The Vintage Trials Thread

Discussion in 'Trials' started by Garthe, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,673
    We really need something like ITSA here in the UK. There are no rules related to the older bike classes, and its easily possible to spend £10K+ on building a Brit powered Frankenstein machine to ride in the "P65" class. No problem with that, but it obviously means those with more authentic bikes might as well stay home, and I guess that as there are also no rules related to twin-shock, that class will soon be going the same way here in the UK?
  2. buls4evr

    buls4evr No Marks....

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Oddometer:
    2,318
    Location:
    Michissippi & Nuevo Mexico

    I still have my KT255 Kawasaki, vintage 1975 for sale if you are interested. PM me:deal. The sport just died in the MidEast around Michigan.
  3. lamotovita

    lamotovita Ageing Adventurer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,640
    Location:
    WA/AZ, USA
    AHRMA's refusal to add such a class is one of the reasons I gave up on them.
    The fact that they have that class for race bikes but won't do it for Trials bikes say's "we don't want you Trials riders" in my opinion.
  4. darmst6829

    darmst6829 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Oddometer:
    379
    Location:
    Redmond WA
    AHRMA has a tough time creating sections that suit the premier heavyweight motorcycles and modern classics let alone adding post vintage to the mix. The heavyweight bikes are difficult to ride in anything other then traditional trials sections and the post vintage riders would be bored silly. Most modern trials held now have a vintage class so I would suggest taking your post vintage machines and ride them. I have ridden a couple modern trials on my classic class Bultaco and would consider the sections as equal or harder then AHRMA 2 line. Again anyone riding a post vintage machine would be bored and unhappy at an AHRMA event.
  5. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,673

    And I guess thats one of the reasons some AHRMA events have less than 20 entries, and ITSA seems to be going from strength to strength?
  6. Gordo83

    Gordo83 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Oddometer:
    161
    Location:
    New England

    Not sure it was understood what I meant by Post Vintage. As I said in my first post, I'm talking about bikes from the 80's with twin shocks, drum brakes and are air cooled. Seems like the largest class when I was at VMD in 07,08 and 09 was the Modern Classic. I just don't see how a rider on a 78 TY250 would have fun and be challenged, but a rider on an 80 SWM or an 84 Fantic would be bored and unhappy.
    I would think it all depends on who and how the sections are laid out.
  7. SnoDrtRider

    SnoDrtRider Got Snow?

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Oddometer:
    2,650
    Location:
    South Jersey... Close to the Pines
    Here are two organizations whose series may be close enough for you.

    http://www.mid-atlantictrials.com/

    http://www.newyorkaircooledtrials.com/index.html
  8. Gordo83

    Gordo83 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Oddometer:
    161
    Location:
    New England
    Thank you. I'm familiar with both orgaizations. I already ride a series, here in New England, but it is a Modern Trials club.
    I'm just trying to figure out why ahrma is against adding a class that is, for lack of a better term, 'like design'. As I said, I think ahrma made a great decision to add Post Vintage to Moto Cross, as I saw how large the classes were at Unadilla and how well it was accepted. I feel that getting more Trials riders involved with basically the same bikes, can only be a good thing. And I'm open to hear the reasons why it wouldn't.
  9. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,673
    I get the feeling that there is some truth in the suggestion that AHRMA trials are set out to cater for riders of heavyweight rigid bikes? Obviously if thats the case, it would be a waste of time for them to include a class for the far more competitive post 78 twin-shocks.
  10. lamotovita

    lamotovita Ageing Adventurer

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,640
    Location:
    WA/AZ, USA
    That's why there are splits in the sections. The disparity between riders and bikes abilities is no greater in vintage Trials than in modern Trials. When I set a modern Trial I acommodate everone from kids on small bikes to old men and women on trail bikes to national level Trials riders.
    If Cody Webb came to one of our local events he and I would ride the same loop and sections, on different lines. Comparing the two of us is at least as inequitable as comparing a rigid Norton to a modern Trials bike.
    If Ahrma has a "tough time creating sections" they might consider making some changes that would get more people involved in the sport, like acommodating the same vintage Trials bikes as the race bikes they acommodate. More riders involved equals more spectators, observers, and helpers to set meets.
    There would also likely be more vintage racers interested in riding the Trials. I see lots of late 70s and early 80s MX bikes at AHRMA events. I suspect those riders are more likely to be interested in riding an SWM than a James.
  11. darmst6829

    darmst6829 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Oddometer:
    379
    Location:
    Redmond WA
    While I may not be able to write eloquently on why its important to cut off machines after 1979 AHRMA’s mission statement says it all.

