Triumph Tiger 800

Discussion in 'British Beasts: Triumph Tigers' started by ScrambDaddy, Jul 12, 2010.

  1. Mr_Chris

    Mr_Chris Get away, evil car!

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Oddometer:
    298
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Leaving choppers in the dust... you almost seemed surprised. :rofl I think the ratio og "go" to "no" in the chopper space is about 1:500... Not saying some cruisers/streetfighters arent fast (rocket 3, diavel, new HD with their "level 3" options, customs) but most of the ape hanger crowd, as opposed to cruiser riders, are posers.

    Just my personal opinion from behind a computer screen. :lol3
  2. Mr_Chris

    Mr_Chris Get away, evil car!

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Oddometer:
    298
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    I love watchin ppl make their Tigers into their own customised ride. It's one of the great thinga about ADV bikes, they have serious electrics and are a great "platform" to work on, and people put cool stuff on them routinely. :clap

    For the tradeoffs you make in glam and weight, having the robust platform and ability to Just Go really makes it work.

    Nice Job fbj!

    Chris
  3. the_babaji

    the_babaji Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Oddometer:
    374
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    How do you like the TT windscreen adjuster/gps mount combo?
    I have been waiting to ask some questions. :evil
    It looks like the GPS mount bar can be raised or lowered (2 position, nice). Do you find the mount to be a little higher than it needs to be?
    How stable is it? Does it vibrate at all making the print on the screen 'blurry' at all?
    How does the screen asjuster work? Does it tilt forward past stock? How 'bout tilting rearward?
    Is there any adjustment to raise the screen higher than stock or is it just a 'tilt' thing?
  4. internalcombust

    internalcombust Yes its dirty, thanks.

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,586
    Location:
    Middle TN.
    What is your windshield set up? It looks very functional. :ear
  5. fbj913

    fbj913 On the Beemer Kool-Aid

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,456
    Location:
    KC MO
    Thanks! Miss fbj913 has had about enough of the garage time however :lol3. Me on the other hand. I am addicted! I love customizing my bikes! :clap
  6. eram310

    eram310 Been here awhile

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Oddometer:
    101
    You are completely correct. I think I will use one switched wire for the heated grips for the GPS and radar detector. The current draw on either one of those is very low.
  7. blacktiger

    blacktiger Tigers R great.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Oddometer:
    3,901
    Location:
    St.Leonards on Sea, England.
    Speculation.
    According to their respective web sites the DNA flows more air/minute than the K&N which in turn flows more than the stock filter.
  8. fbj913

    fbj913 On the Beemer Kool-Aid

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Oddometer:
    2,456
    Location:
    KC MO
    I do not have the stock windwhield. I have the Givi AF6401 (http://www.giviusa.com/My-motorcycle/?ma=TRIUMPH&mo=Tiger-800---Tiger-800-XC). The Givi comes with some extra mounting hardware that barely fits with the Tourtech gps mount (this was a fear of mine when I ordered it but I was able to make it all work). The Tourtech mount does not make the Givi adjustable like the stock screen would be. So, I can not really comment on how adjustable the stock screen could be with the Tourtech mount. I can say that the way I see it is that it is only adjustable back and forth not up and down. Only the two side mounting points are adjustable. I may try to mount up the stock screen just to see how it all works.
    I really like the Givi screen. I have about 3,000 miles on it now and have had no issues. I like that the top piece is adjustable while on the move. It also keeps the wind clear of my shoulders. The wind hitting my shoulders was my biggest complaint about the stocker.
    The GPS mount part of the Touratech is perfect. The mount is just the right height. I had to mount it in the low position because that big aqua box is pretty big and it fits best in that position without touching the wind screen. If it was any lower it would start to cover your instrument cluster. It has no vibration at all that I can tell.
    Regarding the RAM mount aqua box (http://www.ram-mount.com/EmptyPages/AQUABOXES/AQ6MAIN/tabid/1538/Default.aspx). I had an older Garmin Nuvi laying around that I really wanted to use because it is paid for and so far has been flawless. I wanted to keep it on the bike at all times. I have another newer nuvi that I wanted to use for my long trips. Its a little nicer but it has a wide screen on it. So I wanted an Aqua box that would fit both. Because my newer Nuvi has a wide screen I had to go with the "medium wide" aqua box. The box is constructed well however it is very "thick". The problem I was finding is that they did not have a "thinner" box (that's what she said:lol3) that would still be wide enough (that's what she said:lol3). So I was stuck with the Medium/Wide size. I then had to make a rear mount to hook up to the Tourtech cross bar. Also I am happy with the plastic/rubberized screen on the box. I was worried that while touching the screen through the rubber that it would be like touching several buttons at a time. Not the case at all. It works perfect.
    Just FYI. After looking at other screens, like the Madstad, the Tourtech GPS mount will not work with it.

