Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Road Warriors' started by fivehitsweak, Jun 3, 2010.
Cheap, theoretically dependable, logical. Ugh, Mondays.
I concur..cost effective, amazing gas mileage (if it meets projections up to 73mpg), and Honda reliability...hard to go wrong. I wonder if a 6'5" frame would be comfy on one? Guess I'll have to go by the shop to find out.
What is it? Crosstourer?
NC700X with all the factory goodies bolted on.
Gotta ya... Ain't that the one with the tank under the seat??
It is indeed. So, one can grab a six pack and put in the "tank." See? Logical.
yep. pop the pillion seat off to fill up.
Pretty short wheelbase, I dunno that I'd put much more than a rain suit in the topcase. Then again, with the big storage space in the faux tank, not sure I'd opt for the topcase anyway.
I'm 6'2" and I sat on one the other day. It was pretty damn comfy, actually. It also looks better in person. Of course, there's also this, as an option:
It has a "real" tank though.
Now yer talking...
while discovering what how i like my 94 so much, I was looking into these....
popular opinion is that the experience is no where near the same though
Definitely not the same. But if you can get past the styling, the new VFR is a fantastic bike, IMO, and lightly used examples present a really good value in the sport-touring category.
Call me a Grandpa but I really dig the Moto Guzzi NF 500:
Awesome looking bike, I'd love to have one of these someday.
OOO! SFC1000 in the background.....
<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ARAZIzRW5tw" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" width="560"></iframe>