tire clearance to boot.
    #11
  12. WILL_S

    WILL_S OUTLAW POSTIE 001

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Oddometer:
    2,392
    Location:
    goodly satisfactory place, qld
    #12
  13. Dirt Road Cowboy

    Dirt Road Cowboy Sometimes I'm A Jerk

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    513
    Location:
    Tyler, Texas
    Well, I found out that the XL 125 tree should bolt right up, so that's probably the route I'll be going. I will know for sure once all the parts get here and I take some measurements.

    I will try to remember to take pics and document the build for the next person that wants to make one. :deal

    Thanks for all your help.

    :1drink



    .
    #13
  14. Dirt Road Cowboy

    Dirt Road Cowboy Sometimes I'm A Jerk

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Oddometer:
    513
    Location:
    Tyler, Texas
    Crap! I didn't realize how long ago I started thinking about this! :eek1

    I got the CT200 frame, 140 Lifan engine, XL125 forks and tree, and a bunch of other parts.

    Then life came up, and all my 2 wheeled projects went on the back burner, and the only thing that I had to ride was my motorized bicycle.

    But, now the bug is back, as well as a little money to finish buying parts. :evil

    Maybe I can get this thing together and ride soon!
    #14