    Did I miss anything? :D Hope that helps.:1drink
  9. shadygrady

    shadygrady Adventurer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Oddometer:
    64
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    With all things being the same (porosity of the filter material and surface area of the filter element as its flattened out), it would make sense to me that if one filter has the filter element squeezed into a tighter space (which is evident on the K&N) then that filter would have a more restricted flow than the other. I'm no expert but it seems logical to me.

    I'm sure there is a lot more to these filters than just what meets the eye.
  10. Mercury264

    Mercury264 Once you go Triple...

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Oddometer:
    22,420
    Location:
    Masshole
    I'm not sure you can draw that conclusion based mainly on the fact that K&N filters are shite. I know, it's like oil and what people swear by but I'll never have a K&N filter on any of my bikes. In fact, my Speed Triple had one fitted by the PO and I removed it.
  11. swimmer

    swimmer armchair asshole

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Oddometer:
    5,108
    Location:
    tucson, AZ, It's a dry hate.
    plus 1
  12. bross

    bross Where we riding to?

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Oddometer:
    4,774
    Location:
    Osoyoos, BC
    I'd agree, with the disclaimer that I'd be OK running a K&N on a street bike in a non dusty environment. I ran one on my cruiser for 4 years and 40,000kms with no ill effects, but I'd never run one on my DR or any bike I rode on gravel roads etc.
  13. shadygrady

    shadygrady Adventurer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Oddometer:
    64
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    I apologize! I certainly wasn't trying to draw any overall conclusions. I just wanted to address the comment about the filter surface area vs filter element surface area. The original question was asking about one filter having a smaller/larger surface area than the other (K&N is smaller) and the discussion led to the surface area of the element (??). Too many variables to conclude anything with a visual inspection. Real testing is the only answer. Everything else is speculation! I've heard the same thing that Blacktiger mentioned about the better air flow rate of the DNA
  14. blacktiger

    blacktiger Tigers R great.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Oddometer:
    3,901
    Location:
    St.Leonards on Sea, England.
    Quite and that's why I also have the Uniflow pre-filter fitted.
  15. Mercury264

    Mercury264 Once you go Triple...

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Oddometer:
    22,420
    Location:
    Masshole
    To me that seems counter-intuitive - unless I'm mis-undersanding. You put on a K&N and since it's flow more air (and hence, more dirt/dust) you put on a pre-filter -do I have that right ?

    If so...that doesn't make a whole lot of sense old bean :D
  16. MisterPX

    MisterPX Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2011
    Oddometer:
    143
    Location:
    SE WI
    Except that if he was going to uni filter it anyways, the K&N kinda makes up for the added uni restriction.
  17. Flying Dave

    Flying Dave Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Oddometer:
    139
    Location:
    Nashville
    I guess HT has finally released the guards. Good to see. Any fitment issues?
  18. helotaxi

    helotaxi Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Oddometer:
    380
    My point was that if the engine draws less than either is capable of flowing, then which one CAN flow the most is moot. If the possible CFM of the filter is less than that of the engine, the engine, not the filter, is the limiting factor.

    Figure 800cc x 5,000rpm (redline RPM/2 for a 4-stroke) = 4,000,000cc/m Convert that to CFM and you get 141.25cfm. According to K&N (the "more restrictive" of the two) their filter will flow 176cfm. The air filter is not the limiting factor. It is capable of flowing more air than the engine is capable of drawing at redline.

    If you judge filtration efficiency by airflow alone, then both are worse than stock and neither should be considered. There's a lot more to it.
  19. shadygrady

    shadygrady Adventurer

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Oddometer:
    64
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Wouldn't the exhaust efficiency need to be factored in somehow?
  20. blacktiger

    blacktiger Tigers R great.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Oddometer:
    3,901
    Location:
    St.Leonards on Sea, England.
    Well, firstly you need to read my post properly. I put in a DNA filter.
    The reasoning is that the air filter is buried under the tank and takes an hour to get at. So I put a low maintenance filter in there and put the pre-filter to take out the worst of the dirt. I never said, wrote or quoted that it was for performance. For me it's purely for ease of maintenance.