The All New LIQUID COOLED R1200GS threadfest

Discussion in 'GS Boxers' started by Dorsicano, Feb 3, 2011.

  1. tallguy-09

    tallguy-09 Smile 4 Miles

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,440
    Location:
    Vancouver
    The GS is the Top-Seller across Europe and the most important model for BMW Motorrad so it only makes sense to introduce the new engine in that model.

    [​IMG]
    www.motorradonline.de
  2. def

    def Ginger th wonder dog

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Oddometer:
    12,160
    Location:
    The woods and mountains of Alabama
    The same advantage that Harley Davidson gains by retaining the V-twin....a loyal following.
  3. kbasa

    kbasa Roubaix! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    Oddometer:
    71,145
    Location:
    Marin County, California
    I've been riding boxer motors for 35 years. They have a nice lazy way of making power and making it in a way that's really usable, even in crappy conditions.

    Yeah, you could make it a parallel twin with counterbalancer like the 800, but the boxer motor is very, very distinctive. That's the heritage.

    It'd be great if the R1250R turns out to be a Monster beater. CW had a photo and it looked like a /7 or something. Big tank and a flat seat at about the same height. It looked like it had male slider forks instead of a telelever. I could get with that. That's a BMW style heritage bike.
  4. Loutre

    Loutre Cosmopolitan Adv

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Oddometer:
    5,618
    Location:
    :o)
    Isn't what you mean the R1200R that will come out next year? with the same 'old' 2010 engine?
  5. slipknot

    slipknot Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Oddometer:
    906
    The boxer advantages, with or without water:

    Lower center of gravity

    Easy access for service or repairs

    Best foot protection in an accident: this is backed up by studies by Hurt and others.



    What I think is a negative with the new design, if I'm not mistaken on the design having not studied it, is the sharing of engine oil with the clutch and transmission. There are advantages to having them separate. I also like the single plate dry clutch, very light to work all day and fewer parts to replace.

    Or course a wet clutch can take more abuse but abusing a clutch was not a popular thing to do until ADV made abuse of fine machines obligatory for attaining manhood.:deal
  6. milo

    milo Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Oddometer:
    444
    Location:
    Clifton Mills, Almost Heaven.

    I'm not so sure about the low center of gravity. The aluminum heads and cylinders on any engine are fairly light but is there any other engine which has the heaviest part of it (crank and bottom end) located so high?
  7. rdcyclist

    rdcyclist Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Oddometer:
    1,244
    Location:
    SanHo, NorCal
    The prime reason for the Boxer engine is perfect primary harmonic balance. For a given displacement, an inline configuration cannot approach the smoothness of the Boxer. This is why Porsche, Subaru and most light aircraft engines are Boxer Configuration. In the case of the light aircraft, there is the small matter of FAA certification and difficulty of obtaining said cert...
  8. FlyingFinn

    FlyingFinn Long timer

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Oddometer:
    1,184
    Location:
    Los Gatos, CA
    You have mastered the art of sarcasm.

    Mikko
  9. Marki_GSA

    Marki_GSA Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Oddometer:
    1,135
    Location:
    Scotland
    Your absolutely right in theory right up until you add ignition. If they had fired both pots at the same time or a 4 cylinder boxer you get a smooth engine. What we have just now though is far from smooth. I have seen Harley's vibrate less than a BMW boxer.
  10. tagesk

    tagesk Tuscan rider

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Oddometer:
    3,231
    Location:
    Tuscany, Italy
    Assuming that the engine was not running, I suppose.

    [TaSK]
  11. lysak

    lysak Adventurer

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Oddometer:
    10
    Location:
    Prague,Czech Republic
  12. Motorfiets

    Motorfiets Long timer

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Oddometer:
    3,005
    Location:
    Southern California
  13. Beemerlover

    Beemerlover Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Oddometer:
    334
    I hafta say, that first pic looks really great! Almost makes me want to hold off getting a '13 GSA and wait for the WC GSA's to come out - almost...

    OTOH, being a beta tester sucks bigtime!!
  14. ytsiwt

    ytsiwt n00b

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Oddometer:
    5
    2 cylinder boxers aren't that smooth.