    "MISSION STATEMENT: Observed trials is a very significant part of historic motorcycle competition. It began as a wintertime sport for European enthusiasts, who tested themselves by tracing ancient Roman roads. These riders negotiated various obstacles along the way, all of which gave test to both man and machine. As the “gentleman’s sport” developed, such obstacles became more specific, and more challenging. From the 1980s until today, the obstacles presented to trials competitors have been inconceivable for most motorcycle riders.
    AHRMA’s observed trials goal is to provide its members a safe, historically accurate environment to showcase and experience vintage machinery. The key to this enjoyment is the observed sections. From the 1950s into the ‘70s, sections were mainly composed of wide-open areas of challenging terrain, with the rider’s choice of line determining his/her success. Observed sections reminiscent of this era are critical in AHRMA’s representation of classic observed trials. With period-accurate sections, machines will remain true to their original concept, and the techniques required to ride them will do the same, enhancing the entire vintage trials scene. The trials-riding experience will undoubtedly result in good friends, good rides and good fun."
  12. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,673

    Unfortunately for AHRMA as the older riders who compete on the early rigid bikes, and heavy cumbersome twin-shock bikes, are no longer able to compete, the number of entries will reduce drastically.

    There is little or nothing to attract younger competitors to the very early machines. so ultimately unless AHRMA chooses to move with the times or work directly with ITSA to better promote the sport, it seems to me that the demise of trialling under AHRMA rules is simply a matter of time.
  13. Gordo83

    Gordo83 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Oddometer:
    161
    Location:
    New England

    The same could be said for any motorcycle discipline. But riders and racers move on, just as ahrma moved on to include Post Vintage MX.

    The riders ability is the key, not the motorcycle itself. If people think that a rider struggling on a 76 Yamaha TY 250 would clean the same line on an 82 Fantic they are mistaken. I think Trials riding has more to do with the rider than the bike than in most other motorsports.
  14. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,673
    I would have thought age of the riders interested in competing on the very old bikes, is also a reason why numbers are going to decline as the years go by?
  15. Gordo83

    Gordo83 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Oddometer:
    161
    Location:
    New England
    I'm sure this is true Twin-shocker. I would also imagine $$ comes in to play. Pretty expensive to restore and keep the older bikes running. At this point someone wanting to give Trials a shot can go on craigslist and pick up a running project bike for around $1000.00.

    Really, all you have to do is look at ahrma's 'standings' page for the first 4 events. 22 riders combined in the Girder, Rigid and Premier classes. 56 Riders combined in the Classic and Modern Classic. 48 of those are from the Modern Classic class.
  16. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,673
    Yes cost certainly comes into it. Here in the UK where there are no sensible rules related to older bikes, its possible to buy a brand new Brit powered twin-shock bike , costing £10k+ and to ride in the P65 class!

    Guess that sort of thing isnt a problem in the US, but less and less people are prepared to pay large sums of money on the very early bikes, which to be honest are pretty awful to ride, even if the sections are very easy.
  17. Thumpermeister

    Thumpermeister roost maker

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Oddometer:
    2,840
    Location:
    Frosbite Falls
    I've ridden a couple vintage trials events in Canada that seemed to have no issue accomodating older (albeit well ridden) pre-65 bikes and twin shocks up to a couple early 80's SWMs.
    No cut-off year I was aware of and 3 or 4 line choices seemed to cover all the bases for rider skill and bike class. Perhaps the venues just suited that. No monos obviously!
    Not much AHRMA trials in the northeast but I never understood their old pre-74 cutoff for trials (which is more of an MX milestone for bike development then trials) which might explain what the "R" in AHRMA stands for! :lol3
  18. darmst6829

    darmst6829 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Oddometer:
    379
    Location:
    Redmond WA
    I don’t think that “age of the riders interested in competing on the very old bikes” has anything to do with AHRMA’s problems. I believe the problem is with trials itself. Trials is a lot harder to ride then it looks from the sidelines. I know several AHRMA racers who bought trials motorcycles to ride on Saturday and then gave it up in frustration.
    Many of my AHRMA peers (50-60ish) are switching to Premier bikes. The machines are visually interesting and garner the most attention at the events I attend. . The Premier bikes are way before my time but that’s where the hard core AHRMA riders are heading.
    The problem with the Premier bikes is that they are expensive to build unlike the later machines that can be found at garage sales inexpensively. Newer trials motorcycles ride better but seem out of place at an AHRMA event. Seige saw the light last year and wrote an article about it titled “How I came to understand Dick Mann’s reasoning” . Though he is writing about vintage MX its in the same vain as our discussion on vintage trials.
    http://www.siegecraftnw.com/credo4.htm
  19. Twin-shocker

    Twin-shocker Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Oddometer:
    1,673
    Thing is David less and less people have the money to build the very costly early bikes, and entries reduce as a result of this. The fact AHRMA has no sensible classes to allow riders on newer and less expensive bikes to compete, will mean numbers of riders continue to reduce, until ultimately its no longer viable to run events.

    Unless AHRMA moves with the time, it seems to me that before very long its going to be finished as an organiser of serious competitive trialling. I guess the decision has to made on whether to run the organisation in accord with the whims of a few and carry on treading water, or to look at what ITSA is providing, and seriously consider AHRMA moving in the same direction?
  20. Gordo83

    Gordo83 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Oddometer:
    161
    Location:
    New England
    I'm not sure how the latest year they will except, such as a 1979 Bultaco 199, would look out of place at an ahrma event. Especially considering there were 56 bikes of the same style "Classic" and "Modern Classic" and there were only 16 in all the "Premier" classes combined, for the first 4 events of this year.