I thought that I was a skimmer. But after reading the news briefs on the Waldo fire I didn't come away with Terrorist attack at all. I could see where it is convent to suggest that every arson fire is a terrorist attack. But past investigations suggest that there is a clear line when it comes to intent for an arson fire. In the past people have started fires for all sorts of reasons. Ranging from stress, to needing work as a fire fighter. On the other hand if the investigators who are working this fire want a quick cop out. Then the community needs to hold them accountable for their actions. One can't just claim terrorist act without any proof.