The New Ninja 300

Discussion in 'Road Warriors' started by studad, Sep 13, 2012.

  1. studad

    studad Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Oddometer:
    937
    Location:
    Mtn View, MO
    Is anybody else pretty excited to see these?

    I've been a fan of the 250 since I spent a month or so on one in college. My friend had one and I had a Honda Rebel. Too much fun for the street, just needed a little more power.... :norton
    #1
  2. TonyKZ1

    TonyKZ1 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Oddometer:
    750
    Location:
    Marble Hill, MO. U.S.A.
    Oh yea, I was watching the Kawasaki event in New York City via their website, plus I've read the rumors previously posted on here an other sites. I've still got my 1989 Ninja 250, but the new one sure looks nice. I wouldn't mind a test ride on one. I also just found a new page on Kawasaki's site http://ninja300.kawasaki.com/Home/
    Tony
    #2
  3. Gryphon12

    Gryphon12 Long timer

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,358
    Location:
    Carnation, WA USA
    Don't start another thread, please. There are two already. Just turn the page and look for them. Multiple threads for new bikes are a complete waste of everyone's time.
    #3
  4. studad

    studad Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Oddometer:
    937
    Location:
    Mtn View, MO
    Sorry, Gryp, I should have heard that advice 36 minutes earlier!

    Jumbled threads about multiple bikes are what seem to waste my time. No continuity. The sense of community and conversation is lost.

    But I digress, this is a thread about the new fly weight ninja. My gripes should go to the basement!

    How long until the new 300s are on showroom floors?
    #4
  5. Asphalt Assault

    Asphalt Assault Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Oddometer:
    217
    Location:
    Vallejo, CA
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Looking pretty good!
    #5
  6. sraber

    sraber Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Oddometer:
    339
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Wow nice.:eek1
    #6
  7. LuciferMutt

    LuciferMutt Rides slow bike slow

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Oddometer:
    11,593
    Location:
    New(er) Mexico
    Personally, I think it's a stupid idea. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the 250, and it has been successful for three decades.

    Now that Kawasaki is facing a valid threat in the 250 class, they do what? Take the easy way out and bump the displacement 50cc. Will it be quicker? Yeah of course, but it will also be more expensive, and most depressingly, NOT A 250 ANYMORE! Why is the answer always bumping the displacement? I fear this is a big clumsy step down a very slippery slope that has already ruined countless other machines (VFR anyone?)

    Pretty soon the smallest bike anyone will be able to buy in the US is a 1000...

    Everyone complains that the 250 would be perfect if it had "just a little more power" but it's a 250 for cryin' out loud. it's not supposed to be super fast.
    #7
  8. janeuner

    janeuner Get Some

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,473
    Location:
    Illinois
    Despite a sticker in the stock photos, the specs do not mention ABS.

    Swing, miss.
    #8
  9. studad

    studad Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Oddometer:
    937
    Location:
    Mtn View, MO
    I'm almost totally with you here. What i would have loved to see was a 400 at this price and the 250 still on the shelf.
    #9
  10. larryboy

    larryboy Chopper Rider

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Oddometer:
    15,380
    Location:
    Returning likes on redemption road.

    Well, I can see a tone ring on the front wheel. Schwing?
    #10
  11. janeuner

    janeuner Get Some

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,473
    Location:
    Illinois
    I saw it too. I read it as an omen that Kawasaki NA won't deliver 300cc ABS bikes in the states, even though manufacturing is perfectly capable of doing so. Hopefully I am wrong, but not placing bets.
    #11
  12. larryboy

    larryboy Chopper Rider

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Oddometer:
    15,380
    Location:
    Returning likes on redemption road.
    Kawi does doo some dumb stuff, but if they're going after the little CBR it'd better have ABS as an option.
    #12
  13. Navin

    Navin Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Oddometer:
    8,475
    Both non and ABS are listed on the USA site now. That 50cc didn't cause a price increase, but the new frame and body probably caused a few bucks to be added on. I think they missed the price boat but win in the appearance dept.

    $4799 and $5499 with ABS.

    A new slot in $ but a pretty big step up in appearance from the 2012 or the CBR near moped look IMO.

    As before, it should easily walk from the CBR and appeal to new riders who can't tell it from a 600-1000cc supersport, and from 30' away, I'm not sure many could now judging ONLY from the pics and vids.
    #13
  14. DiabloADV

    DiabloADV Semi-Occasional

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    Oddometer:
    2,338
    Location:
    Nor Cal, USA
    $1k more than the mini-CBR/abs? Glad I bought the ceebee.

    Plus - what I like about the CBR is that they didn't try to make it pretend its a sportbike, styling-wise. It's more like a mini-sports touring bike. I don't wanna ride a fake sports bike.
    #14
  15. Just GO!

    Just GO! Countersteer it.

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,867
    Location:
    SE Ohio

    Yup.

    Same goes for a lot of things. Compact trucks are now almost as big as full sized trucks were a couple decades ago. Bigger ain't always better.

    Leave it at 250cc, I say.
    #15
  16. Navin

    Navin Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Oddometer:
    8,475

    It isn't physically any larger than it would be as a 250, and the 50cc will only strengthen the weakest part of the torque curve. I doubt you't be able to tell one from the other without the decal on the side in back to back rides.

    I'd have rather they made it a 350 with 50 HP!
    #16
  17. GotMojo?

    GotMojo? Long timer

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Oddometer:
    4,109
    Location:
    Ohio
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    I like it. For those complaining about the price, I don't see an issue. Its still pretty damn cheap. Way better looking than the Honda, and it'll be a bit quicker. I think they will sell a ton of them.
    #17
  18. GotMojo?

    GotMojo? Long timer

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Oddometer:
    4,109
    Location:
    Ohio
    If they'd made a 350, you'd want a 400.
    #18
  19. Navin

    Navin Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Oddometer:
    8,475
    No, I know what I want, apply the tech to build the lightest, best suspended supersport bike with high output per liter, and a 50 HP 350 screamer with a weight of about 310 lbs. is feasable. I'd not expect it at $4500 but it can be built and would smoke alot of high displacement bikes on a twisty road or track, as my 50 HP 265 lbs sumoto does already. :lol3
    #19
  20. Gryphon12

    Gryphon12 Long timer

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,358
    Location:
    Carnation, WA USA
    If those photos are of production models, it is a very standard riding position. After a big suspension upgrade, and maybe brakes, I'd add lower bars and rear sets.
    #20