The All New LIQUID COOLED R1200GS threadfest

Discussion in 'GS Boxers' started by Dorsicano, Feb 3, 2011.

  1. MRHAPPY

    MRHAPPY GSIN

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,106
    Location:
    CENTRAL NY
    :rofl:freaky
    #21
  2. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,125
    Location:
    Sunny California
    What reliability issues?
    #22
  3. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,125
    Location:
    Sunny California
    That was me here ... :lol3
    #23
  4. DELTATANGO

    DELTATANGO Motorcyclist and Dog Walk

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Oddometer:
    13,964
    Location:
    Alabama
    I can see what it is.

    I bet you that it won't be on the next iteration.

    It is a marketing thing.
    #24
  5. spagthorpe

    spagthorpe Long timer

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Oddometer:
    14,881
    Location:
    San Diego
    I wish they would go ahead and just put 17" wheels on it. I bet even fewer people are ever going to take this beast offroad. At least allow everyone a better choice of rubber.
    #25
  6. BCC

    BCC I know better

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Oddometer:
    8,997
    Location:
    Southern NJ
    So, would a water cooled boxer make significantly more power?
    #26
  7. Dorsicano

    Dorsicano Adventurer

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    Oddometer:
    88
    Location:
    Grand Duchy
    the article mentions 128 hp
    #27
  8. Deans BMW

    Deans BMW Granpa Hoon

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Oddometer:
    3,638
    Location:
    Copperhill, Tennessee
    A Wasser Boxer has the potential to make a LOTmore power. you will prolly see this in 2012 as a 2012 or 2013 model.

    Modern emission and noise regs require the change to a Wasser Boxer.
    #28
  9. BordenBmw

    BordenBmw TheFrenchRider

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Oddometer:
    773
    Location:
    Grid Roads, Saskatchewan Canada

    It may be significantly heavier thought!<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><o:p></o:p>
    #29
  10. kvr929rr

    kvr929rr Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Oddometer:
    184
    Why on earth would it be heavier. This comes up everytime a water cooled boxer is brought up. The Multistrada with the same displacement is no heavier. The 1198 is a pretty light motor and their configuration is not that different, an extra crank throw and maybe a little more crankcase metal for the alternator housing. Neither is the KTM RC8 motor any heavier than the Camheads. Aluminum just isn't that heavy. A water cooled boxer will be significantly lighter, make more power and create more poverty. :wink:
    #30
  11. space

    space a.k.a. Jake

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Oddometer:
    2,633
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Well, the liquid cooling system obviously weighs something. If those other engines made it to a liquid-cooled generation without gaining net weight, then they must have lost it elsewhere.

    I'm skeptical that the BMW boxer engine has that much to lose. It already lost a good bit of weight between the 1150 and 1200 generations. The HP2 Enduro engine is a bit lighter still, but that was at the sacrifice of a counter balancer, so not as smooth.

    But hey, I'm no engineer, and there's always room for more clever design. Regardless, the additional complexity is indisputable, and I am not interested in that.
    #31
  12. tallguy-09

    tallguy-09 Smile 4 Miles

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,439
    Location:
    Vancouver
    I don't see the boxer engine on the page 1 picture, do I?
    Could it be the new 1200 Triumph, Triumph's seem to look like BMW's but they are not BMW's :lol3
    Why would I move the shaft drive to the left?

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    #32
  13. Dark Helmet

    Dark Helmet Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Oddometer:
    753
    Location:
    You'll know when I know...

    Some of you may be getting all excited about this, but I see this as analagous to what car companies do with successful cars. They have to "improve" them each year so they make them bigger and clutter them up with accessories that bastardize the concept. While technology improved on the airhead design (EFI is a great example in my view), BMW keeps adding electric this and ring that with servo assisted whatever. I don't want all that. I want a simple, easy to maintian and fixable bike wherever you find yourself. Give me a clutch cable versus hydraulic. I'll take manually adjustable shocks over EWS. Why the hell would you put that ring antenae crap on a bike that you take around the world? Just something else to break!

    Sorry, but a radiator is more complexity, something else to go wrong, something that adds to the difficulty (and expense) of service. Yes boxers get hot in traffic, but do I want to add all that crap?

    I am not anti improvement. I would take a wet clutch, but only if its more accessible and easier to fix than the current dry single plate clutch. I like the current clutch, but it is not easily servicable anywhere but the dealer.

    So some of you may get excited about the radiators, but count me out. I like simple for this kind of bike.
    #33
  14. BCC

    BCC I know better

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Oddometer:
    8,997
    Location:
    Southern NJ
    The problem is Larry, you're not the target market. And they're doing well leaving you behind.

    But don't worry for BMW. If this thing makes 20-30% more power, I'll buy it. They'll suck me in again.
    #34
  15. cug

    cug --

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Oddometer:
    5,125
    Location:
    Sunny California
    I like the gadgets. I don't care about water cooling though. The only advantage to that will be that the water will dampen the rattling noise so a boxer will not sound as if someone forgot some nuts in the chambers ... :evil
    #35
  16. JimVonBaden

    JimVonBaden "Cool" Aid!

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Oddometer:
    56,212
    Location:
    Alexandria, VA
    You really have nothing of value to add, do you?

    Jim :brow

    PS Just like PeterK
    #36
  17. lwm

    lwm Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Oddometer:
    181
    Location:
    Santa Cruz Mountains
    Dear God, please, a wet clutch. Please.
    #37
  18. yellowbirdrs

    yellowbirdrs Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Oddometer:
    966
    Location:
    Ags. MX
    it's says 8 valves DOHC engine double plug fuel injection 1270cc with a 14.5kg of torque and 128 bhp. New front beak and the headlight like the one in the F800

    [​IMG]
    #38
  19. tallguy-09

    tallguy-09 Smile 4 Miles

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,439
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Sure the Boxer future will look "cool" but I don't think its a BMW, Triumph has a test & engineering facility in Spain...not sure what's wrong with the dry clutch, does it make sense not to have one? How else can you keep the engine reasonably short, yes there must be a rear wheel somewhere :-)
    #39
  20. Semper Fi

    Semper Fi Runs with Scissors

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Oddometer:
    872
    Location:
    Kingston, NH
    14.5 kgm = 104.9 lb-ft of torque

    Not too shabby for the ol' girl :evil
    #40