    Obviously the balance on the BMW boxer isn't that good or there would have been no need for BMW to add that single balance shaft to the 1200 hexhead or camhead.

    The balance on the 6 cylinder boxer is excellent with some of the pistons always in motion and very little rocking couple.

    The balance on the 4 cylinder boxer is OK but now some rocking couple enters and more 2nd order as there are points where all the pistons stop completely at the same time.

    The balance on the 360° 2 cylinder boxers leave a lot to be desired, especially on large cylinder configurations, as the pistons are not directly across from each other due to being on different crank throws with an offset between rod centers. 2 cylinder 360° boxers also have both pistons completely stop and change direction twice per revolution. Lots of higher RPM buzz and rocking couple excitement.

    The C/G on the BMW 2 cylinder boxer isn't all that great either as it has a deep wet sump so the crankshaft is high in the crankcase. The crank must also be high to keep the cylinder heads from dragging the ground in turns. That heavy alternator is also way up high way off the engine roll center. The transmission input shaft is high with the counter shaft not much lower.
  15. def

    def Ginger th wonder dog

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Oddometer:
    12,160
    Location:
    The woods and mountains of Alabama
    Typical inline motorcycle engine/transmission designs have employed shared engine oil successfully for years without problems. Also, as you point out, the wet clutch usually has longevity over the current boxer dry clutch design. Hopefully, the water cooled boxer will employ a simplified transmission design that eliminates the weak transmission input spline design while increasing reliability in this area. The only concerns with the shared oil designs is the shearing of the oil by the transmission to a lower viscosity that leaves the engine bearings vulnerable. Synthetics can help relieve the shearing.

    The water cooled boxer will provide a much quieter engine and transmsion and provide a new platform for increased power and performance.

    Finally, from the photos I have seen of the water boxer, the exhaust system bends and complexity could be reduced significantly providing a cleaner look, lower weight and less heat.
  16. vtbob

    vtbob wanderer

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Oddometer:
    641
    Location:
    Western Vermont
    Do we have any indication the Wasser boxer will be lighter than the current GS?
    Lower center of gravity?

    Clearly the power output will be high (130Hp)...but will the torque be better.
    The torque of the cam head is NOT especially good for an enging of it displacement...and it does rev high to get the HP
    Note the F800 engine has nearly 90% of the 1200 torgue with on 50% of it's displacement!
    Hopefully the torque will be MUCH better in the wasser boxer.

    Any better info?
  17. JStancampiano

    JStancampiano PhotoJoe

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Oddometer:
    466
    Location:
    N GA Mts
    Looks like no more x spoke wheels. Tubeless design similar to Yamaha....good move.

    Joe
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG][/QUOTE]
  18. SourKraut

    SourKraut Long timer

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Oddometer:
    7,467
    Location:
    New England
    The BMW GS cross spoke wheels have been tubeless since the mid 90's.
  19. hillbillypolack

    hillbillypolack Grumpy Old Goat

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Oddometer:
    6,983
    Location:
    Lidsville

    Can you clarify? The current GS makes 88 ft lbs and was / is enhanced by the exhaust flapper for lower torque delivery. Given, it's not a 'smooth' curve by dyno standards, it works very well in the real world.

    Could you reference other bikes in that displacement which have better torque and curves?

    Also, you note that the 800GS makes 90% of the 1200GS' torque at 50% its displacement? Last I checked, 50% of 1200 equals 600cc.
  20. EJ_92606

    EJ_92606 Rider

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,779
    Fact check:

    F800GS has 61 lb/ft of torque
    R1200GS has 89 lb/ft of torque

    Therefore R1200GS has 46% more torque than an F800GS or in your comparison, F800 has 68.5% of the torque of the 1200, not 90% and 67% of the displacement.

    But but the 1200 is a tank you might say, right. 516 vs 472 wet...that's less than 10% added weight for those sexy boxer pots.

    10% more weight, 46% more torque...I'll take those numbers any day and I did :-)

    Source 2012 models on BMW USA website